| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 10:57 AM | #41 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			nm
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 11:19 AM | #42 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			Anyone think it's kind of BS that the media can release information about the police administering a Breathalyzer test without actually knowing the results of that test?
 This guy will be forever labelled as a drunk driver now regardless of if he was actually impaired or not. Everyone in my office was talking about how he's an ####### drunk but no one actually knew the results of the test.
 
 Seem reckless.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 11:25 AM | #43 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by polak  Anyone think it's kind of BS that the media can release information about the police administering a Breathalyzer test without actually knowing the results of that test?
 This guy will be forever labelled as a drunk driver now regardless of if he was actually impaired or not. Everyone in my office was talking about how he's an ####### drunk but no one actually knew the results of the test.
 
 Seem reckless.
 |  
The media doesn't care. If they can generate more anger and sensationalism, the more clicks they get and the more papers they sell.
 
But yes, it is BS.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 11:52 AM | #44 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by llwhiteoutll  The media doesn't care. If they can generate more anger and sensationalism, the more clicks they get and the more papers they sell.
 But yes, it is BS.
 |  
It may be BS, but it's standard operating procedure for reporting on any driving fatality. The reporter asks the police if drinking was involved, the police tell them whether they conducted a breathalyser (which I'm guessing is SOP for police in fatal collisions with surviving drivers).
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by fotze  If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 12:10 PM | #45 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			According to AM770, Calgary Police have confirmed that alcohol and speed were factors.  http://www.newstalk770.com/2016/03/2...lenmore-trail/ 
And I believe CTV Calgary mentioned that the individual was initially arrested on suspicion of being intoxicated...
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 12:58 PM | #46 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			Yeah, when someone is arrested pretty much at the scene of a fatal accident, it is very much a story in the public interest, regardless of the media's general desires for sensationalism.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 01:14 PM | #47 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			Does anyone know what exactly has to happen for speed and alcohol to be a factor?
 I remember reading an american article that said that for something to be considered a "factor" it just has to be present and doesn't have to actually be directly related to the cause or the person at-fault.
 
 Can't find anything about it on google now though.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 01:39 PM | #48 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Calgary Satellite Community      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by polak  Anyone think it's kind of BS that the media can release information about the police administering a Breathalyzer test without actually knowing the results of that test?
 This guy will be forever labelled as a drunk driver now regardless of if he was actually impaired or not. Everyone in my office was talking about how he's an ####### drunk but no one actually knew the results of the test.
 
 Seem reckless.
 |  
I have no problem with this at all.  If police feel that a breathalyzer is warranted, then I think its a valid public detail.  Its not like the police released the guys name.
 
IMO our justice system is still far too lenient on drunks that have killed people on our roads as it is.  Such a ridiculous waste of life.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to greyshep For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:15 PM | #49 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by greyshep  IMO our justice system is still far too lenient on drunks that have killed people on our roads as it is.  Such a ridiculous waste of life. |  
The problem isn't the degree of punishment after the fact, which is already severe enough that no sensible person is going to risk it. The problem is that the likelihood of getting caught is so low. Most drunk driving collisions causing fatalities involve hardcore boozers, many of them alcoholics. The deterrence of jail time doesn't work on those people. The only thing that will stop them is catching them drunk, taking away their license, and getting them off the road. But you can drive years on end in this city without hitting a check stop. I haven't hit one in 15 years.
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by fotze  If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan. |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:22 PM | #50 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Sylvan Lake      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CliffFletcher  The problem isn't the degree of punishment after the fact, which is already severe enough that no sensible person is going to risk it. The problem is that the likelihood of getting caught is so low. Most drunk driving collisions causing fatalities involve hardcore boozers, many of them alcoholics. The deterrence of jail time doesn't work on those people. The only thing that will stop them is catching them drunk, taking away their license, and getting them off the road. But you can drive years on end in this city without hitting a check stop. I haven't hit one in 15 years. |  
#### like this doesn't help.
https://twitter.com/calgarychecksto 
	Quote: 
	
		| this is for the .049ers.. those who want to be responsible yet would like the odds a little more in their favour.. DO NOT DRIVE DRUNK |  
				__________________Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
 
 Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:23 PM | #51 |  
	| Self Imposed Exile 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CliffFletcher  The problem isn't the degree of punishment after the fact, which is already severe enough that no sensible person is going to risk it. The problem is that the likelihood of getting caught is so low. Most drunk driving collisions causing fatalities involve hardcore boozers, many of them alcoholics. The deterrence of jail time doesn't work on those people. The only thing that will stop them is catching them drunk, taking away their license, and getting them off the road. But you can drive years on end in this city without hitting a check stop. I haven't hit one in 15 years. |  
This is it exactly. 
 
I have been through exactly one check stop in my life, and I was a passenger and it was 18 years ago. 
 
My average driving timing habits may or may not fit the times the cops are looking for drunks, but you would think by sheer statistics I would of hit a check stop by now, it is mind boggling.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:24 PM | #52 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I have a friend who was involved in a serious accident a few years ago, the officer smelled alcohol and had her blood tested, the media reported that it could be a case of drunk driving.
 Problem is she was the designated driver that night and the accident was determined not to be her fault but people still talked about her being a former drunk driver that nearly killed 2 people.
 
 I have no problem reporting a DUI but at least wait for it to be fact.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:27 PM | #53 |  
	| That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Springfield Penitentiary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by greyshep  I have no problem with this at all.  If police feel that a breathalyzer is warranted, then I think its a valid public detail.  Its not like the police released the guys name.
 IMO our justice system is still far too lenient on drunks that have killed people on our roads as it is.  Such a ridiculous waste of life.
 |  
Yeah but what does leniency on drunk drivers have anything to do with a potentially innocent person being labelled a killer?
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by undercoverbrother   |  
Lack of police resources is much bigger concern than some random Twitter feed.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:33 PM | #54 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by undercoverbrother   |  
Google Maps with traffic on can easily show checkstops too.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:41 PM | #55 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Sylvan Lake      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger  Lack of police resources is much bigger concern than some random Twitter feed. |  
You might be right, I think funding (or lack of) and policing has been an issue for a long time
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by polak  Google Maps with traffic on can easily show checkstops too. |  
I had no idea.  So police check stops show up on the Google Map app?
		 
				__________________Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
 
 Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:48 PM | #56 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by undercoverbrother  You might be right, I think funding (or lack of) and policing has been an issue for a long time
 
 
 
 I had no idea.  So police check stops show up on the Google Map app?
 |  
No but if you open Google Maps and see a spot of heavy traffic on your route at 3 am it's probably a checkstop or accident.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:49 PM | #57 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: BELTLINE      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by undercoverbrother  You might be right, I think funding (or lack of) and policing has been an issue for a long time
 
 
 
 I had no idea. So police check stops show up on the Google Map app?
 |  
Not per se but you can pretty easily spot where they might be.  
   
 I was looking for a route home from a friends house a couple weeks ago and saw that traffic was at a standstill on glenmore east of deerfoot at like 1 am...drove that route and it was a checkstop.  Although I doubt people who are severely drunk have the presence of mind to analyze google maps before they drive.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to DiracSpike For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 02:58 PM | #58 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			Has anyone heard from Minnie in the last 24 hours?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 06:02 PM | #59 |  
	| Guest | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by pylon  Has anyone heard from Minnie in the last 24 hours? |  
??????
		 |  
	|  |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  03-28-2016, 10:08 PM | #60 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: On your last nerve...:D      | 
 
			
			No. Haven't heard from her at all.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Minnie For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM. | 
 
 
 |