Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2016, 01:35 PM   #41
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

He'll be 29 when this kicks in, so it ends when he's 37. Essentially you need him to age like a Sedin (who are 35).

The Kings have done with their defense salary-wise. Their top 3 makes $15M/year until Doughty hits UFA in 2019.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 01:36 PM   #42
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
If the bridge contract wasn't dead before it is completely going to be dead moving forward.

Likely better off to sign a core piece for 8 years at 21/22. and that buys you his prime seasons but you have more flexibility to cut bait once he hits his 30s.

Opposed to signing him to a 3 or 4 year bridge, which means that next big 8 year contract is going to take him into his mid 30s.

From a asset perspective trading a good player going to UFA at 30, is likely going to garner more return then a guy who you may be selling off at 33 or 34.

It's funny to think that the Kings likely wish they went longer than 7 years when they signed him to that contract as a 21 year old off his ELC.
I dunno, Subban's post-bridge contract looking a lot better than these ones.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 01:40 PM   #43
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Yikes this is gonna be bad for LA when Kopitar is 33+
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 01:42 PM   #44
Teh_Bandwagoner
First Line Centre
 
Teh_Bandwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryH93 View Post
I can see this blowing up in LA's face a few years down the road. Then I'll come back to this thread and bump it and we can all laugh at LA
Do we get to laugh at them if they get one or two more cups on the way to the "blow up"?
__________________
Teh_Bandwagoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 02:49 PM   #45
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
This ones gonna smell so bad in a couple of years

Oh don't worry, it's the Kings we're talking about. I'm sure by then they will have uncovered that 5 years ago he drove a dune-buggy without a helmet, or some other similar BS, making his contract void. The cap rules don't apply to the Kings.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 02:51 PM   #46
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Yikes this is gonna be bad for LA when Kopitar is 33+
Don't worry they'll just call up Gary and he'll let them weasel out it... and then the sportscasters will all tell us that we need to shed some tears for poor Dean Lombardi.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 03:44 PM   #47
BACKCHECK!!!
First Line Centre
 
BACKCHECK!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: TEXAS!!
Exp:
Default

I'd take that contract on the Flames every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.

Since the cap was put in place, star players have always been underpaid relative to their contribution to winning, and support players overpaid.

The Flames usually pay their 4th line and bottom defence pairing a solid $15m, sometimes more depending on the lineup.

Given my choice, I'd rather have prospects and waiver-wire pickups playing 4th line minutes, and as many $10m players in the line-up as possible.
__________________
I am a lunatic whose world revolves around hockey and Oilers hate.
BACKCHECK!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BACKCHECK!!! For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2016, 04:13 PM   #48
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Wow. Does he get a full NMC and daily ass kisses as well? He got everything in this deal. Term and dollars. Did they even negotiate?
Kings had ZERO leverage in this negotiation. He can ask for the terms, salary. If they say no, he goes to open market and gets it from some other team, slightly less term but then they lose him for nothing.

It was really up to Kopitar to get maximum or give a bit of hometown discount and he chose not to. I like it.

The deal will haunt the Kings in few years.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 04:24 PM   #49
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BACKCHECK!!! View Post
I'd take that contract on the Flames every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.

Since the cap was put in place, star players have always been underpaid relative to their contribution to winning, and support players overpaid.

The Flames usually pay their 4th line and bottom defence pairing a solid $15m, sometimes more depending on the lineup.

Given my choice, I'd rather have prospects and waiver-wire pickups playing 4th line minutes, and as many $10m players in the line-up as possible.
Fair point. Who wouldn't trade Stajan, Raymond, Backlund and Engelland for Kopitar, Schlemko, Grant and Shore?

The money evens out. (But you still have to be concerned about the term).

And if you are paying your stars big money, you just have to be more disciplined about how you pay bottom line and bottom pairing guys. All about entry level deals, AHLers and waiver wire pickups.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 04:31 PM   #50
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
I dunno, Subban's post-bridge contract looking a lot better than these ones.
The difference between Subbans $9M and Kopitars $10M is mostly because the market for centers is higher then d-men right now.

PK Subban likely could have been signed for something like 10 years and $70 million back in 2012, and he'd only be a $7 million cap hit.

Instead he had:

$2 years at $2.875M, and now 8 years with a $9M AAV.

Could potentially have saved $8 Million and a lot of the cap hit over the next 8 years by just avoiding the bridge and signing long term then.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2016, 04:40 PM   #51
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

I would much rather pay elite players $10M/per over paying 6 guys $3mil+ a season to play 12 mins if they are lucky and just be muckers who are defensively responsible.

If you have 4 guys on a team eating up $30M, and the other 30M goes to 19 other players, that would be fine with me.

Its the Matt Stajan's of the world making $4M/yr that bothers me. Or Goalies who are going to get 20 games a season, if they are lucky, making over $4M a season.
2 guys right there that could get you a Kopitar type player.

Dennis Wideman making $4M a season to try and back hand the puck to nowhere every time he gets possession.

I have no problem paying elite players elite salaries. Its the bottom players making upwards of $5M a season that I dont understand.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IgiTang For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2016, 04:48 PM   #52
spuzzum
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Yikes this is gonna be bad for LA when Kopitar is 33+
Wasn't 20 supposed to be the new 30, 30 be the new 40 and so on. Man, I did not realize if you were 33 that they should take you out back and get shot.
spuzzum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spuzzum For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2016, 05:09 PM   #53
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Meh when Kopitar is 33+, the NHL CBA will have expired and I am sure the NHL will throw out another round of get out of cap jail compliance buyouts for all the rich teams to escape their mistakes.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 05:28 PM   #54
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Meh when Kopitar is 33+, the NHL CBA will have expired and I am sure the NHL will throw out another round of get out of cap jail compliance buyouts for all the rich teams to escape their mistakes.
There is probably more truth to this than most are willing to admit.
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 05:38 PM   #55
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_pinched View Post
Do the Kings have any money left to sign Lucic?
Doubt it. I thought when they acquired him that most people thought they wouldn't be able to re-sign him.

Love the Flames to take a run at him as an UFA. He'd be a very close flight to his hometown Vancouver and could play in Canada again. Dunno if that's important to him or not.

Ferland on one line, Lucic on another, drool.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2016, 08:02 PM   #56
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Meh when Kopitar is 33+, the NHL CBA will have expired and I am sure the NHL will throw out another round of get out of cap jail compliance buyouts for all the rich teams to escape their mistakes.
and cue the whining that ensues
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 08:33 PM   #57
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
I kind of hate the precedent though. Chicago and LA both have sacrificed their futures to win the cup.

Dreading Calgary having to have the same mentality.
Pretty much what we tried doing with Iginla/Regehr/Kiprusoff/etc. I get it if you think you are close, then you go for it. I wasn't ok with it when it was obvious we need to rebuild, but went for it anyways with Brad Richards.

We also tried cheating the system by back diving contracts, we were the first... but lets not that get in the way of all the Mike Richards whining.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 08:34 PM   #58
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
I would much rather pay elite players $10M/per over paying 6 guys $3mil+ a season to play 12 mins if they are lucky and just be muckers who are defensively responsible.

If you have 4 guys on a team eating up $30M, and the other 30M goes to 19 other players, that would be fine with me.

Its the Matt Stajan's of the world making $4M/yr that bothers me. Or Goalies who are going to get 20 games a season, if they are lucky, making over $4M a season.
2 guys right there that could get you a Kopitar type player.

Dennis Wideman making $4M a season to try and back hand the puck to nowhere every time he gets possession.

I have no problem paying elite players elite salaries. Its the bottom players making upwards of $5M a season that I dont understand.
yeah its kind of funny... Kopitar is a top 5 player in the league, will make what Denis Wideman + Matt Stajan make... people think this is a bad signing. LOL
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 09:02 PM   #59
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Doubt it. I thought when they acquired him that most people thought they wouldn't be able to re-sign him.

Love the Flames to take a run at him as an UFA. He'd be a very close flight to his hometown Vancouver and could play in Canada again. Dunno if that's important to him or not.

Ferland on one line, Lucic on another, drool.
And i'm fairly certain he's good buddies with Bouma. If I recall correctly he even mentioned Bouma when interviewed on the ice after winning the cup.

Plus I think he was genuinely impressed by the Iginla ceremony.

I think if we take a run at him we'll have a shot.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2016, 09:50 PM   #60
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
yeah its kind of funny... Kopitar is a top 5 player in the league, will make what Denis Wideman + Matt Stajan make... people think this is a bad signing. LOL
Those are two terrible contracts too.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy