Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2017, 01:22 PM   #41
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slybomb View Post
Did the entry fee that Vegas paid go to HRR?
If so, then it might be possible that the cap retracts back after next season...I don't know how that works but it was a significant fee.
The expansion fee is not HRR as far as I know. I can't seem to find anything definitive on this at the moment, but that's what I recall.

EDIT: Here we go

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsbusinessdaily
Per the league’s collective-bargaining agreement, hockey-related revenue is split with the players before being divided equally among the clubs. The expansion-fee money is not considered hockey-related revenue and will be split solely among the owners. Beyond that, however, league and team officials believe that the Las Vegas franchise will perform comparably to what other teams secure for the dollars that are shared with the players — such as ticketing, media and sponsorship deals. League officials also believe the Las Vegas team will help the league with future national opportunities.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 12-08-2017 at 01:29 PM.
Finger Cookin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:30 PM   #42
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slybomb View Post
Did the entry fee that Vegas paid go to HRR?
If so, then it might be possible that the cap retracts back after next season...I don't know how that works but it was a significant fee.
Expansion fee's are not HHR mainly because you'd see the cap go up by about $8 million bucks based on $500 million, and then the next year it would drop back down by about 8 million dollars.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:34 PM   #43
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
It doesn't even make sense. The Canucks actually have young exciting players now, are fighting for a playoff spot, and the fans don't show up?
Hockey is too expensive. I try to spend as little on it as possible now. I'm not interested in lining the pockets of billionaire greedy owners, and spoiled brat millionaire hockey players. Both of which are glad to put a gun to the City of Calgary and hold the fans hostage for a giant hand out on a new arena they will only further enrich themselves on
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:37 PM   #44
East Coast Flame
Powerplay Quarterback
 
East Coast Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

So max salary could be up to about $16.4 mil?

I think some people on this board might have a stroke when they see what Karlsson and Doughty get paid.
East Coast Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:38 PM   #45
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
It doesn't even make sense. The Canucks actually have young exciting players now, are fighting for a playoff spot, and the fans don't show up?
Why spend hundreds of dollars at the game when you can sit at home and watch it in HD?

I think there will be a market correction soon with ticket prices in Canada.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2017, 01:51 PM   #46
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I'm telling you the future of sports isn't big mega arenas. Its smaller arena's that are fully luxury, where every one that wants to go to a game is paying thousands for a booth or a box. The arena's will be completely wired with the most up to date camera, audio and other technologies. then they'll sell subscriptions to the fans. Why sell 16,000 tickets at an average of $200.00 each, when you can sell 1000 tickets at triple that and then get 100,000 people buy $30.00 per game subscriptions so that they can have all of the advanced stats flashing on the screen in Super duper 16 k video in 3d?

Its a easier sell job and the people that want to go to the game and be treated lavishly will pay the ticket and food prices that are through the roof.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2017, 01:52 PM   #47
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by East Coast Flame View Post
So max salary could be up to about $16.4 mil?

I think some people on this board might have a stroke when they see what Karlsson and Doughty get paid.
I kind of wish McDavid had waited until this off season to sign. The Edmonton media could have predicted $16.4m then suddenly claimed the Saviour was lowering his ask to $15.5 to allow the team to compete.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:53 PM   #48
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by East Coast Flame View Post
So max salary could be up to about $16.4 mil?

I think some people on this board might have a stroke when they see what Karlsson and Doughty get paid.
If that's the case, will McDavid be kicking himself for listening to his agent signing a max year deal?

Last edited by midniteowl; 12-08-2017 at 01:54 PM. Reason: spelling
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:54 PM   #49
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Tired of this 'valuable in the community rhetoric'. If he was gone another player would take his place. Most are required by their contracts to be visible in the community these days so it doesn't deserve accolades.
Doing something good for the community *always* deserves accolades.

"Tired of" it? Really? Is hearing something positive about a person that bothersome to you?
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 01:54 PM   #50
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I'm telling you the future of sports isn't big mega arenas. Its smaller arena's that are fully luxury, where every one that wants to go to a game is paying thousands for a booth or a box. The arena's will be completely wired with the most up to date camera, audio and other technologies. then they'll sell subscriptions to the fans. Why sell 16,000 tickets at an average of $200.00 each, when you can sell 1000 tickets at triple that and then get 100,000 people buy $30.00 per game subscriptions so that they can have all of the advanced stats flashing on the screen in Super duper 16 k video in 3d?

Its a easier sell job and the people that want to go to the game and be treated lavishly will pay the ticket and food prices that are through the roof.
Nobody's going to be paying $30 a game for anything sports related at home. You have the in arena future model likely pretty bang on, but the outside arena future is more likely that sports just aren't that big of a thing anymore, money wise, and teams won't get much revenue there, aka the market correction.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:12 PM   #51
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Surprised that the players don't want to keep it down since that would lower the escrow that they hate so much.

Also, as much as this helps the teams in cap trouble it is a dagger for cap floor teams. Without Bolland's 5M on the books the Yotes wouldn't be compliant as is.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:13 PM   #52
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
Surprised that the players don't want to keep it down since that would lower the escrow that they hate so much.
This is just a projection and is dependent on whether or not the escalator clause is enacted again. That has yet to be decided.
Finger Cookin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:13 PM   #53
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

The good news about a potential cap increase is this gives Chia more money to over-pay Nurse with.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:14 PM   #54
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Those people counting our future cap space shouldn't be budgeting over 80M. I doubt the team is going to lose money just to spend to the cap and they have maxed out their revenues.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:19 PM   #55
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Really don't know if Backlund gets his payday from the Flames. Janko going to need to get paid, Bennetts going to get a raise most likely, then Tkachuk....

We will see where we are at come deadline day but I suspect Janko is going to ease whatever concerns anyone has of where do the find a suitable replacement for Backlund.

I'm so confused with Backs, to me he's a forever Flame but does that match the build cycle of the team.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:25 PM   #56
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
It doesn't even make sense. The Canucks actually have young exciting players now, are fighting for a playoff spot, and the fans don't show up?
Fairweather unknowledgeable fans.
Fan in Exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 02:33 PM   #57
joejoe3
First Line Centre
 
joejoe3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
It doesn't even make sense. The Canucks actually have young exciting players now, are fighting for a playoff spot, and the fans don't show up?
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!
joejoe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 03:16 PM   #58
Flamenspiel
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I'm telling you the future of sports isn't big mega arenas. Its smaller arena's that are fully luxury, where every one that wants to go to a game is paying thousands for a booth or a box. The arena's will be completely wired with the most up to date camera, audio and other technologies. then they'll sell subscriptions to the fans. Why sell 16,000 tickets at an average of $200.00 each, when you can sell 1000 tickets at triple that and then get 100,000 people buy $30.00 per game subscriptions so that they can have all of the advanced stats flashing on the screen in Super duper 16 k video in 3d?

Its a easier sell job and the people that want to go to the game and be treated lavishly will pay the ticket and food prices that are through the roof.
All interesting points, my favourite new arena(not really that new anymore) is the Bell centre. They seem to have the best of both worlds. Great seats at all price points while having all the new luxury box style requirements that modern venues have. I think the Canucks and the Oilers fell short on their design, they basically have a nice lower bowl but very poor facilities and seating in the upper areas. I have been to some of the newer US arenas but they always have so many empty seats its hard to tell if they work well at capacity.

Last edited by Flamenspiel; 12-08-2017 at 03:18 PM.
Flamenspiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2017, 03:54 PM   #59
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Rogers TV contract is structured to pay out more every year of the deal. Part of the reason why you see the salary cap go up every year.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 12-08-2017, 08:19 PM   #60
Flamescuprun2018
Scoring Winger
 
Flamescuprun2018's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Working through the chess moves for the next couple years. Some very strategic cap management by Tre projected. There is very good chance our core can remain intact for many years. One of our top 4 D men likely to be traded but that may not be necessary for another 2 years!

Source: https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/flames

If we take the median of 80 million next year and project from this year's cap hit which is 72.8 million currently.

Forwards are at 39.1 million
Defence are 25.8 million
Goalies 5.0 million
Lack Buried 0.3 million
Current buyouts 1.8 million


Next year:

Forwards 39.1m - 3.1m (Stajan) = 36.0 with increases for Janko and Backlund + one new AHLer, other RFAs likely cost neutral.

Defence 25.8m with increases for Kulak

Goalie 5.0m with increase for Rittich

Lack gone, Buyouts only 0.9m

No overages likely since room on this years cap for all expected bonuses.

67.7 million total.
12.3 million to give Janko, Backlund, Kulak and Rittich raises from current salaries and add one AHL to replace Stajan.

Kulak and Rittich likely to only get 1 million raises. Janko perhaps 2 million raise depending on productivity rest of the way. AHLer is <1 million. Leaving over 7 million in cap space for Backlund increase.

I dont see Flames spending anywhere near the cap even when resigning Backlund unless one year deal only for top 9 RW (3-4 million range tops).

They will need plenty of cap for Tkachuk, Bennett and Ferland raises in 2019-20. Smith comes off books and Brouwer likely bought out of final year will help. Lets hope one of Rittich, Gillies or Parsons is ready for starter role by then.

Dont see any cap need to buyout Brouwer this off-season and have him on the books for another 4 years. Better to hope he can contribute on 4th line and SH for another 1 1/2 seasons despite his inflated salary.
Flamescuprun2018 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy