05-21-2016, 01:48 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
|
It wouldn't surprise me if the Flames offer 1 year deals to one of:
Stewart
Tootoo
Talbot
Bernier
Prust
I think we'll be in the discussions with Polak, Okposo and Reimer.
I think we sign Lucic.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
05-21-2016, 09:58 PM
|
#42
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
It wouldn't surprise me if the Flames offer 1 year deals to one of:
Stewart
Tootoo
Talbot
Bernier
Prust
I think we'll be in the discussions with Polak, Okposo and Reimer.
I think we sign Lucic.
|
Why would we go after Polak? I feel we have enough depth on D. Also, I seriously doubt Lucic is signing with us.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-21-2016, 10:57 PM
|
#44
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
Sign Okposo to multi year deal. I think the goalie will come via trade and not UFA.
__________________
|
|
|
05-21-2016, 10:57 PM
|
#45
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Baffled by the continued intrigue by a handful of people on this board as it pertains to Chris Stewart.
He's bounced from team to team because he's a lost cause. I get that he's a big frame and if he could put it together he'd be a force but it's never going to happen. He's an inconstant floater and it's why he hasn't stuck anywhere.
He put up 8 goals and 12 assists in Anaheim this season.
It's not 2010 any more. The guy is lazy and a lost cause. Hoping one of these years his name stops popping up in the what if column.
We have an array of young guys on the farm who would be much better served with an opportunity at that spot vs. gifting it to Stewart for a pipe dream.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to GoJetsGo For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-21-2016, 11:31 PM
|
#46
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Any chatter of someone potentially taking out a flyer on Trudeau for an enforcer-type role?
__________________
Is your cat doing singing?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Max Cow Disease For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-22-2016, 07:40 AM
|
#47
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cow Disease
Any chatter of someone potentially taking out a flyer on Trudeau for an enforcer-type role?
|
Nah, every time he elbows someone he gets caught.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick M. For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-22-2016, 10:16 AM
|
#48
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames should go after Troy Browuer. He is big and plays RW. He also has playoff experience , something the flames don't have a lot of on their squad. Wonder if he would sign a 2 year deal? Been pretty good this playoffs , so 2 years might not get it done.
|
|
|
05-22-2016, 11:02 AM
|
#49
|
Self-Retired
|
Me thinks there is going to be a few teams bidding for Brouwer's services this off season.
The guy has been one of the main if not the main driving force for STL's offence this entire playoffs.
|
|
|
05-22-2016, 11:26 AM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
Baffled by the continued intrigue by a handful of people on this board as it pertains to Chris Stewart.
He's bounced from team to team because he's a lost cause. I get that he's a big frame and if he could put it together he'd be a force but it's never going to happen. He's an inconstant floater and it's why he hasn't stuck anywhere.
He put up 8 goals and 12 assists in Anaheim this season.
It's not 2010 any more. The guy is lazy and a lost cause. Hoping one of these years his name stops popping up in the what if column.
We have an array of young guys on the farm who would be much better served with an opportunity at that spot vs. gifting it to Stewart for a pipe dream.
|
See, the problem here is although what's written is (at least by me anyways):
"I wouldn't mind having Stewart as a depth guy, 10-12 minutes a game, 10g/20p, big body, right shot, mean, $1-1.5 million"
For some reason you read it as:
"Bring him in as the top line RW, force feed him 18+ minutes per night with Johnny/Mony and expect 20-30 goals from him in a total resurgence of his career"
If you bring him in on a 1 year $1.0 million deal, and he gets beaten out of a roster spot by any number of Flames prospects we will have lost nothing. That's pretty much worst case scenario.
But anyways, like I said, many balk hard at any sort of retread, which is fine and expected.
|
|
|
05-22-2016, 11:33 AM
|
#51
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Eric Staal - Montreal
Steven Stamkos - Toronto
Brian Campbell - Edmonton
Milan Lucic - Los Angeles
Patrik Elias - Retires
Keith Yandle - New Jersey
Radim Vrbata - Detroit
James Reimer - Calgary
Nikita Nikitin - KHL
Teddy Purcell - Florida
Dan Hamhuis - Dallas
Loui Eriksson - Vancouver
David Jones - retires
Jiri Hudler - Toronto
Kyle Okposo - Phoenix
Frans Nielsen - NYI
Kris Russell - Vancouver
|
|
|
05-22-2016, 11:52 AM
|
#52
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
See, the problem here is although what's written is (at least by me anyways):
"I wouldn't mind having Stewart as a depth guy, 10-12 minutes a game, 10g/20p, big body, right shot, mean, $1-1.5 million"
For some reason you read it as:
"Bring him in as the top line RW, force feed him 18+ minutes per night with Johnny/Mony and expect 20-30 goals from him in a total resurgence of his career"
If you bring him in on a 1 year $1.0 million deal, and he gets beaten out of a roster spot by any number of Flames prospects we will have lost nothing. That's pretty much worst case scenario.
But anyways, like I said, many balk hard at any sort of retread, which is fine and expected.
|
Nope, I read it as wasting a roster spot / contract on someone we know is lazy and inconsistent.
We already have guys like Raymond and Bolig who are stuck on the books that can and likely will be beat out for roster spots, we don't need to add another player who's going to do nothing but be superfluous. It's just completely unnecessary when we all know what Stewart is at this point in his career. It would be a waste of a contract.
|
|
|
05-22-2016, 11:57 AM
|
#53
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Flames should go after Troy Browuer. He is big and plays RW. He also has playoff experience , something the flames don't have a lot of on their squad. Wonder if he would sign a 2 year deal? Been pretty good this playoffs , so 2 years might not get it done.
|
He put up (practically) 40pts playing 2nd and 3rd line minutes. I could see him hitting 50 on our top line while providing a RHS, size, nastiness, and protection.
I'd do a 4x4 deal if we're able to move out a bad contract.
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 10:26 AM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Satiar Shah
@SatiarShah
.@botchford says the Canucks may prefer Russell over Hamhuis. Scary thought. Much rather extend Hamhuis than chase Russell.
Good for Russell, already getting some attention in the upcoming free agency. I wonder what kind of money he'll be looking for.
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 11:52 AM
|
#55
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
Satiar Shah
@SatiarShah
.@botchford says the Canucks may prefer Russell over Hamhuis. Scary thought. Much rather extend Hamhuis than chase Russell.
Good for Russell, already getting some attention in the upcoming free agency. I wonder what kind of money he'll be looking for.
|
Like many of us in real life, salary and location will be the two driving factors. As much as we dislike the Canucks, Vancouver is a pretty good city to live in - outside of the crazy real estate market. $4.25 to $5.5 million per season for 4 or 5 seasons is my guess. 5 years $25 million. At age 29, he's in his prime for defensemen.
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 11:59 AM
|
#56
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
It's going to awesome when the Canucks give Russell 5m+ for 5+ years
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-24-2016, 12:07 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC 46m46 minutes ago
There is word of a snag in Vadim Shipachyov's status. He may have to fulfill another year in Russia before coming to the NHL.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC 46m46 minutes ago
Apparently, this came up yesterday and involves an option in his KHL contract
The Canadiens were the frontrunner, and an announcement could have been made today. But it looks like they might have to wait.
Shipachev/Shipachyov had 60 points in 54 games (KHL) this year. Maybe the Flames still have a bit of a chance with this guy. Although he's not exactly what we're looking for.
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 12:10 PM
|
#58
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Isn't this guy like 30 years old? Is he an extremely late bloomer or did he just not want to come over because he's good enough to be a top line guy in the KHL but would be a depth player in the NHL? I refuse to believe scouts all over the league would miss a guy for 10 years.
|
|
|
05-24-2016, 04:32 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix
Isn't this guy like 30 years old? Is he an extremely late bloomer or did he just not want to come over because he's good enough to be a top line guy in the KHL but would be a depth player in the NHL? I refuse to believe scouts all over the league would miss a guy for 10 years.
|
Just his last 2 seasons were very impressive. I'm not sure if he is an extremely late bloomer or not.
The NHL interest does seem a little late though. There should have at least been some last year. I do think this is a skilled player that is more useful in a top 6 role. So if he can't make someone's top 6, there's no reason to have him in the NHL.
|
|
|
05-25-2016, 02:17 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I didn't want to start a new thread about this so I put it in here. I'm sitting here looking at the (currently) available UFA's and instead of predicting where they'll go I'm making a wish list.
Who are your top 5 UFA's you'd like to see the Flames sign?
1. Lucic LW
2. Perron RW
3. Okposo RW
4. Backes C/RW
5. Reimer G
I'd prefer one of Lucic OR Okposo but I think Perron would be a good fit on the team. It was a toss up between Backes and McGinn but I think Backes offers more.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.
|
|