Turk plane hijacked in Greece

[Looger]

Originally Posted by White Doors

My posts after that quite clearly back up this claim.
If either of you dispute it, prove it.

nope.

YOU had a problem with MY post. YOU failed to address THAT problem, and tried to introduce a debate based on the two sides that YOU picked seemingly at random:

greece and turkey at war for thousands of years, and greece and turkey not being at war for thousands of years.

i didn't claim either side in your sick little game.

this has gone way past funny, and is now sad.

[White Doors]

I agree with the sad part Looger. I now have insight into your stubborness over facts, which is easily viewed, for everyone to see, in your illogical conclusions on the events of 9/11.

[Looger]

Originally Posted by White Doors

I agree with the sad part Looger. I now have insight into your stubborness over facts, which is easily viewed, for everyone to see, in your illogical conclusions on the events of 9/11.

wow.

another 9/11 mention.

duly noted.

[White Doors]

Wow, another non-answer. duly noted.

[Looger]

Originally Posted by White Doors

Wow, another non-answer. duly noted.

well, even i get tired of blasting your 'facts' out of the water.

oh that's right.

no greeks ever lived in asia minor. not in the 20th century.

oops! except for these ones:

http://www.answers.com/topic/turkey-1

Under a separate agreement negotiated at Lausanne in 1923, approximately 1.5 million Greeks living in Turkey were repatriated to Greece, and approximately 800,000 Turks living in Greece and Bulgaria were resettled in Turkey.

but these cultures were totally at war, constantly!

it's true, white doors says so!

yes, these cultures, these lands, these peoples have conquered each other many times over the millenia of recorded human history. only in your demented mind did i claim otherwise.

i was referring to the times in between the 'constant' strife, and even said so numerous times, like the FIRST time.

can we please, please, drop this? i didn't claim what you said i did. it's as simple as that.

[Red Mile Style]

Originally Posted by White Doors

Are you calling me a slut?

ha ha ha!

Nice one.

[Red Mile Style]

Originally Posted by Agamemnon

Wow... your debating style reminds me of 'I know you are but what am I'. You truly are a master debator.

Originally Posted by Agamemnon

This is how you 'refute' someone?

Originally Posted by Agamemnon

Sounds like the way my little 12 year old brother 'refutes' his friends claims... pretty immature. I'm not sure how I personally attacked you... I even called you a Master Debator.

Originally Posted by Agamemnon

Well... when I see someone lowering the character of the board through a highly immature 'I know you are but what am I' response, I feel compelled to point out that its not 'refutation', but wagging your mouth. I'm surprised you're challenging me for a point given your post I responded to had none, other than maintaining your board reputation.

Why do you feel the need to lower the level of debate by personally attacking the posters? Your comments have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, and you consistently hi-jack threads and turn them into a personal attack free-for-all. You haven't contributed anything to the thread either than your immature remarks that lead the thread completely off-topic.

While I rarely ever side with Whitedoors, I think he won this one by not acting like a tool and being forced to defend himself from you instead of sticking to the topic at hand. It's hard for anyone to take your side Agamemnon, regardless of how much merit your ideas have, because of the lack of respect you have for your fellow posters, may I suggest reading this thread:

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=30925

I'm not the only one who thinks you're lowering the standards of the forum.

[Agamemnon]

Originally Posted by Red Mile Style

While I rarely ever side with Whitedoors, I think he won this one by not acting like a tool and being forced to defend himself from you instead of sticking to the topic at hand. It's hard for anyone to take your side Agamemnon, regardless of how much merit your ideas have, because of the lack of respect you have for your fellow posters, may I suggest reading this thread:

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=30925

I'm not the only one who thinks you're lowering the standards of the forum.

If its the likes of you and White Doors that dislike me, then I must be doing everything right. Thanks for the validation, its always nice to hear from fans!

[longsuffering]

Originally Posted by Red Mile Style

While I rarely ever side with Whitedoors, I think he won this one by not acting like a tool and being forced to defend himself from you instead of sticking to the topic at hand.

White Doors ONLY knows how to act like a 'tool' and has done so (as usual) in this thread. If you don't see these posts as 'toolish' behavior, then you have no credibility to criticize.

Originally Posted by White Doors

Thanks Looger I'll take that as a retraction.

Originally Posted by White Doors

Did you have anything to add or are you just going to whine in the background?

Originally Posted by White Doors

ok then... thanks for coming out.
I corrected your error and you see neo-cons behind every corner.
haha

Originally Posted by White Doors

What are you the board referee?
Get over yourself.

I, for one, believes Agamemnon far more to a discussion that WD.

[Red Mile Style]

Originally Posted by Agamemnon

If its the likes of you and White Doors that dislike me, then I must be doing everything right. Thanks for the validation, its always nice to hear from fans!

Wow, I couldn't have proven my point better myself. The only role you take on this board is that annoying tattle-tale everyone would ignore and when he did somehow sneak his way into hanging out with the rest of the kids, they all hated him.

Why don't you just start acting your age?

Originally Posted by longsuffering

White Doors ONLY knows how to act like a 'tool' and has done so (as usual) in this thread. If you don't see these posts as 'toolish' behavior, then you have no credibility to criticize.

Regardless, he shouldn't have to be defending himself, he should just be talking about the topic of the thread. Maybe you don't agree with what WhiteDoors has to say, I almost never agree with him, but the least you should have is a common courtesy for other posters. When someone jumps into a thread to personally attack others' posts and does not add anything to the topic at hand, that ruins the thread and then the rest of the thread is spent attacking and defending... who wants to read that?!?!?

Originally Posted by longsuffering

I, for one, believes Agamemnon far more to a discussion that WD.

I wish this made coherant sense...

Just chalk this thread up to another one of Agamemnon's personal crusades to make this forum a joke.