Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2022, 06:05 PM   #41
OptimalTates
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Exp:
Default

Or the reportedly very injured player was injured I mean. But nevermind that one.
OptimalTates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 06:12 PM   #42
McG
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Elbows Up!!
Exp:
Default

Wonder if there was a NMC involved heh.

I say that only partially jokingly because of more favourable tax treatment in Vegas than Montreal; no way Weber turns this down. But I do wonder if NMCs take LTIR into consideration.
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player

Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.
McG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 06:16 PM   #43
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

It would be great if Weber after hearing the news of traded to Vegas , changed his mind and tried to comeback. I mean it would never happen but to see Vegas gm look if he heard Webber coming back would be priceless
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 06:22 PM   #44
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Don't see how this is circumventing anything. Vegas gives up a good player and gets nothing useful in return. It's the NMC that kills teams every time. Suck it Vegas.
How limited was Dadonov's list?
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 06:30 PM   #45
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Don't see how this is circumventing anything. Vegas gives up a good player and gets nothing useful in return. It's the NMC that kills teams every time. Suck it Vegas.
How limited was Dadonov's list?
Who puts Anaheim on their no-trade list but not Montreal?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 06:32 PM   #46
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Don't see how this is circumventing anything. Vegas gives up a good player and gets nothing useful in return. It's the NMC that kills teams every time. Suck it Vegas.
How limited was Dadonov's list?
It is totally cap circumvention. It is an NHL darling though so nothing. You can bet if BT tried this that would be when the NHL would crack down on it.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 06:50 PM   #47
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
Who puts Anaheim on their no-trade list but not Montreal?
It's the same list he gave to Ottawa last year. Montreal had just played in the Stanley Cup Final and Anaheim had just finished 30th out of 31 teams. Also, since it was Ottawa, he might have assumed they wouldn't trade with the Habs, so it would be a wasted spot to put them on the list.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 06:55 PM   #48
Tkachukwagon
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Tkachukwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1537562202474938369
Tkachukwagon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 06:55 PM   #49
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
I hate this trading LTIR crap.

They've got to fix this.

I agree. How about make GMs be more responsible rather than having these arbitrary rules how to get rid of cap.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:20 PM   #50
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
It is totally cap circumvention. It is an NHL darling though so nothing. You can bet if BT tried this that would be when the NHL would crack down on it.
They gave up a quality player for nothing ! Actually worst then nothing ! They have to still pay Weber !!

LV is worst today after this trade. I’m not sure what people are upset over

It’s not like they somehow kept the team together without trading anyone

If they traded Dadonov for a 7th people would be laughing and saying “stupid vegas had to give Dadonov away for nothing “ - we’ll they got less then nothing in this deal
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 07:25 PM   #51
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McG View Post
Wonder if there was a NMC involved heh.

I say that only partially jokingly because of more favourable tax treatment in Vegas than Montreal; no way Weber turns this down. But I do wonder if NMCs take LTIR into consideration.
I assume a Weber is not moving to Vegas, so he’ll be taxed based on where he is living.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:26 PM   #52
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Double post

GFG
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 06-16-2022 at 07:33 PM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:29 PM   #53
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
It is totally cap circumvention. It is an NHL darling though so nothing. You can bet if BT tried this that would be when the NHL would crack down on it.
Is it cap circumvention if Calgary traded Monny with a second round pick for a bag of chips?

Vegas paid a price to move a player with negative value, it’s done all the time.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 07:30 PM   #54
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Why are people mad Vegas lost a good player for nothing AND have to pay the salary of an injured player ?
They got out of a bad contract they just signed with zero hockey implications
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:32 PM   #55
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Is it cap circumvention if Calgary traded Monny with a second round pick for a bag of chips?

Vegas paid a price to move a player with negative value, it’s done all the time.
except they paid no price at all, no hockey asset
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:36 PM   #56
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Dadonov will like Montreal, they have a huge Russian community.

I think this off season is going to kick off a huge influx of Russian players to North America, btw. Those tax-free KHL salaries are only appealing if banks outside of Russia will touch the money.

I wonder if it makes more sense to keep Zadorov over Gudbranson - having one Russian regular in the lineup might make other Russians more willing to play here. Not the superstar ones, but the quality second tier of talent that didn’t become pro hockey players to stand in bread lines.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 07:38 PM   #57
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

No issue with stuff like this IMO

It actually hurts Vegas all off-season from a cap perspective the next couple seasons and it’s not like Weber is going to magically come back to the playoffs after not counting to the cap all season.

I could see Vegas paying a pick to try to flip Weber to Arizona now

$5M for Dadonov who had 43 points last year isn’t a terrible or bad contract either and with only 1 year the term is fine.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-16-2022 at 07:42 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 08:48 PM   #58
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
except they paid no price at all, no hockey asset
Dadonov is a decent player.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2022, 08:53 PM   #59
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Here we go with this circular discussion again.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2022, 09:04 PM   #60
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
They could have easily fixed it by simply ruling that it was cap circumvention to begin with, but once they let it happen a couple of times that precedent was set.
Are you sure anyone in the NHL actually understands the concept of precedent? DoPS certainly doesn't, nor do replay officials...


Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
They got out of a bad contract they just signed with zero hockey implications
Which contract is that? Dadanov was signed by OTT and VGK acquired him last off-season...the AAV isn't particularly bad, it's the $6.5M in cash that makes Dadanov's deal unattractive.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy