10-10-2020, 02:56 PM
|
#41
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
I think this signing is more a depth move. If Rittich and or Markstrom injuries occur, I think they want to have a little bit of experience.
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:57 PM
|
#42
|
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Would this not be the answer of who to expose in the expansion draft?
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:57 PM
|
#43
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
|
1 year deal means that he doesn't meet the criteria for the expansion exposure. Expect to see one more goalie signed some time this year.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Chingas For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:57 PM
|
#44
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack
Arizona you mean right ?
|
NJ is this neighborhood in Phoenix that people who hate NY and like gardens live in
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crown Royal For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:58 PM
|
#45
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingas
1 year deal means that he doesn't meet the criteria for the expansion exposure. Expect to see one more goalie signed some time this year.
|
Parsons and Zagidulin already meet expansion requirements, they only need to be RFAs
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:58 PM
|
#46
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Rittich is leaving and we need insurance and expansion draft fodder?
|
This has got to be the only logical explanation. Treliving said it himself a year ago: By not re-signing Smith, Rittich was given a signal and a chance to become a starter. Rittich wasn't ready. Now, with Markstrom's 6-yr contract, what chances does Rittich have to become a starter in Calgary? So, very likely, Rittich is upset, unhappy and want's out to a team that needs a starter.
What is really head-scratching, Domingue is not good even as a back-up goalie. Didn't he have the worst stats in the NHL last season?
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 02:59 PM
|
#47
|
|
Franchise Player
|
So the organization in net now...
Markstrom
Rittich
Domingue
Parsons
Zagidulin
Wolf
Chechelev
did I miss anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:00 PM
|
#48
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904
This is about Parsons and his ongoing injuries.
|
Fixed.
Hard to have much hope in Parsons when all he does is get injured it seems. I hope he proves me wrong but he hasn't even shown the ability to play a full season of AHL hockey.
Domingue is good depth and can be an NHL backup if needed.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:00 PM
|
#49
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Would this not be the answer of who to expose in the expansion draft?
|
Anyone not named Markstrom, Wolf or Chechelev will be exposed IIRC. Domingue will be a UFA, same as Rittich
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:01 PM
|
#50
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Probably has more to do with Parsons than Rittich.
Rittich is career .908. Domingue is career .904, albeit with a LOT of AHL time. Seems obvious Domingue would be significant downgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:01 PM
|
#51
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Would this not be the answer of who to expose in the expansion draft?
|
Parsons and Rittich are already the answer to that.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:02 PM
|
#52
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
This has got to be the only logical explanation. Treliving said it himself a year ago: By not re-signing Smith, Rittich was given a signal and a chance to become a starter. Rittich wasn't ready. Now, with Markstrom's 6-yr contract, what chances does Rittich have to become a starter in Calgary? So, very likely, Rittich is upset, unhappy and want's out to a team that needs a starter.
What is really head-scratching, Domingue is not good even as a back-up goalie. Didn't he have the worst stats in the NHL last season?
|
Parsons is injured and they will have a condensed AHL sked w/ some 3 in 3s and want 3 goalies there.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:02 PM
|
#53
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Parsons and Zagidulin already meet expansion requirements, they only need to be RFAs
|
OK that's good news. I was under the impression that there were some minimum games played criteria as well.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:03 PM
|
#54
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Word is Domingue is epitome of a great teammate.
|
Pie in the sky.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:03 PM
|
#56
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Parsons and Zagidulin already meet expansion requirements, they only need to be RFAs
|
According to CapFriendly Zag is exempt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Anyone not named Markstrom, Wolf or Chechelev will be exposed IIRC. Domingue will be a UFA, same as Rittich
|
UFA's count for expansion exposure. Remember Vegas took pending UFA Engelland from the Flames in the last expansion draft.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:04 PM
|
#57
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo
Why do we need 3 goalies in the AHL?
|
Maybe we actually are trading Rittich.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:05 PM
|
#58
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
According to CapFriendly Zag is exempt.
UFA's count for expansion exposure. Remember Vegas took pending UFA Engelland from the Flames in the last expansion draft.
|
My mistake on Zag, forgot the 2 years thing. Thanks for the correction.
I know UFAs are exposed, but they don't count towards the expansion requirements, which is why I singled them out as UFAs.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:06 PM
|
#59
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
According to CapFriendly Zag is exempt.
UFA's count for expansion exposure. Remember Vegas took pending UFA Engelland from the Flames in the last expansion draft.
|
It is not for exposure though. I believe they have to have atleast one goalie signed to a contract that is exposed. Didn’t flames sign Tom McCollum for this exact reason last time?
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 03:07 PM
|
#60
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati
It is not for exposure though. I believe they have to have atleast one goalie signed to a contract that is exposed. Didn’t flames sign Tom McCollum for this exact reason last time?
|
For goalies you just need an RFA, we signed McCollum because we didn't have anyone that was a 3+ year pro to expose; everyone was a 1-2 year pro or a UFA
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crown Royal For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|
|
