Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2017, 05:08 PM   #41
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

Tre said the Flames were willing to offer an AHL deal, but Falkovsky wanted to try for an NHL ELC - and was able to get one.
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 05:22 PM   #42
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

So if the flames didn't qualify him he would have been put back into this last nhl draft right. If that is the case he went undrafted and LA signed him as an undrafted FA. Is that more or less the case?
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 05:33 PM   #43
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
So if the flames didn't qualify him he would have been put back into this last nhl draft right. If that is the case he went undrafted and LA signed him as an undrafted FA. Is that more or less the case?
I believe because of his age he was not eligible to be in the 2017 draft.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2017, 07:14 PM   #44
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Too bad. I thought Falkovsky was a really solid prospect with his size, skating and offensive acumen. Count me in as another curious fan as to why the Flames didn't keep him.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 08:13 PM   #45
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Did he run over Treliving's dog? I don't see how they would literally give up on a prospect/asset -- it's not like he played poorly in Adirondack last year.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 09:32 PM   #46
sempuki
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Not now agreed. But liked his trajectory so far. I think we are missing part of the story. Not typical BT asset management.

35 contracts out of 50 as of today. Looks like we still had some spots once our remaining AHL and NHL contracts signed.
Given the way it leaked to Belarusian media first, I suspect Falkovsky was not happy with the way he was being treated, and wasn't interested in coming back. Tre probably wanted to cook him longer, and he felt he could do better.
sempuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:20 PM   #47
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default Kings sign former Flames draft pick Stepan Falkovsky

Guy crushes it in goofy echl. But is cockblocked by Aulie and Kenny Morrison in Stockton who are valueless. I would be ticked too. Kind of looks like flames mismanaged him. The scout responsible can't be happy either.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:29 PM   #48
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Remember that he was drafted in his second year of eligibility, so it's like he's a 2015 draft pick.

This really isn't any different from the Flames choosing to not sign John Gilmour last year or Eric Roy a couple of years ago. They both also had strong seasons after they were drafted, but Treliving decided not to give them contracts.

Other GMs would likely have given all three of them contracts because they wouldn't want to "waste" a draft pick.

If they don't see an NHL future for him, it's better to give him a chance to find a team that will offer him a future.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:29 PM   #49
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm slightly upset with this. What the hell happened between the flames and Falkovsky? I mean I suppose the party line is supposed to be " Meh. Late round pick they rarely work out" but he showed so.e serious upside even if it was the ECHL. I want to k of what happened. Because this has a solid chance to come back and bite the Flames in the butt
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:46 PM   #50
sempuki
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
Guy crushes it in goofy echl. But is cockblocked by Aulie and Kenny Morrison in Stockton who are valueless. I would be ticked too. Kind of looks like flames mismanaged him. The scout responsible can't be happy either.
People keep saying this, but it's never true: if he out plays those two, he gets the job. Development takes time, and rushing it doesn't necessarily improve your career.

Kenny Morrison is also *gone*.
sempuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 06:36 AM   #51
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

I think a part of it is also planning ahead and keeping a contract spot available for one of the young dmen we have who are probably ahead developmently (i.e. Fox, Valimaki) or suddenly break through. It seems that the last few years they have signed a bunch of their late rounders (Phillips, Mangiapane, AOM).

He did have a unique skillset, but it looks like the Flames have walked away from all their behemoth projects. Maybe they think the stable is getting pretty full and want to keep a spot open to help a forward develop since that does seem to be an area that requires a bit of work.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 06:57 AM   #52
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I'm slightly upset with this. What the hell happened between the flames and Falkovsky? I mean I suppose the party line is supposed to be " Meh. Late round pick they rarely work out" but he showed so.e serious upside even if it was the ECHL. I want to k of what happened. Because this has a solid chance to come back and bite the Flames in the butt
Define solid chance given this guy is an uber long shot to make the NHL. Personally I don't mind that BT is raising the bar when it comes to what prospects get new contracts.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 07:29 AM   #53
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

This one is a little confusing. The player only showed improvement as a prospect, which is what you hope for. They Flames cleared a whack of space in the minors, so a spot was there. The Flames aren't in contract trouble, so that issue isn't there. Plus the Flames are going to be short prospects in the upcoming drafts. There must be something more to this than meets the eye.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 08:55 AM   #54
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM View Post
Define solid chance given this guy is an uber long shot to make the NHL. Personally I don't mind that BT is raising the bar when it comes to what prospects get new contracts.


He's a long shot. No doubt. But What bar? The bar set by Kenny Morrison? The fact another team sees something in a guy we gave only a year of development (who crushed the challenge he was given in the ECHL) kind of smells funny. The guy has value.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 08:59 AM   #55
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Morrison was cut loose as soon as he could be. He was under contract. He is an example that also illustrates the higher bar...not refutes it
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 09:05 AM   #56
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Just because a team signed him doesn't mean he had trade value. Folks overreact to these guys being cut loose (Agostino, Ramage, Gilmour etc) but really they are rather meaningless decisions
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 09:15 AM   #57
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

The Tre regime has cut loose a lot of prospects the last few years, and so far we haven't been burned. Have to give them the benefit of the doubt until they drop the ball.

This one does seem odd though, given that they turned him pro right away and despite him doing seemingly well at that level, they didn't view him worthy of an ELC. Almost like there were other reasons for the decision than just talent or ability.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 09:25 AM   #58
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
This one is a little confusing. The player only showed improvement as a prospect, which is what you hope for. They Flames cleared a whack of space in the minors, so a spot was there. The Flames aren't in contract trouble, so that issue isn't there. Plus the Flames are going to be short prospects in the upcoming drafts. There must be something more to this than meets the eye.
Exactly.

As you pointed out, there are basically 3 relevant points:

1) he progressed this year (all you want from a prospect)
2) the Flames are no where near being under pressure with the number of contracts
3) they are far from over-crowded with prospects

So this isn't an organization decision, this is a player decision.

Pure speculation (and I hate doing that), but for some reason I get an uncoachable / selfish vibe. But even if that were true, there is still plenty of time to right the ship.
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 07-02-2017, 09:46 AM   #59
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Kings traded a lot of picks/prospects for their cups. They don't have much in the pipeline. They are looking for these players, they also signed away a goalie, Cal Peterson, from Buffalo after he finished his NCAA career.

Will be awhile before we see the result of this. For now I'm happy with the D at NHL level and Valimaki, Fox, Andersson, Kylington, Healey, Ollas-Mattsson in the pipeline.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2017, 10:09 AM   #60
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

He is a marginal prospect. People need to move on.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Husky For This Useful Post:
bax
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy