Interesting article for the Artsy-Fartsies

[Daradon]

Originally Posted by HOZ

Well allow me to Rebut....

1) Aliza Shvart's "art" was one of three examples given by the author though it was certainly the main one since at the time of the article's writing it was certainly headline news. As clearly written, "Or so she claimed; whether she actually did any of this remains unclear." the author doubted the authenticity. But whether her art authentic or not wasn't the point of the article.

Which goes to answer #2:
- Why would anyone who actually read this article and comprehended it talk about talk about "inflammatory posts" and "hoaxes". It is about the author's opinion about how art should be taught.

So....

#3 why focus on this hoax when the article is about a more traditional teaching method? Because the people either did NOT read the article or simple did not understand what the author was saying.


Finally, thanks for the psychoanalysing and the offhanded insult. A lot to do about an article on Art.

That was a reply to Iowa. See? Here is the whole reply?

Wow are you drunk?

I'm done here. I'm leaving it in the hands of the mods.

[Daradon]

^^^ Er post #17. You, quoting Iowa. Cant get your quote of his included in my quote. But read #17 it's all there.

You never once replied to me.

All your doing is misrepresenting all the last challenges represented to you. Falsifying what people said and what you said.

This is my last reply. You obviously cannot act truthfully even though it is all in black and white.

[Reggie Dunlop]

[Azure]

Well, I didn't think that the thread title was 'trolling'....and no, Hoz certainly doesn't post 'many' or even 'some' of his threads in such a manner.

If you want to ding him for rep because YOU feel he trolled, well, ding everyone who starts slinging the personal attacks back and forth.

I read the article....and I agree with ocothorp for the most part. Although I don't agree that the tread title was 'anything else BUT an insult'...or whatever he said.

You see it so many times though....attack the source, not the argument. Happens in the media all the time, in my personal life, and I'm sure everyone else has experienced it as well. And we all don't like it. So why not cut back on the ridiculous personal attacks, and talk about the story at hand. And if you don't agree, say so, in a respectful way.

For the most part I find myself just skipping over certain comments because they start off with a personal attack, while I read others because they are respectful and too the point.

Just my opinion.

[HOZ]

Originally Posted by Daradon

^^^ Er post #17. You, quoting Iowa. Cant get your quote of his included in my quote. But read #17 it's all there.

You have obviously missed the train of thought or I have not made it clear enough.

Start with post #35 which quotes the first time I replied to you.
Which you replied to on #38
I reply on #40 which I was refering back to #35 assuming you were following along. I added what I said on #17 to re-iterate my point I made to IFF.

You never once replied to me.

#35 post kind of defeats this reply. If you mean your very first post onthis thread. Yes you are correct. I replied to your second one to me.

All your doing is misrepresenting all the last challenges represented to you. Falsifying what people said and what you said.

I have not misrepresented anything or falsified anything. You had trouble following along and misunderstood.

This is my last reply. You obviously cannot act truthfully even though it is all in black and white.

Fantastic. Because if you can't follow a conversation then it is no wonder you couldn't comprehend the article.

[Daradon]

Originally Posted by HOZ

Fantastic. Because if you can't follow a conversation then it is no wonder you couldn't comprehend the article.

Again with the personal attack...

I comprehended it just fine, I just never got to argue it because you claimed we all had trouble with it from the beginning, even before you argued your point. Then you ran away from the conversation.

Me saying I think you were trolling, and you outright saying what you did above are two totally different things. I didn't attack you personally. You insulted me several times.

And yeah I replied, but only cause your PM's are locked. I wonder why...

[KevanGuy]

Annnd we're done.