Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2023, 10:00 AM   #41
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post

I wouldn't. I'd sooner keep Z and see if a fair contract can be worked out - or better yet, move him at the trade deadline.
Both 2024 UFAs. Both 2013 drafted. Middle sox forward for #5 D.


You can always sell duclair or sign him to a fair contract.


It's worth it alone if it gets huberdeau going.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:01 AM   #42
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
CP is going to melt down when the Hanifin deal goes down. The expectations here are seriously out of whack with reality.
1st + prospect or 1st + 2nd...I don't think that's out of whack with reality. Look at recent trades.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2023, 10:02 AM   #43
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod View Post
The sooner you all wrap your head around the fact there isn’t going to be a full on rebuild, the more these kinds of moves will make sense for you. I could see the Flames trading our guys for draft picks and then turning around and acquiring some players with the acquired picks. I’m hoping they get some decent players, and when the dust settles have an extra 1st in this years draft.
If the Flames keep turning their Ferrari's into paper clips, eventually this rebuild will be forced upon them and there is nothing they can do to change it.

The idea should be that they are preparing themselves and leveraging the veteran assets they have to try and make the rebuild as smooth as possible.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:02 AM   #44
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Sure, that'd be ideal, but what picks or prospects can Florida offer that would make the deal whole? They don't really have the pieces to do this if I'm being honest, but Luostarinen is a guy that could make sense.
Yeah it seems a tough deal to make from Calgary POV, the next first rounder Florida has is in 2026 I think the value of that is probably more like a late second rounder at this moment since it's so far down the road.

Luostarinen had a coming out party this year and is still under team control and cheap, that's why I don't think he would be available as an add. Also Zito mentioned he doesn't want to mess with the room much.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:02 AM   #45
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I don't see how a 1st + prospect or 1st + 2nd is out of whack with reality.

We are simply hoping management doesn't make a dumb, shortsighted move.
The list of teams that need a top-four LHD, can take on $4.75 mil next season and 7+mil going forward without shedding cap, and also have a 1st available and willing to trade is very small. And then there’s the matter of whether the Flames even want to take a step back or will try to make hockey trades instead.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:03 AM   #46
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Needs more Rooney to make it work.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:03 AM   #47
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Probably want him because of his past fit with Huberdeau.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:04 AM   #48
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Why? Do we hope to trade this 27 year old UFA and a 25 year old RFA for other assets? Why are we pushing this down the road?
Because we still need to ice an NHL lineup.

The offer Cali proposed is fine, maybe squeeze a 2nd rounder to Calgary too. I’m just tired of trading with them though. I hate losing trades to them. We probably should have them blocked after the Bennett and Tkachuk fleece.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2023, 10:05 AM   #49
Cycling76er
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Cycling76er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alan21 View Post
Send Bennett too!

No.
Cycling76er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:05 AM   #50
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The list of teams that need a top-four LHD, can take on $4.75 mil next season and 7+mil going forward without shedding cap, and also have a 1st available and willing to trade is very small.
$4.75 million is dead cheap for Hanifin. If any team wants to add any top 4 defenceman, that's virtually the minimum price they would be expecting to pay for him. So they would have the expectation built in that any team wanting a top 4 defenceman realizes that they don't have a $1 million cap hit.

+ the Flames can retain salary on Hanifin if they are smart.

+ the salary cap could be ging up by $8 million for the 2024-2025 season.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:06 AM   #51
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Not a huge fan of this potential move. If he was locked up long term maybe, even though he's not great he would be a solid 3rd liner who could fill in on the 2nd line and be on the 2nd PP unit, but bring him in for a year on a rebuilding team and give him lots of ice only benefits the player and increases his value.

Shouldn't be spending assets on guys in this contract situation unless you are 100% sure they will extend here
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:06 AM   #52
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The list of teams that need a top-four LHD, can take on $4.75 mil next season and 7+mil going forward without shedding cap, and also have a 1st available and willing to trade is very small.
It's not like the Flames couldn't afford to take on some short term cap dumps or retain salary to make a better trade work. The team's going to be flush with space after the exodus.

The only thing standing in the way is the "just try to sneak in" mentality we all fear is waiting around the corner.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:06 AM   #53
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Because we still need to ice an NHL lineup.

The offer Cali proposed is fine, maybe squeeze a 2nd rounder to Calgary too. I’m just tired of trading with them though. I hate losing trades to them. We probably should have them blocked after the Bennett and Tkachuk fleece.
Did our GM not just mention that he wants to give younger player a bigger shot/role out of camp?

Why are we using one of our two biggest trade chips to simply "ice an NHL lineup"?
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:07 AM   #54
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Duclair
Mathew Samoskevich RW (Florida's best prospect)
John Ludvig and Ludvig Jansson (RD and LD respectively with boom/bust potential. Lots of Ludvigs)
2026 1st

for

Noah Hanafin
Mikeal Backlund 50% retained (takes the place of Staal on the third line)

Improves Florida up the middle and on the LD, and leaves them enough cap space to be active in the FA market.

Calgary has a new best prospect, a future pick when Florida isn't as good and two defensive prospects where they are weak.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:07 AM   #55
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

I wouldn’t mind acquiring Duclair. But as a return for Hanifin it would be incredibly underwhelming. Here’s hoping it’s a deal involving Zadorov
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:09 AM   #56
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Did our GM not just mention that he wants to give younger player a bigger shot/role out of camp?

Why are we using one of our two biggest trade chips to simply "ice an NHL lineup"?
Because we’re also likely trading 3 other players, all 3 being forwards? You’re so fixated on one trade, we’re about to go full tear down and I’d like to at least have some reliable players in the lineup with at least one of our trades. And both players on reasonable deals.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2023, 10:10 AM   #57
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Please Flames. Make a trade so the collective fan base can have their serotonin dump.things are getting hairy around here.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2023, 10:11 AM   #58
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Because we’re also trading 3 other players, all 3 being forwards? You’re so fixated on one trade, we’re about to go full tear down and I’d like to at least have some reliable players in the lineup with at least one of our trades. And both players on reasonable deals.
I'm fixated on two trades - Lindholm and Hanifin - because they are by far our two biggest trading chips right now, and you can't sacrifice value on one of these trades simply because we need to "ice an NHL roster".

If you are trading these guys for a 27 and 25 year old, the Flames have failed, and it's just a lesser re-run of the Tkachuk trade.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2023, 10:13 AM   #59
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
CP is going to melt down when the Hanifin deal goes down. The expectations here are seriously out of whack with reality.
Are they? Most Flames fans are looking for a 2023 1st and a prospect.

Let's look at similar trades of top 4 dmen over the last couple years.

Provorov for 1st, 2nd (looking at just the Columbus pieces traded)

Orlov for 1st (assume other pieces were for Hathaway)

Chychrun for 1st, 2nd, 2nd

Hronek for 1st, 2nd

Ekholm for Barrie, 1st, Schaefer (2022 1st)

Romanov for 1st

Chiarot for 1st, Smilanic, 4th

Ristolainen for 1st, 2nd, Hagg

Jones + 1st for Boqvist, 1st, 1st, 2nd

Hanifin is one of the best d-man on that list. Chychrun probably better but hurt all the time. Similar to Ekholm but Hanifin is 7 years younger. Jones probably had more hype but really was overrated too. If the Flames allow Hanifin to negotiate an extension before making a deal then the return should be really strong.

If they can't get at least a 1st and a 2nd/prospect then it's a huge failure by Conroy.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-23-2023 at 10:22 AM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2023, 10:16 AM   #60
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
The list of teams that need a top-four LHD, can take on $4.75 mil next season and 7+mil going forward without shedding cap, and also have a 1st available and willing to trade is very small. And then there’s the matter of whether the Flames even want to take a step back or will try to make hockey trades instead.
Why’d Hanifin be worth a lot less than Provorov? He isn’t. This seems like a leak from Conroy to try and get Lindholm signed.
I’ll be expecting some crappy trades if Lindholm does sign to keep them in that sweet 16th overall pick range.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy