Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-05-2016, 11:32 PM   #41
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
If Tree somehow drafts four players with the sixth pick I will give major props.
Will be interesting to see what Chevnasty does with his picks.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 12:00 AM   #42
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

I think the most likely scenarios are:

Scenario 1: Oilers pick Tkachuk, Canucks pick Dubois.

Scenario 2: Oilers pick Dubois, Canucks pick Tkachuk.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 12:12 AM   #43
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Only 18 more days.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 01:26 AM   #44
Krynn
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
My guess is Tkachuk, Dubois, Juolevi and Brown.
My guess 2 I would love it if we land brown .I just have good feelings about him.
Krynn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 02:05 AM   #45
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
I think the most likely scenarios are:

Scenario 1: Oilers pick Tkachuk, Canucks pick Dubois.

Scenario 2: Oilers pick Dubois, Canucks pick Tkachuk.
I think scenario 2 is interesting to explore. So say EDM takes Dubois. Can VAN really afford to take yet another winger? They drafted Boeser last year, Virtanen the year before. Traded for Baertschi. Will they build around wingers? I've heard Benning talk about building through defense and centre. I'm sure they love Tkachuk but they really need to find those cornerstone centres and dmen. I mean it wouldn't shock me if they took Tkachuk but I don't think it's a slam dunk. I think Benning really likes good skaters and Tkachuk is decent but not amazing.

If whoever picks fourth takes Dubois then I think any of the following could happen with Vancouver
-they take Tkachuk
-they take Brown
-they take Sergachev
-they take Juolevi
-they take Chychrun
-they trade down 1-3 spots and take one of the above
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 04:55 AM   #46
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Every team talks about bpa, and you bias to centers and/or defence in case of a tie.

At their picks, I don't think the oilers or nucks view it as a tie. At least I don't
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 05:18 AM   #47
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Won't we all be surprised when the Flames pick Sergachev.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 05:03 PM   #48
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default



Benning says they're focused on 6, 7, 8 players for their pick lol.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 05:07 PM   #49
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Yeah I didn't get that he excluded 4 and 5 at the very least. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt in that they have a guy at 5 but they also wanted to talk to the guys at 6,7,8 that they like. How did he ever get hired for a GM position as I can't imagine he's a compelling interview?
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 05:09 PM   #50
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

'Process' is just Treliving's 'To Be Quite Honest.'

Time to revive the drinking game.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 05:42 PM   #51
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Yeah I didn't get that he excluded 4 and 5 at the very least. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt in that they have a guy at 5 but they also wanted to talk to the guys at 6,7,8 that they like. How did he ever get hired for a GM position as I can't imagine he's a compelling interview?
The interview is only one part of the process

Just kidding. Burke said, paraphrasing, that he didn't really interview him. He had been working with and monitoring his progress for years and knew he was his guy.

So in essence a compelling interview was not really part of the process after all

Last edited by DeluxeMoustache; 06-06-2016 at 05:44 PM.
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:26 PM   #52
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

I just don't see the need for the Flames to draft a Dman with such a high pick. With Gio here for probably 5 years, Brodie for longer and guys like Rasmussen, Kylington, Sieloff, Morrison, Wotherspoon, Kanzig, Culkin and Kulak in the system, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Speaking of not making a lot of sense, Edmonton and Vancouver who ACTUALLY need a puck moving franchise defenceman will probably pick a foward not realizing the only way they will get a franchise dman is by drafting one. That being said, I hope either one of Edmonton or Van get smart for once and pick what they need so we can get something we need.

PS- I still think there is a deal to be had with Columbus. They need to draft a number 1 centerman to replace Johanson and they will not get one via trade. The Flames need a top line RW prospect (Jesse P). I bet Logan Brown is high on Columbus' list of top needs. The Flames will easily have the option to draft Brown, but, we don't need a top centerman- we got Money, Backlund and Bennett.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:29 PM   #53
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
PS- I still think there is a deal to be had with Columbus. They need to draft a number 1 centerman to replace Johanson and they will not get one via trade. The Flames need a top line RW prospect (Jesse P). I bet Logan Brown is high on Columbus' list of top needs. The Flames will easily have the option to draft Brown, but, we don't need a top centerman- we got Money, Backlund and Bennett.
The problem with this line of thinking is there's a good chance Vancouver likes Brown as well and as such a Columbus-Calgary swap doesn't guarantee them the player they want at all.
GoJetsGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:35 PM   #54
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
The problem with this line of thinking is there's a good chance Vancouver likes Brown as well and as such a Columbus-Calgary swap doesn't guarantee them the player they want at all.
I have a hard time believing that Van would pass on either Dubois or Tkachuk in favor of Brown, but, you never know. That's just what my gut tells me.
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cowtown75 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 06:39 PM   #55
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
I have a hard time believing that Van would pass on either Dubois or Tkachuk in favor of Brown, but, you never know. That's just what my gut tells me.
But if you're Columbus and running a professional sports team and you have your heart set on Logan Brown, do you deal away a commodity like the #3 pick on a gut feeling Vancouver won't take the guy you want?

Doesn't make any sense. There is a fairly decent chance Brown is on Vancouver's radar, and that alone makes a pick swap between Calgary and Columbus very problematic if their reason for doing it is because of Brown.
GoJetsGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:43 PM   #56
Erratik
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
But if you're Columbus and running a professional sports team and you have your heart set on Logan Brown, do you deal away a commodity like the #3 pick on a gut feeling Vancouver won't take the guy you want?

Doesn't make any sense. There is a fairly decent chance Brown is on Vancouver's radar, and that alone makes a pick swap between Calgary and Columbus very problematic if their reason for doing it is because of Brown.
Or you just put the framework of the deal in place and wait for Vancouver to pick before you finalize?
Erratik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 06:48 PM   #57
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowtown75 View Post
I just don't see the need for the Flames to draft a Dman with such a high pick. With Gio here for probably 5 years, Brodie for longer and guys like Rasmussen, Kylington, Sieloff, Morrison, Wotherspoon, Kanzig, Culkin and Kulak in the system, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Speaking of not making a lot of sense, Edmonton and Vancouver who ACTUALLY need a puck moving franchise defenceman will probably pick a foward not realizing the only way they will get a franchise dman is by drafting one. That being said, I hope either one of Edmonton or Van get smart for once and pick what they need so we can get something we need.

PS- I still think there is a deal to be had with Columbus. They need to draft a number 1 centerman to replace Johanson and they will not get one via trade. The Flames need a top line RW prospect (Jesse P). I bet Logan Brown is high on Columbus' list of top needs. The Flames will easily have the option to draft Brown, but, we don't need a top centerman- we got Money, Backlund and Bennett.
I agree, Rasmussen is our future.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 06:49 PM   #58
To Be Quite Honest
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
'Process' is just Treliving's 'To Be Quite Honest.'

Time to revive the drinking game.
Perhaps I should ask if I can change my name to The Process.
To Be Quite Honest is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to To Be Quite Honest For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2016, 07:00 PM   #59
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erratik View Post
Or you just put the framework of the deal in place and wait for Vancouver to pick before you finalize?
So Columbus drafts Puljujarvi at 3, has him put the Jersey on, shake hands and do interviews and flips him 10 mins later?

Suppose it's possible but that seems equally unlikely.
GoJetsGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2016, 08:00 PM   #60
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
I think scenario 2 is interesting to explore. So say EDM takes Dubois. Can VAN really afford to take yet another winger? They drafted Boeser last year, Virtanen the year before. Traded for Baertschi. Will they build around wingers? I've heard Benning talk about building through defense and centre. I'm sure they love Tkachuk but they really need to find those cornerstone centres and dmen. I mean it wouldn't shock me if they took Tkachuk but I don't think it's a slam dunk. I think Benning really likes good skaters and Tkachuk is decent but not amazing.

If whoever picks fourth takes Dubois then I think any of the following could happen with Vancouver
-they take Tkachuk
-they take Brown
-they take Sergachev
-they take Juolevi
-they take Chychrun
-they trade down 1-3 spots and take one of the above
If Benning really wants a center and would prefer to move down from a top 5 pick to get one, I think he'll trade the pick and that team will just grab Tkachuk. Same goes for defencemen and he'll get an idea from the teams in the 6-10 range who they are eyeing.

Definitely don't see them "reaching" (yes, we don't know their list) and keeping the pick only to pick someone other than Tkachuk.

To me, Tkachuk will be better than both Baertschi and Virtanen so I'd pick him and figure out what to do with those guys instead.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
14
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy