09-19-2016, 08:18 AM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I hate to see the Oilers get better but I simply don't want Russell in a Flames jersey again. I'm over the pair of Russell and Wideman and feel the team needs to move on to more dependable defensemen in their own end. Hartley's fire wagon hockey was nice for a season but it's clear that you can't win consistently with defensemen that are better in the neutral zone and offensive zone than their own end of the ice. Oilers can have him and his shot blocking stats.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:23 AM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Not surprised as I would think the Alberta teams top his destination wish list and since he is not cashing in the big deal he might as well play close to home
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:45 AM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
|
AN upgrade over guys like Nikitin, Ference, Reinhart. He can be a decent stop-gap 2nd pairing guy for them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:46 AM
|
#44
|
Franchise Player
|
I get the possession stats putting many against him but he is still better than anyone in our bottom 3. I'd take him over smid wideman or engelland. Although engelland might be needed if tkachuk runs around half as much as he has been at the youngstars
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:53 AM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
If anything, Russell would at least be good for the Oilers locker room. The guy works hard and can lead by example. Ference was similar, but was already well over the curve.
Last edited by 1qqaaz; 09-19-2016 at 09:03 AM.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:57 AM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Because Russell isn't good. Ergo if the Oilers fill a spot with someone who isn't good they then won't fill it with someone who is.
|
The boogie man argument. He's better than most of what they have now. But he's apparently not better than another player they might bring in instead..............sure. Except, that "other player" doesn't exist and isn't an option. The only way this move stops them from getting better is if they hoop themselves on term. If they do that, Flames fans should be happy, if they don't, not like we should quiver in our boots, but why be happy that a rival improved?
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:59 AM
|
#47
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias
AN upgrade over guys like Nikitin, Ference, Reinhart. He can be a decent stop-gap 2nd pairing guy for them.
|
None of who will be in the oilers lineup on opening day
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 08:59 AM
|
#48
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Can he play the right side? Or is he strictly a left side dman
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:00 AM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
Can he play the right side? Or is he strictly a left side dman
|
Side of the ice is irrelevant whilst on your stomach
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#50
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Yeah I'm not a huge fan of his tbh.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:01 AM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robaur
Russell isnt very good. Was always overhyped by the media here....Kerr, Steinberg etc...but when he went to Dallas...it was pretty obvious.
Same thing happened with Glencross....the local media is more focused on maintaining a good relationship with players on the roster and forget to actually present their thoughts without massive bias.
Most opinions on players in Calgary are tainted by the bias of media such as Steinberg, Wills, Kerr, Millions etc....and its does a massive disservice to this hockey market. I think its just because the Flames ownership are very involved in Fan 960 operations or its just a small town?? Anyone care to elaborate?
|
Steinberg was quite outspoken against Russell as a player. Didn't him and Loubardias have an argument on air over this stuff?
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:03 AM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
Yeah I'm not a huge fan of his tbh.
|
Short term, especially if it's a one year, I doubt there's not much not to like from an Oilers perspective, he'll make your backend better and he's a great character player too.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:06 AM
|
#53
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Mckenzie says he's looking for 4-5mil on a one year deal. Seems a little steep, no?
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:08 AM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
None of who will be in the oilers lineup on opening day
|
I know. I'm just finding it difficult to compliment Russell, but he is definitely better than those guys, at least.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:09 AM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
Mckenzie says he's looking for 4-5mil on a one year deal. Seems a little steep, no?
|
Yes, I would say so. That said, other than money out of the owners pockets, what the actual opportunity cost of paying him that much?
Not much left on the open market that the Oilers would be passing up on or missing out signing instead, so that's not really a risk. I guess the only risk is if a trade pops up during the season that the Oilers would like to make, and all of a sudden the cap space used up on Russell prevents that move. I'd say that's pretty unlikely. As long as it's not more than one year on that dollar amount, I don't think there's much risk to it for the Oilers, although I will admit I'd be surprised if he can still command that dollar, even on a 1 year at this point in the offseason.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:14 AM
|
#56
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
Well we have cap space, but really not that much tbh. We have to account for Bonuses for a couple of our guys, and Ferences LTIR doesn't help for that. Not saying it's a for sure issue but it's suck to have an overage penalty for 1 year of Kris Russell
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:16 AM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
Well we have cap space, but really not that much tbh. We have to account for Bonuses for a couple of our guys, and Ferences LTIR doesn't help for that. Not saying it's a for sure issue but it's suck to have an overage penalty for 1 year of Kris Russell
|
That's fair, but again, if that were the case the overages are only a concern the following year if they prevent any moves from being made that the team would really like to make. I'm sure the risk as you point out isn't 0, but I'm guessing potentially overpaying Russell for a year has a pretty low risk of coming back and biting the Oilers in the butt, versus the improvement he'll represent on the backend and in team culture.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:16 AM
|
#58
|
CP's Fraser Crane
|
I honestly like Nakladal better...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stang For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#59
|
In the Sin Bin
|
He's not a good defensemen so they can have him.
|
|
|
09-19-2016, 09:26 AM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
I think he is being undervalued here. He would be a great get for the oilers. He was heavily involved as part of the leadership team that helped build the culture here. He may not be an advanced stat darling but he is a hell of a hockey player and hell of a person. He undoubtedly makes the Oilers better on the back end because he can get the puck out of the Def zone and up to the forwards.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 PM.
|
|