Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2022, 01:36 PM   #41
Flames_F.T.W
Scoring Winger
 
Flames_F.T.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Must be nice to be able to re-sign players 😕
Flames_F.T.W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:38 PM   #42
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Regardless of who’s at centre I think Johnny is going to have a hard time even flirting with the +64 he put up last year; liane is a tire fire on half of the ice surface and the BJ’s don’t really implore that same tactful checking brand of hockey Sutter was known for. I think Johnny will see a surge in PP points but a decrease in his overall effectiveness 5v5.
Johnny plus Laine is a defensive disaster. Johnny was playing better defensively, but it was more a matter of him getting closer to pulling his own weight, and being on a line with two players who were more than pulling their own weight, particularly Lindholm who was a Selke finalist.

This does still sting though. Watching Columbus sign their UFA winger, who was about to walk. Meanwhile, our UFA who said he wanted to sign is now leaving, because Gaudreau is gone.

Edit: I'm also not hyper confident that Gaudreau/Laine will put up massive numbers. In order to be effective in the past, Gaudreau has really required two linemates capable of taking the heat off him. In situations where he only had one good linemate, Gaudreau was easily double teamed and shut down.

Last edited by blankall; 07-22-2022 at 01:41 PM.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:41 PM   #43
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Chemistry is sometimes hard to predict. I still remember "Hull and Oates" and then "Gretzky and Hull".



This makes watching Gaudreau in Columbus a bit more interesting to say the least. I really wonder how they will do together. Gaudreau is smart enough to play with anyone, but can Laine stop being so lazy defensively to make this a good line? Wouldn't surprise me to see this line become a top line in the NHL, and it also wouldn't surprise me to see these two split up.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:42 PM   #44
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Very good signing. Don’t cheap out on the top guys, Laine will pay off for Jarmo.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 01:44 PM   #45
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
This does still sting though. Watching Columbus sign their UFA winger, who was about to walk. Meanwhile, our UFA who said he wanted to sign is now leaving, because Gaudreau is gone.
RFAs, not UFAs.
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to timun For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 01:44 PM   #46
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Seems like a hell of a lot to pay for him even before he has a likely Gaudreau-aided season.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:45 PM   #47
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Good for the Blue Jackets, as they've had far far worse trouble keeping free agents around than the Flames have... That said, that's a crapload of cap space on one of the most one-dimensional and streaky wingers in the league. Pretty nasty overpayment that I wouldn't be surprised they end up regretting immediately.
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:52 PM   #48
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
John and Laine together should be fun to watch.
But just think of the heavy lifting the other forward is going to have to do!

Gaudreau cleaned up a lot with Sutter, but he'll never be "good" in his own zone. He certainly got less bad.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:52 PM   #49
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Wow, that is just too much money. I figured the term would be 3 to 5 but in all cases it would have to start with a 7... this is almost 9.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 01:55 PM   #50
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
But just think of the heavy lifting the other forward is going to have to do!

Gaudreau cleaned up a lot with Sutter, but he'll never be "good" in his own zone. He certainly got less bad.
Yep. Somehow I doubt Brad Larsen is going to be able to get as much defense out of Johnny as Sutter.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:03 PM   #51
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky View Post
John and Laine together should be fun to watch.
They'll suck.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:04 PM   #52
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

That's about 2 mil too rich for Laine.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:05 PM   #53
OptimalTates
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Exp:
Default

Imagine someone telling us a team would be paying 18.5M for Gaudreau and Laine last offseason. It would not be believed. Gaudreau would be coming off 49 points (in 56 games) and Laine with 21 points (in 45 games).

Huge gamble paying two inconsistent players coming off career years while they were in the last year of their contracts. At least Laine's is shorter-term, but throw in 4M for Gudbranson too and 22.5M for those three players and this off-season has a huge chance to blow up in their face.

Also not sure of the real leadership in Columbus, but if they are forced to move a veteran like Nyquist and his "A" to get cap compliant, I'm not sure that's a particular strong locker-room.

Even if it does blow up in their face, which I think is more likely than not, I get it from Jarmo's position, and at least it was an exciting off-season for the fans. But so to was it when the Flames signed Neal.
OptimalTates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:09 PM   #54
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

I never understood why people thought 49 points in 56 games was bad production for Gaudreau.

That pro-rates to 72 points in 82 games. Not his very best, but hardly what I would call a "down year." From 2000 to 2012, Iginla scored fewer than 75 points six times.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 02:14 PM   #55
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

That's an overpayment, but good for Laine.

If he plays with JG that line is either going to score a ton of goals or give up a ton of goals. Or maybe both.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:21 PM   #56
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
I never understood why people thought 49 points in 56 games was bad production for Gaudreau.

That pro-rates to 72 points in 82 games. Not his very best, but hardly what I would call a "down year." From 2000 to 2012, Iginla scored fewer than 75 points six times.
Iginla was playing in the clutch and grab era, was one of the leaders in goals, and brought a lot more in terms of physicality, leadership, and intangibles than Iginla did. Gaudreau's contributions are almost entirely confined to getting points. When he's not doing that at a PPG, he becomes a liability on the ice.

Also, Iginla did put up 86-98 points in most prime years. In the down years when he was only putting up 70ish points, people were definitely on his case.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:26 PM   #57
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

It's laughable that anyone suggests this is an overpayment. One of the best finishers with one of the best setup men in the game? This is a huge win. Gaudreau and Tkachuk made Lindholm a Selke candidate, what are Gaudreau and Laine going to do with any center who knows where the defensive zone is? Huge potential.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:37 PM   #58
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
It's laughable that anyone suggests this is an overpayment. One of the best finishers with one of the best setup men in the game? This is a huge win. Gaudreau and Tkachuk made Lindholm a Selke candidate, what are Gaudreau and Laine going to do with any center who knows where the defensive zone is? Huge potential.
Gaudreau and Tkachuk made Lindholm a Selke candidate?

I get that a high octane line makes the defensive center accumulate the stats to win the award, but that's really cutting Lindholm's talents short.

They don't spend half of the time they did in the offensive one without him working the puck low.

Add in his ability to slip into the slot and finish and you have a player that is a huge factor in that lines success.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2022, 02:39 PM   #59
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
It's laughable that anyone suggests this is an overpayment. One of the best finishers with one of the best setup men in the game? This is a huge win. Gaudreau and Tkachuk made Lindholm a Selke candidate, what are Gaudreau and Laine going to do with any center who knows where the defensive zone is? Huge potential.

Made Lindholm a Selke candidate? That's a hot take. Gaudreau was almost, not quite, keeping his own defensively. He still had lots of support from Lindholm, not the other way around.

I do agree that Gaudreau/Laine is a potentially lethal combo though, offensively that is.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2022, 02:40 PM   #60
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Lindholm made Lindholm a Selke candidate.

He's been one of the better two-way centers for years, so to suggest anyone who even "knows where the defensive zone is" could come close is just ignorant.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy