Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2018, 07:18 AM   #41
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

Pacioretty, with the exception of last year, was a perennial 30 goal man. I think he's top 5 for most even strength goals the last 5 or so seasons. Tatar was a healthy scratch for the Knights. Is Suzuki that good?

I hate the way Montreal has treated their captain the last year or so. I bet he signs an extension and does great in zero pressure Vegas.

Vegas gets the better player, but Bergevin actually gets a few pieces that might help. I don't know if I like it, hate it.... Vegas is playing for now on this deal. If they go all the way this year, it might be great for them.
habernac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:30 AM   #42
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

John Lu

Verified account

@JohnLuTSNMtl
34s35 seconds ago
More
#Habs Bergevin says Pacioretty asked for a trade last season but adds that at the time he did not tell his captain that he had intentions of dealing him away.
habernac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:36 AM   #43
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Really depends if Vegas can get him for less than 6 years, less than ~6 per. Basically look at JVR's deal and knock off a mil AAV or so.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:37 AM   #44
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Really depends if Vegas can get him for less than 6 years, less than ~6 per. Basically look at JVR's deal and knock off a mil AAV or so.
He already reportedly turned down a 6x6 from the Kings. Don't think he is going to sign for less than that.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:41 AM   #45
ST20
Crash and Bang Winger
 
ST20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
I think both teams got weaker by making this deal. I honestly don't see a winner and only see a couple of losers. Still trying to figure out why either team would make this deal?
I agree. Between this and the Tatar trade Vegas is really gambling away their future on something that could've been a fluke.

I don't know how Bergevin still has a job either. Prices's window is definitely closed I can't imagine he wants to waste away in MTL at this point.

That being said VGK is better off today and that sucks for the flames.
ST20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:45 AM   #46
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Suzuki has a lot of potential to make this look very silly pretty quickly.

As much as Vegas wanted Max, Montreal should have been more desperate to get a return for him before he walks. Would have to think that Bergevin was willing to accept much less, but he's also the kind of GM that would let a player walk rather than accept a trade that makes him look bad. We've been hearing of Max on the move for a while now, so it'd be interesting to see what Bergevin was asking of other teams around the league.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 07:45 AM   #47
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
He already reportedly turned down a 6x6 from the Kings. Don't think he is going to sign for less than that.
True... but wasn't that at the draft? They can now point to that JVR contract and say, "look, this guy's a year younger than you'll be going into your next contract and coming off a 36 goal season, and this is what he got on the open market. You just scored 37 points. And you want the same contract as him?" It's just not reasonable.

I guess they could let the season play out and let him earn his money, if he can.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 08:21 AM   #48
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VANFLAMESFAN View Post
Forsberg for Erat.

Case closed.
Glencross for whatever we got from the Caps!
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2018, 08:26 AM   #49
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
So McPhee turns 2 x firsts (including a high first) and 3 x seconds - pretty much all the picks he gained from all the wheeling and dealing around the expansion draft - into a year of a 29 year old Pacioretty. That's embarassing.
He got Tatared and feathered in that trade with the wings.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 08:28 AM   #50
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1039137807225126914
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 08:32 AM   #51
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Las Vegas looking strong again next year.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 08:58 AM   #52
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
This is good return for Montreal IMO.

Tatar was bad post trade but is a 20-25 goal guy in his own right.

Suzuki has been tearing up the OHL and ranked 30th in the Athletics top 50 prospects. (More value than getting a 1sr for 2019 from Vegas for sure).

2nds always carry some value.

Reminds me a bit of the Duchene trade - Ottawa paid a ton to upgrade Turris to Duchene, Vegas paid a ton to upgrade Tatar to Pacioretty.

Also makes no sense since they were supposedly hesitant to move their top prospects (Glass/Suzuki) for Karlsson.
I never said it was a bad trade for Montreal, but it's frustrating to see a team in our division get better for this season.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:10 AM   #53
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Regardless of what they paid for him at the deadline, Tatar didn't fit in in Vegas. Basically, they lost nothing from their roster and added a 30 goal scorer. I hate this trade...

I'd rather Vegas make trades like the first Tatar trade. :/
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:11 AM   #54
Young_Guns
Scoring Winger
 
Young_Guns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST20 View Post
I agree. Between this and the Tatar trade Vegas is really gambling away their future on something that could've been a fluke.

I don't know how Bergevin still has a job either. Prices's window is definitely closed I can't imagine he wants to waste away in MTL at this point.

That being said VGK is better off today and that sucks for the flames.
MTL cleaning house. Flames should make a pitch for Price.
Frolik, Bennett, Gillies + a pick for Price (and some salary retained)?
Young_Guns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:14 AM   #55
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_Guns View Post
MTL cleaning house. Flames should make a pitch for Price.
Frolik, Bennett, Gillies + a pick for Price (and some salary retained)?
Please leave the embarrassing trade proposals on HFboards.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2018, 09:17 AM   #56
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I also think Montreal won this.... considering they had Patches for like 8 or 9 months and he clearly wasn't going to re-sign and he declined pretty massively last year (who knows if he'll rebound as he's about to turn 30).

Tatar has been a pretty consistent 20 goal guy and he's younger, they got a blue chip prospect IMO and a 2nd?

Seems like a desperation move by McPhee, one of those ones where they've convinced themselves they "have a window" and start overspending on vets to plug holes like when the Jays traded Syndergaard and D'Arnaud for J.A. Dickey.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:19 AM   #57
habernac
Franchise Player
 
habernac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sector 7G
Exp:
Default

Pacioretty isn't 45 years old.
habernac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:19 AM   #58
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Over the past 4 seasons, Tatar has never scored less than 20 goals and has averaged 23.75 goals/season. Pacioretty is a 30 goal scorer instead of a 20 goal scorer, but is 2 years older and is going to be very expensive in his 30s (turned down 6*6). Meanwhile, the Habs get a 2019 2nd and Suzuki, a great CENTRE prospect.

I hate most deals Bergevin makes, but this one seems like a good bet.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:19 AM   #59
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Young_Guns View Post
MTL cleaning house. Flames should make a pitch for Price.

Frolik, Bennett, Gillies + a pick for Price (and some salary retained)?
There are eight-years remaining on that contract. No thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2018, 09:21 AM   #60
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

It makes sense for Pacioretty to sign now. If he has another 30-40 point, 15 goal season suddenly he's 30 years old and last season isn't an outlier. He could cost himself a lot of money by going to free agency.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy