View Poll Results: Your order?
|
Monahan Bennett Tkachuk
|
  
|
65 |
20.12% |
Monahan Tkachuk Bennett
|
  
|
21 |
6.50% |
Bennett Monahan Tkachuk
|
  
|
136 |
42.11% |
Bennett Tkachuk Monahan
|
  
|
86 |
26.63% |
Tkachuk Monahan Bennett
|
  
|
10 |
3.10% |
Tkachuk Bennett Monahan
|
  
|
5 |
1.55% |
08-03-2016, 02:39 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy
Looking back on it though, the 2013 draft was way better at the top end than 2014 or 2016 (Matthews excepted).
Monahan's draft year compares nicely with a player like Dubois, who should have gone no worse than 4th this year. It's not often that you see a player that has double the points of the next player on his team. His low draft ranking was also due to people thinking that his draft year was no better than his draft-1, (78 points both years), but they probably failed to realize his team went from playoffs to basement, with Monahan being one of the only good players left.
I can't imagine any scout (except Edmonton ones of course, they did take Hall over Seguin) taking Tkachuk over Monahan at their drafts.
|
Drouin says HI
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:40 PM
|
#42
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jun 2016
Exp: 
|
1. Johnny " The Magician Gaudreau"
2. Johnny " Mr Overtime" Gaudreau
3. Johnny " Who's Merlin I'm the Wizard" Gaudreau
4. Sam " You Shall not pass" Bennett
6. Matthew " Don't call me upchuck" Tkachuk
7. Sean " I like hockey it's nice" Monahan
Last edited by dabrit; 08-03-2016 at 02:44 PM.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:42 PM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabrit
1. Johnny " The Magician Gaudreau"
2. Johnny " Mr Overtime" Gaudreau
3. Johnny " Who's Merlin I'm the Wizard" Gaudreau
4. Sam " You Shall not pass" Bennett
6. Michael " Don't call me upchuck" Tkachuk
7. Sean " I like hockey it's nice" Monahan
|
Who is Michael Tkachuk?
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:44 PM
|
#44
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jun 2016
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
Who is Michael Tkachuk?
|
Oops....I'm drunk I get a pass.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dabrit For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:46 PM
|
#45
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
Who is Michael Tkachuk?
|
Best friends with jarmoe Iginla
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:56 PM
|
#46
|
Self-Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
This is an exaggerated concern.
|
This is dismissive with no logic to support an argument.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 02:56 PM
|
#47
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jun 2016
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
Best friends with jarmoe Iginla
|
I remember when Steve Armitage introduced Jarome as " Joe Iginla" lol.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:05 PM
|
#48
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold
This is dismissive with no logic to support an argument.
|
"No logic"? I don't think that is terribly meaningful, but as far as support I would say that since there does not appear to be a direct correlation between a NHL player's size and his propensity for injury the concern is indeed exaggerated.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:06 PM
|
#49
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabrit
I remember when Steve Armitage introduced Jarome as " Joe Iginla" lol.
|
Joe Iginla was traded for the famous Jarome Nieuwendyk.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:17 PM
|
#50
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Bennett, Tkachuk, Monahan
I put Tkachuk ahead of Monahan just because he had ridiculous post season numbers. Not too many players Tkachuk's size have put those kinds of numbers in the last decade.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Lots of shiny new toy syndrome.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:37 PM
|
#52
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
Lots of shiny new toy syndrome.
|
How do you figure?
The question posed by nature requires everyone to evaluate all three players at the time of their respective drafts, when each of them was a "shiny new toy."
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 03:55 PM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
How do you figure?
The question posed by nature requires everyone to evaluate all three players at the time of their respective drafts, when each of them was a "shiny new toy."
|
Ah I misread the post. I thought it meant if they were in the same draft, how would you order them (basically who do you value most).
I would say Bennett, Tkachuk, Monahan for the OP then. I voted MBT.
__________________
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 04:29 PM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold
This is dismissive with no logic to support an argument.
|
Bennett played 77 games this year. At this point, all we know is he can play 94% of an NHL schedule.
EDIT: For reference, Sean Monahan played 2 fewer games his rookie season.
Last edited by GreenLantern2814; 08-03-2016 at 04:35 PM.
|
|
|
08-04-2016, 03:11 AM
|
#55
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
In the 2013 draft I put Bennett in competition for #2 overall, in competition with Jones and Barkov. I wasn't a huge fan of Drouin as a winger.
Tkachuk would, in my opinion, be in competition with Nichushkin. I loved Nichushkin. Still do, despite his injuries and struggles. Tkachuk would have won, despite his height, mostly due to the "Russian factor"
|
|
|
08-04-2016, 05:02 AM
|
#56
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
Bennett
Tkachuk
Monahan
Based purely on rankings and hype. Money is a beauty, but he didn't have near the hype leading up to the draft as the other two.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-04-2016, 06:23 AM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Bennett Monahan Tkachuk leading but I'd like to be pleasantly surprised.
Don't know how it plays out with Chucker but it would be cool to see him be a force and make thr Flames keep him up.
Bennett has already impressed the snot out of me
Sean is good but how can you not be a little bit better playing beside an all world talent superstar like Johnny.
This year will be interesting to see if those 2 stick together on a line with new coaches.
|
|
|
08-04-2016, 07:36 AM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
What's curious is that Bennett, Monahan, Tkachuk is winning this despite short memories as the poll going into the 2013 draft had more posters picking Lindholm than Monahan in the poll for the Flames pick. There was a lot of talk of Tkachuk being possibly the 3rd overall prospect going into the draft while Monahan was never in top 5 talk for his draft. Maybe some voters don't understand that the vote is based on where they were in their draft years and not how good they are today or will be?
|
|
|
08-04-2016, 07:56 AM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Voted Bennett, Monahan, Tkachuk but it was tough. Bennett was a player some had going number 1 in the draft but we had a top 4 pick in a draft where the first ledge was after 4. I thought we were getting Bennett, Drasaitl, or Reinhart (no way Ekblad slipped past the Oil). 2013 was a much deeper draft. As Flames fans we knew we were getting one of Monahan or Lindholm we just didn't get to pick. Similar to 2014 the Flames get the guy they wanted fall into their laps and he hasn't disappointed yet. 2016 we couldn't really talk about Tkachuk falling to 6 after the Mem Cup. It seemed more likely he would break that top 3 before falling down to 6. To me the Tkachuk pick was the most surprising as I didn't think it would happen without trading up with the Oilers or Canucks.
i just look at how fortunate the Flames have been drafting in the top 10 since trading Iginla. We had the perfect player fall in our laps when it came out time to pick. Basically drafting our top 2 centre's and our next power forward winger. Having drafted a superstar winger and top pairing Dman in the 4th round years earlier sure helped and fleecing the Bruins for their young stud D also accelerated things.
I look at the players picked one spot before and one spot after our top 10 picks.
Lindholm
Drasaitl
Juolevi
Or
Nurse
Dal Cole
Keller
Looking at those picks I couldn't help but think the flames would be a couple years behind on the rebuild if we had those trios over our own
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-04-2016, 08:09 AM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Voted Bennett, Monahan, Tkachuk but it was tough. Bennett was a player some had going number 1 in the draft but we had a top 4 pick in a draft where the first ledge was after 4. I thought we were getting Bennett, Drasaitl, or Reinhart (no way Ekblad slipped past the Oil). 2013 was a much deeper draft. As Flames fans we knew we were getting one of Monahan or Lindholm we just didn't get to pick. Similar to 2014 the Flames get the guy they wanted fall into their laps and he hasn't disappointed yet. 2016 we couldn't really talk about Tkachuk falling to 6 after the Mem Cup. It seemed more likely he would break that top 3 before falling down to 6. To me the Tkachuk pick was the most surprising as I didn't think it would happen without trading up with the Oilers or Canucks.
i just look at how fortunate the Flames have been drafting in the top 10 since trading Iginla. We had the perfect player fall in our laps when it came out time to pick. Basically drafting our top 2 centre's and our next power forward winger. Having drafted a superstar winger and top pairing Dman in the 4th round years earlier sure helped and fleecing the Bruins for their young stud D also accelerated things.
I look at the players picked one spot before and one spot after our top 10 picks.
Lindholm
Drasaitl
Juolevi
Or
Nurse
Dal Cole
Keller
Looking at those picks I couldn't help but think the flames would be a couple years behind on the rebuild if we had those trios over our own
|
Good post and some solid points. The Flames have been VERY fortunate with how some of the picks have fallen onto the teams' lap and the fact that we've hit absolute diamonds in the rough in the 4th round. I don't even want to imagine where this team would be without Gaudreau or Brodie. All the talk of the team taking 'the next step' would certainly be shut down without those 2.
Out of that entire list, Draisatl is really the only player I would consider even being in the conversation of swapping with our picks, but even then I hesitate. The team IMO would be quite a bit behind the rebuild if we had say Lindholm instead of Monahan.
While it's obviously too early to really make any concrete statements about who the best players are, I think the Flames have really acquired the best possible talent possible. And that's a real tip of the hat to not only the scouting staff and management, but to the hockey gods who finally seem to slowly be swaying in our favour.
Last edited by Huntingwhale; 08-04-2016 at 08:12 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.
|
|