Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2021, 12:13 PM   #41
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I think Backlund will age well, and there will have to be other players blowing the doors wide open for the Flames to even think about exposing him.


Centres are extremely valuable commodities in the NHL. When you factor in Backlund's defensive game, plus how he still contributes on the scoresheet year in, year out with his utilization, I just think we are undervaluing him.


I like Lindholm. However, when Ward moved Linholm to centre in an attempt to fill-in Backlund's role, Lindholm didn't exactly succeed. I have always argued that having Backlund on the team allows for the other lines to get a lot more opportunities offensively as well.



I also think that Backlund is a very strong skater. I think he will continue aging well and will continue being a positive contributor at his cap hit.


I am fine running:
Monahan
Lindholm
Backlund
as the centre depth, and I am fine with running:
Monahan
Backlund
Bennett


Gaudreau - Monahan - Leivo/Simon/whomever - offensive first line

Tkachuk - Lindholm - Mangiapane - decent 2-way line (more offensive)

Bennett - Backlund - Dube - strong 2-way line (more defensive)

Lucic - Ryan - Nordstrom/whomever (should be capable of playing strong defence)


I like the look of that lineup.


Gaudreau - Monahan - Leivo/Simon/whomever - Offence

Tkachuk - Backlund - Lindholm - elite defensively and very good offensively

Mangiapane - Bennett - Dube - question mark, but should be a fast line - more offensive and will probably need some sheltering at least to start

Lucic - Ryan - whomever - capable 4th line


I think that the first lineup is probably a bit stronger and more versatile at the moment, but it really depends on how a Mangiapane - Bennett - Dube line look. If that is a real improvement on the Lucic - Bennett - Dube line while also being competent defensively, then that might be the better option.



Either way, the Flames have some depth this season - more than last season, and I was of the opinion that losing both Frolik and Jankowski (though relatively unpopular) was a blow to this team's depth and versatility. I think this team is better on forwards now than last season.


Defence pairings are going to be interesting to follow. The most sense from a 'win now' perspective is

Giordano - Tanev
Hanifin - Andersson
Valimaki - Nesterov/Kylington


That's kind of a weak bottom pairing considering NHL experience, but Valimaki is coming in looking really poised and ready for the NHL (and has SOME NHL reps under his belt), while Kylington I thought was ok for most of last season outside of his 2 horrendous games in a row. Nesterov seems likely to take that spot given his professional history, but who knows.


Giordano - Valimaki
Hanifin - Andersson
Kylington/Nesterov - Tanev


Love Valimaki, and I think playing next to Giordano will really help him develop, but that is still throwing him to the wolves expecting him to play on the top line right off the bat. Maybe he ends up getting there at some point this season, but I wouldn't throw him up there to start.


Giordano - Andersson
Hanifin - Valimaki
Kylington/Nesterov - Tanev


This is probably the 2nd best option IMO. More balanced bottom pairing, and doesn't throw Valimaki right to the wolves just yet. I would rather start Valimaki on the bottom pairing and let him work his way up.



I like the Depth that the Flames have right now. I would still much rather have Brodie over Tanev, but when looking at last season's roster, having Tanev + Valimaki > Brodie + Hamonic. I do think Hamonic was sort of disruptive on the backend defensively, and was too slow to transition. I am expecting Tanev to be better defensively, but still be a bit slow on the transition (hoping to be surprised). Hopefully each defence pairing can work well together. If so, then this will be an upgrade over last season's pairings (at least with Hamonic in the lineup).


My lineup of choice right now is:


Gaudreau - Monahan - Leivo (or someone fast who can get in on the forecheck and recover pucks, Leivo is a RHS which is just a bonus)
Tkachuck - Lindholm - Mangiapane
Bennett - Backlund - Dube
Lucic - Ryan - Nordstrom/Simon


Hopefully some chemistry starts developing with any changed lines. Flames really need to get out of the gate ready.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 12:18 PM   #42
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
#Flames making a few changes in group two, as well:

Tkachuk-Lindholm-Simon
Gaudreau-Monahan-Leivo
Zavgorodniy-Froese-Nordstrom
Rinaldo-Tuulola-Robinson

Hanifin-Andersson
Valimaki-Nesterov
Poolman-Yelesin

Rittich
Domingue

Last edited by sureLoss; 01-06-2021 at 12:21 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 12:28 PM   #43
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Especially the NTC part of his contract, no?
That's a limited NTC, not a NMC. He can be exposed, and based on his age and cap hit, probably should be. Even if he is selected, in a flat cap market, a comparable UFA will likely be available at a lower cap hit after the expansion draft. That's better than losing a young asset with a fair amount of team control remaining.

This is nothing against Backlund. I love him as a player. He's a player the Flames actually drafted and developed, and he bleeds red. But the final years of his contract will be an overpayment in the current market where similar players are signing for bargain basement prices due to every team being up against the flat cap, which won't be going up any time soon.

Last edited by Macindoc; 01-06-2021 at 12:42 PM.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 12:39 PM   #44
Ragnar
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Exp:
Default

I think the lines will be in a blender all year. With only 6 opponents Ward will probably tailor the line-up for each specific team we play. After playing Ottawa or Montreal or whoever 3-4 times we'll get a good idea of what works and what doesn't against each team.

For funsies though:

Tkachuk - Backlund - Lindholm
Gaudreau - Monahan - Bennett
Mangiapane - Ryan - Leivo
Lucic - Dube - Simon

I think Dube has the tools to be an effective center in the NHL after a wee bit more experience, eventually supplanting Ryan and Backlund. Braydon Point lite.
Ragnar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 12:50 PM   #45
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

If the blender stopped there, I would be pretty happy with it (though of course it won't):

Tkachuk-Lindholm-Simon
Gaudreau-Monahan-Leivo
Mangiapane-Backlund-Ryan
Lucic-Bennett-Dube
Nordstrom/whoever

Giordano-Tanev
Hanifin-Andersson
Valimaki-Nesterov
Mackey-Kylington
Petrovic

Markstrom
Rittich

deepest team in a long time
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 12:53 PM   #46
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnar View Post
I think the lines will be in a blender all year. With only 6 opponents Ward will probably tailor the line-up for each specific team we play. After playing Ottawa or Montreal or whoever 3-4 times we'll get a good idea of what works and what doesn't against each team.

For funsies though:

Tkachuk - Backlund - Lindholm
Gaudreau - Monahan - Bennett
Mangiapane - Ryan - Leivo
Lucic - Dube - Simon

I think Dube has the tools to be an effective center in the NHL after a wee bit more experience, eventually supplanting Ryan and Backlund. Braydon Point lite.
That is a great point, and one we can very much expect.

Two significant factors at play:
1) only 6 opponents
2) a taxi squad of extra players

So the sensible strategy for this season is to build 6 team-specific lineups (injuries will of course be a major factor as well).
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:06 PM   #47
EVERLAST
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Tuulola is in camp? Wow. I hope he progresses some how some way.

Pretty exciting having all these bodies in Camp seeing who works out thru competition and meritocracy as it should be .

What i really like this year is our goalies and how they'll push each other hopefully. Hopefully Rittich learns more as it sounds as if he was a sore spot in the bubble after the pause.
EVERLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:07 PM   #48
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson View Post
I understand that some people want Lindholm back at RW, but this is illogical, my friend. If that happens, who is the second NHL center in the second group? Tell me who the center is in this group of players: Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Simon, Leivo and Nordstrom.
The second group is not a viable NHL team. The Flames need to get the NHL team together and get ready for the regular season. 7 more training camp days and a travel day.

Keeping the AHL guys in the mix makes no sense. The Flames should have a 26 man go to war group focused on getting out of the gate as best as possible.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:08 PM   #49
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
The second group is not a viable NHL team. The Flames need to get the NHL team together and get ready for the regular season. 7 more training camp days and a travel day.

Keeping the AHL guys in the mix makes no sense. The Flames should have a 26 man go to war group focused on getting out of the gate as best as possible.
Is that your opinion from your extensive years of coaching hockey players at the professional level?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wastedyouth For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 01:24 PM   #50
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I love the focus on building 4 lines that you can roll during 5v5 play. I've wanted them to take this approach for years, but I suppose having Jankowski/Neal/Rinaldo/Brouwer as every day players has always made it impossible.

Bringing in (hopefully) good utility players that can be plugged in the line-up anywhere could be a huge step forward for this team. Leivo and Simon are both looking to establish themselves as more than they have been before, and both already boast solid 2-way games. This is a huge step forward compared to paying $4.5M to Brouwer or $5.75M to Neal - veterans who "earned" their big pay day but had been left in the dust by the game.

Tkachuk - Lindholm - Leivo
Gaudreau - Monahan - Simon
Mangiapane - Backlund - Bennett
Lucic - Ryan - Dube

or

Tkachuk - Lindholm - Simon
Gaudreau - Monahan - Leivo
Mangiapane - Backlund - Ryan
Lucic - Bennett - Dube

Both look good to me. Roll them all night and push the pace. I'm still holding out hope that we see Tkachuk - Bennett - Lindholm at some point, but as is I like the approach from a line-up perspective.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:24 PM   #51
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
If the blender stopped there, I would be pretty happy with it (though of course it won't):

Tkachuk-Lindholm-Simon
Gaudreau-Monahan-Leivo
Mangiapane-Backlund-Ryan
Lucic-Bennett-Dube
Nordstrom/whoever

Giordano-Tanev
Hanifin-Andersson
Valimaki-Nesterov
Mackey-Kylington
Petrovic

Markstrom
Rittich

deepest team in a long time
Not a fan of Simon on that top line. Rather Dube or Bennett there myself.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 01:34 PM   #52
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Agreed with exception to the "big" statement. Backlund's contract and age makes him less likely to get selected, than say a young player with lots left to prove.
If left unprotected, Backlund would likely be the best available forward. He is not overpaid, and is under contract for three years after expansion. If he is available then he is getting selected, and that would suck only unless one of the young players makes a major breakthrough.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:46 PM   #53
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Not a fan of Simon on that top line. Rather Dube or Bennett there myself.
Wait a day or two then.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:52 PM   #54
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
now
#Flames head coach Geoff Ward says he hasn’t decided how to integrate WJC participants Jakob Pelletier, Connor Zary, and Dustin Wolf into camp.

Says they won’t be a part of tomorrow’s intra-squad game, which means they wouldn’t be available until Saturday at the earliest.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:54 PM   #55
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Back to lines. I think Mangiapane-Backlund-Ryan is a fine line defensively with an offensive pop when you can match at home. On the road? This line gets creamed.
When you say "fine" line defensively, do you mean satisfactory or average, but not great or maybe not even good?
Just curious in regard to the "creamed" portion.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:57 PM   #56
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
When you say "fine" line defensively, do you mean satisfactory or average, but not great or maybe not even good?
Just curious in regard to the "creamed" portion.
Fine, meaning I would be comfortable with them on the ice in a shutdown role.

Creamed, as in opposing coaches could put larger lines out against them, control matchups so they wouldn't have the opportunity to stifle offense.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2021, 02:08 PM   #57
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
If the blender stopped there, I would be pretty happy with it (though of course it won't):

Tkachuk-Lindholm-Simon
Gaudreau-Monahan-Leivo
Mangiapane-Backlund-Ryan
Lucic-Bennett-Dube
Nordstrom/whoever

Giordano-Tanev
Hanifin-Andersson
Valimaki-Nesterov
Mackey-Kylington
Petrovic

Markstrom
Rittich

deepest team in a long time
Nice line up, I like the idea of keeping the Bennett playoff line together, and stacking that third line with middle six (thats closer to second line) skill with Ryan on the right side.

It hasn't been talked about much, but I'm really really excited to see Nesterov-Valimaki in action.

So many storylines and players/combinations to watch for on opening night.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 02:47 PM   #58
CF84
Powerplay Quarterback
 
CF84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Fine, meaning I would be comfortable with them on the ice in a shutdown role.

Creamed, as in opposing coaches could put larger lines out against them, control matchups so they wouldn't have the opportunity to stifle offense.
Well, that would be quite the change for a team that always seems to do well on the road, only to follow it up by stinking it up during the home games. Also, that does not at all strike me as a line that would have trouble with a tough match-up.

When has a line centered by Backlund ever had a difficult time with tough match-ups? I don't remember so I am actually curious. Ryan has always seemed defensively responsible and Mangiapane won't quit chasing the puck.

I think they could be a really good line...even with the odds stacked against them. I'm not sure it would be my first choice for a line, but I also think they would be one of the lines that fans wouldn't need to worry about during away games.

Last edited by CF84; 01-06-2021 at 03:05 PM. Reason: Double-spacing OCD
CF84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 03:05 PM   #59
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Simon = Pelletier and I like these lines.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 03:14 PM   #60
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
If left unprotected, Backlund would likely be the best available forward. He is not overpaid, and is under contract for three years after expansion. If he is available then he is getting selected, and that would suck only unless one of the young players makes a major breakthrough.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Text, I really do mean this, it has been a lot of fun debating this with you this off season.

I think i've said my piece, so I'll save the rest for next off season.

I'm glad we can debate some less hypothetic stuff in the next few weeks.

Cheers
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy