Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2022, 01:47 PM   #41
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
The fact the Flame recouped such high end assets out of this mess is something that cannot be allowed to slide (which was fantastic work). Signing Weegar gives the Flames another tremendous asset that they simply cannot afford to lose if they plan to capitalize on this window this season and beyond.
I am already on record with how stupidly myopic I believe this approach to be, but I am really interested to know from those who are already writing obituaries about Treliving's inability to re-sign his pending UFAs...

Specifically, what does this look like, in your estimation? Say Weegar is unsigned and the team does decide to move him before the TD. What is a realistic return? How does it make the team better sans Weegar? How does it affect their performance and on-ice results this season?


Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:48 PM   #42
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Colorado just let Kadri and Burakovsky walk, I am sure Sakic is feeling the heat by not trading them at the start of last season to maximize their chances of winning for several years. Those 1st round picks and prospects would have been huge for them this year.


__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:49 PM   #43
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Treliving has been facked over by geography so many times and still has a 100 point team...boggles the mind some still doubt him

If Weegar will take a fair deal it will get done, if 6.5+x8 isn't good enough for him its pretty hard to blame the GM. You cant just give a guy everything he wants.
You have to pay to get talent. Plain and simple. If you aren't paying a guy like Weegar who is capable of seriously moving the needle for this franchise, who are you paying instead, and why? It's also not at all like $6.5-$7M AAV is that ridiculous - the Flames can make it work and the cap will be going up. Now is the time to spend on an asset that completely fits and has the potential to provide excellent value.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 09-27-2022 at 01:52 PM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:53 PM   #44
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
This is a pretty standard negotiating tactic.
Exactly. Something that an inexperienced agent/lawyer/uncle with one client would do including whispering this intent into Elliott's ear.

Maybe Tre is trying to strongarm a newb agent or maybe he knows the comparables best and is holding to that and not overpaying. Likely both.

But one thing we know about Treliving is that he isn't afraid to loosen purse strings if he has to. I have a hard time believing Treliving is being cheap.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:54 PM   #45
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Whether Calgary signs Weegar to an extension is going to be a good measure of Treliving again, and whether he learns from situations. He nearly burned the team to the ground by misplaying the Gaudreau contract, which he would have been happy to sign before last season started for a reasonable value (less than what was on the table after the season). After Gaudreau bounced he had Tkachuk then decide he wanted out as well. What worked for the Flames advantage there was he had a Tkachuk to trade, and another dopey GM who believed he was getting a generational talent in return and gave up more than anyone else would have. The Flames got exceptionally lucky as they recouped some really good assets because they had something tangible to trade. They then got as lucky in being able to sign Kadri, but having to pay to move Monahan to do so. That was then, this is now.

Treliving is staring down the barrel of the exact same gun. Only this time the outcomes look different. He can sign Weegar to what will likely be a very reasonable long-term extension if rumors are accurate. Or he can somehow let this slide this slide int the season and watch the number grow if the Flames achieve the levels expected. If the contract slides and the Flames have another successful season with Weegar as a main part of that equation the potential to lose him increases. At best the contract numbers increase, likely making him too rich for the Flames' blood. Weegar would position himself to walk, which the Flames don't want and can't afford to have happen. Why would that be? Look at the blueline and the contract situations to figure it out.

The Flames don't have much on the blueline in the development pipeline. It is not like they have multiple players knocking at the door to backfill players as they leave. They also don't have many more trade chips left to play with, so a replay of this past summer is highly unlikely. The best play here is to get the contract done now and keep the team focused on winning rather than the concerns about a repeat of this summer. If Weegar is that Giordano level defenseman, then get him under contract and make the Tkachuk trade a landslide victory once and for all.
Are you okay?
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:54 PM   #46
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I am already on record with how stupidly myopic I believe this approach to be, but I am really interested to know from those who are already writing obituaries about Treliving's inability to re-sign his pending UFAs...

Specifically, what does this look like, in your estimation? Say Weegar is unsigned and the team does decide to move him before the TD. What is a realistic return? How does it make the team better sans Weegar? How does it affect their performance and on-ice results this season?


Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
I'm not really sure what you're asking as I'm not advocating Weegar is traded now or at any point. You have to sign him in the next 2 weeks. Full stop. If you don't, he's gone after the season because you're not moving him as a key piece of a team that will be at worst fighting for a playoff spot and at best, locking down the division again.

Things are only going to get worse contractually in the instance where he's not signed before the season. I would even argue that paying him $7.5M/8years isn't even a loss for the Flames with where the league economics are more than likely headed. I don't imagine Treliving is going down that road again and will likely save his best offer for closer to the end of camp, but whatever that is, it needs to be good enough to get pen to paper.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 09-27-2022 at 02:00 PM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 01:54 PM   #47
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Pushing for a deep playoff run >>>> asset management.
I am going to keep poking at this false dichotomy dvery time I see it. "Assettl management" has become shorthand for turning players on expiring contracts into draft/prospect capital, but it is really silly to promote the idea that this us the only way to effectively manage assets. In short, NacKenzie Weegar's 2022-23 season at a cap hit of $3.25 m is a tremendously valuable asset all on it's own, and the decision to maximize that value by keeping him on the roster for a strong season is a very good one.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2022, 02:00 PM   #48
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
You have to pay to get talent. Plain and simple. If you aren't paying a guy like Weegar who is capable of seriously moving the needle for this franchise, who are you paying instead, and why? It's also not at all like $6.5-$7M AAV is that ridiculous - the Flames can make it work and the cap will be going up. Now is the time to spend on an asset that completely fits and has the potential to provide excellent value.
This is what I am saying though, I think the Flames ARE offering 6.5-7Mx8 right now and I'm totally fine with it. If he doesn't sign that though how do you blame the GM exactly?

Like the Gaudreau situation the Flames are offering the most total dollars by a longshot...if the player won't sign it how on earth do you blame the GM/Organization
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:01 PM   #49
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

You play with the best team you can. If Weegar isn't signed and doesn't want the Flames' 6-7 mill after the season, someone else will.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2022, 02:04 PM   #50
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
This is what I am saying though, I think the Flames ARE offering 6.5-7Mx8 right now and I'm totally fine with it. If he doesn't sign that though how do you blame the GM exactly?

Like the Gaudreau situation the Flames are offering the most total dollars by a longshot...if the player won't sign it how on earth do you blame the GM/Organization
You go higher? We just don't know where either camp is at right now (aside from the fact that both want a long term commitment), but not spending an extra $1M/year (or whatever it is, but it can't be significantly higher) on him is going to get you what in the long run?

A Flames team possibly without Weegar next year is not nearly as formidable as it would be with him. Maybe some sort of miracle plays out after the season and he's re-signed, but I don't think anyone wants to bank on it and it will likely cost you more at that point than it will now anyway.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:06 PM   #51
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Well, then let's get him signed already lol

Seems like the two parties have been "close" for weeks and weeks now.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:06 PM   #52
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post

Like the Gaudreau situation the Flames are offering the most total dollars by a longshot...
True, but no other team is able to offer him anything right now.

But if he was a UFA, hard to know how much he'd be offered right now.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:07 PM   #53
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Playing the game to get closer to his demands
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:12 PM   #54
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
You go higher? We just don't know where either camp is at right now (aside from the fact that both want a long term commitment), but not spending an extra $1M/year (or whatever it is, but it can't be significantly higher) on him is going to get you what in the long run?

A Flames team possibly without Weegar next year is not nearly as formidable as it would be with him. Maybe some sort of miracle plays out after the season and he's re-signed, but I don't think anyone wants to bank on it and it will likely cost you more at that point than it will now anyway.
I think you should follow what it says in your avatar and keep calm. If it's going to get done it will, if its not its not. We don't know if its 1 million or 3 million its just making up scenarios to get upset about something that hasn't happened yet.

I do believe they will get a deal done.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:22 PM   #55
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

I hope we sign him, but I won’t be shocked if he doesn’t sign right away. Weegar subtracted from the original deal is still a fleece by Tre.

If all we get, worst case scenario, is one year of Weegar we are going to make sure we add additional top end player(s) on top of him for a great push. Then again, we’ll do that signed or not signed. I don’t fault him if he does want to wait. We would potentially be offering around double his salary, some dumb team out there probably will offer 2.5-3x the money if they’re desperate.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:25 PM   #56
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
This is what I am saying though, I think the Flames ARE offering 6.5-7Mx8 right now and I'm totally fine with it. If he doesn't sign that though how do you blame the GM exactly?
You don't blame the GM for the player not signing. You blame the GM for not turning an asset that has indicated he's not willing to negotiate any further into something that addresses the long-term needs of the team. If a player doesn't want to sign with you for the best offer you have on the table the only control mechanism you have left is to trade the player for assets you continue to have control over.

Quote:
Like the Gaudreau situation the Flames are offering the most total dollars by a longshot...if the player won't sign it how on earth do you blame the GM/Organization
If you know he isn't going to sign, trade him while you can and get good value for him. That is the control the GM has over this situation, so use it. There are teams that would give a good return for Weegar so make that happen if Weegar has indicated he will not accept your best offer. Personally I would prefer he is signed before the season starts, but if he pulls the same Gaudreau ####, send him packing as soon as possible. DON'T build up a case where the team is too reliant on the player to make a deal. Move him if yu are pushed into the corner.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2022, 02:30 PM   #57
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Absolutely not. Ridiculous take.

Unless the Flames aren't looking competitive. And then it's an entirely different situation, and trade away.
Exactly. Competitive playoff teams trade futures away at the deadline to add. They don't trade core pieces of their team away during a playoff push. That's just counter intuitive to your current season. If they were bubble team, or were out of the playoffs, then absolutely, trade away.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2022, 02:39 PM   #58
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Some people don't venture into mega threads like that because it's mostly arguing. I like something like this getting it's own thread, not like there's a limit to them
And when the new thread is created, we'll argue about whether it should have been created!
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:47 PM   #59
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
You play with the best team you can. If Weegar isn't signed and doesn't want the Flames' 6-7 mill after the season, someone else will.
Makar, right?
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2022, 02:50 PM   #60
Mindtravellee
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Exp:
Default

Is there any worry that he's only played 1 full season (not including the covid season). Is it only the last 2 years that he's made it? Is it worth rushing a $7 over 7?

I feel the Gudbranson contract has thrown everything out of whack
Mindtravellee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy