Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-31-2007, 08:49 AM   #41
return to the red
Franchise Player
 
return to the red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
Exp:
Default

^^ up to a certain amount 350k I think it starts diminishing
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
return to the red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 09:05 AM   #42
greyshep
#1 Goaltender
 
greyshep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary Satellite Community
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
Regarding the GST on houses, I seem to recall that when GST went down from 7 to 6% that houses were not affected; because GST on new homes is less than 5% with the rebate you get from the gov't.
Not anymore. That was when the average price of a home was far less than $400,000.

It was a sliding scale rate where the more expensive your home was, you paid more GST. Kind of a luxury tax if you will. The bigwigs who were building $350k+ home at that time were paying full gst. Joe average who was spending $150-200k were seeing gst rates of around 3.5-4% I believe. Funny how things have changed. A $350k home is now a starter home.

I believe there was some low level noise about having these rates adjusted again, but I dont think anything ever happened as this was a federally administered plan which would obviously effect new home prices throughout the country.
greyshep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 09:11 AM   #43
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I dont like the whole minibudget garbage.

If I wanted a whorish populist party I would vot Lib.

Leave this stuff till the official budget. I like the GST down by 5 because its easier to calculate
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 09:17 AM   #44
ZDogg
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lethbridge and PL11 (formerly 311)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
... I like the GST down by 5 because its easier to calculate
Thats what I like too. Maybe the 5% rate will help us get rid of the stupid Penny once and for all. That should save the government (and taxpayers) some money over the long run.
ZDogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 10:44 AM   #45
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

I think some of the confusion about GST for homes is because of how it's calcualted.
As far as I know, you only pay ~ 3-4% because essentially you get a rebate for the GST that was already paid on materials, and you really only pay GST on the labour.
How this will affect what you pay based on posession date I'm not sure.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 10:48 AM   #46
return to the red
Franchise Player
 
return to the red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
Exp:
Default

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tax/individ...ntially-e.html

regarding GST and rates on new or renovated houses
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
return to the red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:00 AM   #47
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
What would the average family spend per year? Bills have GST I think, like Shaw, phone and all that. Gasoline, some grocery items. $35,000 spent possibly, would be $350.
I ran the math for my budget a few years ago. At the time I was earning a gross salary of about $42k, and of that, I calculated that only about $10k was spent on things that are subject to the GST (housing, groceries, RRSP contributions, etc. account for the lion's share of my net income). Assuming I still spend a similar portion of my net salary on GST-applicable items, a 1% cut would save me only about $100 per year...which works out to about two extra Starbucks coffees per month.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:29 AM   #48
MacDougalbry
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

On a $500,000 new home you will save $5000. On a $300,000 new home, you will save $1920. This change will probably be effective on contracts signed after today for possessions after Jan 1, 2008.
MacDougalbry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:32 AM   #49
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
a 1% cut would save me only about $100 per year...which works out to about two extra Starbucks coffees per month.
Or, another way to look at it....... for me these cuts work out to about $300-400 per year. Pretty much what we got from Uncle Ralph a couple of years ago. But instead of getting some program together (which has the potential to be abused or mis-managed) to hand out cheques, they are giving us tax breaks.

Works for me!
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 11:44 AM   #50
flamesaresmokin
Lifetime Suspension
 
flamesaresmokin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philtopia
Exp:
Default

I'd be happy if they'd leave gst alone and lower income taxes to a more reasonable level for the middle bracket....comparitvely it is the worst bracket to be in and most canadians are in that bracket.
flamesaresmokin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:22 PM   #51
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDogg View Post
Thats what I like too. Maybe the 5% rate will help us get rid of the stupid Penny once and for all. That should save the government (and taxpayers) some money over the long run.
Not when pyschological pricing still continues to come into play, and items are priced $9.99 instead of $10.00.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:30 PM   #52
loob job
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

I'm an accountant in the homebuilding industry and here's what we got from the Canadian Homebuilders Association. This should answer the house questions in this thread.


OTTAWA, October 30, 2007
– The Harper government’s decision to cut the GST to 5 per cent,
effective January 1, 2008, will significantly improve housing affordability, the Canadian Home
Builders’ Association (CHBA) said today.
“This is great news for both home buyers and owners,” CHBA President Richard Lind said. “It
will help all owners who are considering renovations and all Canadians who make major
household purchases.”
Mr. Lind said that the announcement in Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s Economic Statement
fully honours the Conservatives’ 2006 election commitment to reduce the GST by two per cent.
“We are pleased to congratulate a government that keeps its campaign promises.”
He welcomed transitional rules for the further 1 per cent reduction. This reduction applies to
homebuyers who purchase after October 30 and take possession after January 1, 2008. As well,
those who purchase before October 30 and take possession after January 1 will be able to apply to
Canada Revenue Agency for a transitional rebate that reflects the reduction to 5 per cent.

loob job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:50 PM   #53
MaDMaN_26
Powerplay Quarterback
 
MaDMaN_26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
so basically, if you make equal to or over $37,178 dollars you will save $185.89 a year in personal income tax... right?
__________________
______________________________________________
http://openmedia.ca/switch
MaDMaN_26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:52 PM   #54
MaDMaN_26
Powerplay Quarterback
 
MaDMaN_26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Also can some number guy help me understand what this means to the average joe?

- Basic personal exemption jumps to $9600 retoractive to Jan.1,'07
__________________
______________________________________________
http://openmedia.ca/switch
MaDMaN_26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:55 PM   #55
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDMaN_26 View Post
Also can some number guy help me understand what this means to the average joe?

- Basic personal exemption jumps to $9600 retoractive to Jan.1,'07
It means that you pay 0% income tax on the first $9600 that you earn in a year.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:58 PM   #56
Stranger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDogg View Post
Thats what I like too. Maybe the 5% rate will help us get rid of the stupid Penny once and for all. That should save the government (and taxpayers) some money over the long run.
This may be the govrnments plan. First we got to bone up on our seven and six times tables and now we get to practice our five times tables.
Stranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:59 PM   #57
MaDMaN_26
Powerplay Quarterback
 
MaDMaN_26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
It means that you pay 0% income tax on the first $9600 that you earn in a year.

ok, that makes sense... what did the number used to be?

Oh and since the 15% is on the first "Taxable" income then you'd have to be making $46,778.00 or more in order to realize the full $185.89 savings per year with .5% cut. ($37,178.00 + $9,600.00)
__________________
______________________________________________
http://openmedia.ca/switch

Last edited by MaDMaN_26; 10-31-2007 at 01:02 PM.
MaDMaN_26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 12:59 PM   #58
return to the red
Franchise Player
 
return to the red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
This may be the govrnments plan. First we got to bone up on our seven and six times tables and now we get to practice our five times tables.
that's funny coming from a guy with Ralph Wiggum in his avatar
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
return to the red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 01:23 PM   #59
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDMaN_26 View Post
ok, that makes sense... what did the number used to be?

Oh and since the 15% is on the first "Taxable" income then you'd have to be making $46,778.00 or more in order to realize the full $185.89 savings per year with .5% cut. ($37,178.00 + $9,600.00)
I think it was $8700 (give or take). No, the tax bracket is for the first $37,178. So if you made exactly $37178 in taxable income, you pay ($37178-$9600=$27,578*0.15=)$4,136.70 in taxes.

Under the previous system, you would pay (37178-$8700=$28478*0.155=)$4,414.09

So you would save a total of $277.39
albertGQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 01:26 PM   #60
ericschand
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDMaN_26 View Post
ok, that makes sense... what did the number used to be?

Oh and since the 15% is on the first "Taxable" income then you'd have to be making $46,778.00 or more in order to realize the full $185.89 savings per year with .5% cut. ($37,178.00 + $9,600.00)
What it means is that for the first $9,600 you make, you will pay no
federal taxes.

From $9600.01 to $37,178, you will pay 15%.
Then from $37,178.01 to $X, you pay a little more. And so on.

There are some very good tax calculators for Canadians at:
http://www.walterharder.com/index.asp

ers
ericschand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy