Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2018, 07:14 PM   #41
CF84
Powerplay Quarterback
 
CF84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The real "Cowtown"
Exp:
Default

It's the jersey.

The team thought they would be playing in an amazing retro jersey this year and still haven't fully recovered from the disappointment.

Tkachuk likes the new jersey though.
CF84 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CF84 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2018, 07:18 PM   #42
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Boring teams are sometimes SC worthy. See the Devils.
'Boring and successful' is a whole other animal from 'boring and bad.'

If the Flames were terribly boring but won a Cup I think people would be significantly more forgiving than being boring and missing the playoffs.

Thats just....well thats just the Jacques Lemaire Minnesota Wild.

It almost lost Minnesota their second team.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2018, 07:27 PM   #43
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

The rebuild was fun up to GG.

I’d bite my tongue if they were a powerhouse, but they are just as bad without the fun.

I’ve said it many times; this is entertainment. They can’t control the result, they can control the entertainment value though.

I guess the other thing that ails us is no cheerleaders and not enough pyrotechnics.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 07:30 PM   #44
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Only one actual good offensive player. Assuming you mean Gaudreau. Tkachuk is already in the conversation to be considered as valuable as Gaudreau. Monahan has 29 and Ferland has 20. Jankowksi has 11 as a rookie. Sure we’re not Tampa but saying only one good offensive player is a stretch. Look at what kind of offensive production Backlund provided last year.



Setting the goal posts right at the line after Gaudreau, Ferland, Kulak, and Jankowski were drafted and before we see what we truly have in Kylington, Andersson, Fox, Valimaki, Dube, Mangiapane, Gillies, and Parsons.
Monahan can finish but he cannot be relied upon to drive a line, especially a first line. Perhaps it is GG's system but Monahan has never taken over a game this year. Gaudreau takes over games and uses Monahan to put pucks in. He is a very good player but I believe Backlund and Tkachuk coould generate more offense than him if given the same opportunity.

Ferland is a good player too but this will almost surely be his career season, and Janko is too old to get a lot better than he is. The #1c in waiting aura is definitely not there anymore.

I set the post before Kulak and Janko were drafted. They're both NHLers but not even close to being impact guys. The 2013 draft was a total failure (though the other players available are not world beaters), 2014 was awful.

2015, 2016, 2017 look alright, but none of the Flames drafted there are looking like impact guys. Maybe Andersson and Valimaki., but knowing the Flames I'm not liking their odds.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world

Last edited by bigrangy; 03-03-2018 at 07:35 PM.
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 07:42 PM   #45
JohnnyB
Franchise Player
 
JohnnyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Shanghai
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Boring teams are sometimes SC worthy. See the Devils.
I'm not on the team. I'm just watching.
__________________

"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"
JohnnyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 07:52 PM   #46
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
wranglers

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
Monahan can finish but he cannot be relied upon to drive a line, especially a first line. Perhaps it is GG's system but Monahan has never taken over a game this year. Gaudreau takes over games and uses Monahan to put pucks in. He is a very good player but I believe Backlund and Tkachuk coould generate more offense than him if given the same opportunity.

Ferland is a good player too but this will almost surely be his career season, and Janko is too old to get a lot better than he is. The #1c in waiting aura is definitely not there anymore.

I set the post before Kulak and Jankowski were drafted. They're both NHLers but not even close to being impact guys. The 2013 draft was a total failure (though the other players available are not world beaters), 2014 was awful.

2015, 2016, 2017 look alright, but none of the Flames drafted there are looking like impact guys. Maybe Andersson and Valimaki., but knowing the Flames I'm not liking their odds.
So Monahan is a very good player now, mostly just offensive output, but before he wasn't a good offensive player?

Jankowski is too old to get better? Ummm, he's a 23 year old rookie.

Ferland is definitely post-apex at 25.

Kulak and Jankowski are both rookies. Not every 'impact' player in the league was so in their rookie season.

Hopefully we can trade all of our non impact players leaving us with just Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Giordano. Then we can perhaps draft some impact guys in the next few drafts. That'll fix the ails.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 08:03 PM   #47
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default What ails the Flames?

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Hopefully we can trade all of our non impact players leaving us with just Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Giordano. Then we can perhaps draft some impact guys in the next few drafts. That'll fix the ails.

I know you’re being smarmy and sarcastic but I’m sure I’m not the only one who would be ok with this plan. I’d even put Gio on the table if the price was right.

Everything about this franchise and its 30-year reign of suck has to be critically evaluated, including the players who are emblematic of its “ok, but not great” culture.

Last edited by mrdonkey; 03-03-2018 at 08:07 PM.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 08:04 PM   #48
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral View Post
It bothers me this season that they lost to bottom feeders at home - most recently yesterday. It bothered me more how many posters on CP shrugged those losses off in January as nothing to worry about .... lots of games left ... blah blah blah ... and it bothers me to think that the Flames thought likewise.

Do something to change this mentality.

I was one that heard you when you brought it up before and I do agree, the players in so many ways dictated the outcome. These guys are not playing for the coach, which is the reason I doubt they win any games against the oilers this season. This is not a team that appears to be playing for each other and the coach.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 08:20 PM   #49
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
I know you’re being smarmy and sarcastic but I’m sure I’m not the only one who would be ok with this plan. I’d even put Gio on the table if the price was right.

Everything about this franchise and its 30-year reign of suck has to be critically evaluated, including the players who are emblematic of its “ok, but not great” culture.
There was a break during the Darryl Sutter era when he said outright that "Good is not good enough". His mentality seemed to work its way down throughout the team.

The country-club atmosphere returned pretty quickly after Sutter left. I am not saying Sutter wasn't without his faults, but he certainly had some strengths that I think are now missing at the top.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 09:10 PM   #50
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
I know you’re being smarmy and sarcastic but I’m sure I’m not the only one who would be ok with this plan. I’d even put Gio on the table if the price was right.

Everything about this franchise and its 30-year reign of suck has to be critically evaluated, including the players who are emblematic of its “ok, but not great” culture.
I'd be curious too what this team could look like if you set Gaudreau, Tkachuk, Jankowski, Hamilton, and Hamonic aside and moved everyone else for the best haul you could. Keeping 2 of our 3 young goalies and the rest of our prospects as well. Would we be on a better path? Perhaps.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 10:01 PM   #51
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

IMO, the problem stems from constantly using the Oilers as a measuring stick. They've been absolutely brutal for 20 years but we feel successful even if we miss the playoffs cause we finished better than their group of flashy first round picks. If that silver lining didn't exist, I think fan frustration would have boiled over years ago with constantly being a bubble team and we wouldn't be so accepting of mediocrity.
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to burnitdown For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2018, 10:31 PM   #52
Pointman
#1 Goaltender
 
Pointman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
A decent run and gun roster....

.... trying to grind out pseudo-physical wins for a stubborn coach trying to appease a pseudo-Modern GM who pays lip service to what works and then acts the opposite as he attempts to appease a Neanderthal POHO who is out of touch with the game while trying to appease a fanbase that is out of touch with what a winning team looks due to the exaggerated makeup of one team in one run over a decade ago while enabling an ownership group that wouldn't sacrifice a season or two of asset building if it meant a slight off chance of the revenue of two home playoff games.

... But mostly the stubborn coach.
Agree with everything except the make-up of 2004 Flames. That was a very fast team, widely considered one of the fastest in the NHL. It was also very deep, that bottom six would destroy current bottom six. I mean Yelle would eat Janko for breakfast and the footrace between Lombardi and Stajan would look embarrassing.

Then after the lockout they had become getting more and more top-heavy and slow.

Last edited by Pointman; 03-03-2018 at 10:43 PM.
Pointman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pointman For This Useful Post:
JD
Old 03-03-2018, 10:56 PM   #53
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman View Post
Agree with everything except the make-up of 2004 Flames. That was a very fast team, widely considered one of the fastest in the NHL. It was also very deep, that bottom six would destroy current bottom six. I mean Yelle would eat Janko for breakfast and the footrace between Lombardi and Stajan would look embarrassing.

Then after the lockout they had become getting more and more top-heavy and slow.
Lombardi was incredibly fast that is hardly a fair comparison...Stajan had a far better NHL career. Sure Lombardi in his absolute prime is better than Stajan now. Yelle had 4 goals in 03-04 I think you are remember things with rose colored glasses.

Calgary had the best goalie and best forward in the world at that time...they drug a bunch of scrubs within an inch (or less) of the cup.

That being said Calgary could use some speed in the bottom six for sure
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2018, 11:03 PM   #54
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Lombardi was incredibly fast that is hardly a fair comparison...Stajan had a far better NHL career. Sure Lombardi in his absolute prime is better than Stajan now. Yelle had 4 goals in 03-04 I think you are remember things with rose colored glasses.

Calgary had the best goalie and best forward in the world at that time...they drug a bunch of scrubs within an inch (or less) of the cup.

That being said Calgary could use some speed in the bottom six for sure

Agreed, our fastest bottom 6 player was scratched the last 2 games. Puzzling.

Edit: not that it would have tipped the scales but this team needs more youth, skill, energy and speed in the bottom 6 and they have a player that checks 3 of those boxes

Last edited by Samonadreau; 03-03-2018 at 11:11 PM.
Samonadreau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2018, 11:12 PM   #55
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointman View Post
Agree with everything except the make-up of 2004 Flames. That was a very fast team, widely considered one of the fastest in the NHL. It was also very deep, that bottom six would destroy current bottom six. I mean Yelle would eat Janko for breakfast and the footrace between Lombardi and Stajan would look embarrassing.

Then after the lockout they had become getting more and more top-heavy and slow.
Golden Knight's Remind me of 2004 Flames
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2018, 11:17 PM   #56
wired
Powerplay Quarterback
 
wired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Strathmore
Exp:
Default

The coach has lost the team.
The best players on the team, are not playing better than the 3rd line players. (IMO)
Sit the players that do not show the desire to compete in every game.(JG and Money included)
Never play Stajan again.
It seems no team in the league is worried about playing the Flames, and that is not ok.

Last edited by wired; 03-03-2018 at 11:20 PM.
wired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 12:01 AM   #57
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

That's the biggest thing. Opposing teams seem to have nothing to be worried about when playing Calgary. It really seems that they do nothing overly well.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2018, 02:31 AM   #58
JohnnyB
Franchise Player
 
JohnnyB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Shanghai
Exp:
Default

People pointing out that the Flames had scrubs in 03-04 as a criticism are missing the relevance of that. There were a bunch of players on that team who not only came out of nowhere that year to fill in and play significant roles but also moved on into higher roles with other teams than ever would have been expected previously. That is a sign of a well-managed and well-lead group, which they were with Sutter. A couple of players were good before Sutter showed up, but a lot of guys learned to be NHL players through being on that team. Good players were also pushed to achieve their greatest potential. Good leadership can do that. Flames are really missing that now in the coaching.
__________________

"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"
JohnnyB is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to JohnnyB For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2018, 07:18 AM   #59
BigBCalgary
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Movin' Dirt
Exp:
Default

Coaching/leadership.
__________________
"25 strong"+Thousands in the stands at the 'Dome & millions elswhere
-be counted.
I Believe in the Red!!!
BigBCalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2018, 08:17 AM   #60
calgarygringo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Exp:
Default

I ranted in the other thread we only have a mediocre team on the best nights so people should not complain much other than lately the even what we have doesn't come out for 60 minutes of hockey.
We have a weak bottom 6 as was already suggested, defense is mediocre and we have no snipers at the top that you can put out there to fire pucks into the net.
Until this team shores up the bottom half of the front and defense and finds a couple of real shooters instead of all these cast offs he keeps picking up this team will be nothing better than a maybe playoff team at best.
calgarygringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy