10-25-2015, 10:20 PM
|
#41
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
|
Eichel would have roofed that shot and there would be no debate if it was in or not.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hockey For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:21 PM
|
#42
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I don't disagree in that you can't overturn the call, but the puck was in
|
If it was in they would have overturned the call so how dont you disagree?
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:22 PM
|
#43
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey
Eichel would have roofed that shot and there would be no debate if it was in or not.
|
Yes, because he's a right handed shot.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:22 PM
|
#44
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
If it was in they would have overturned the call so how dont you disagree?
|
Do I have to have the same standard as the NHL now???
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:24 PM
|
#45
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
As Flames fans, we know all too well the puck being across the line simply isn't enough sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:24 PM
|
#46
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
Yes, because he's a right handed shot.
|
Well pretend he's not or if the play happened on the other side.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:24 PM
|
#47
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
Those Flames playoff goals were much clearer goals and they didn't count.
|
This. A million times this!
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:27 PM
|
#48
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey
Well pretend he's not or if the play happened on the other side.
|
Or we can pretend it was Tony Amonte out of retirement and he hit the post.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:30 PM
|
#49
|
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
As Flames fans, we know all too well the puck being across the line simply isn't enough sometimes.
|
Game six.
Is anyone OK with this type of goal being called off? Bush league.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:32 PM
|
#50
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
|
The old parralax angle.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:32 PM
|
#51
|
|
NOT a cool kid
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordies Elbow
Game six.
Is anyone OK with this type of goal being called off? Bush league.
|
It's Edmonton...so, yes?
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:34 PM
|
#52
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordies Elbow
Game six.
Is anyone OK with this type of goal being called off? Bush league.
|
Personally, I think Gelinas, Bennett and McDavid all scored.
But the NHL has made it clear that certain angles and/or logic do not matter.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:34 PM
|
#53
|
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbo
It's Edmonton...so, yes?
|
Edmonton was a regular season game, with really nothing on the line.
Game six? Well, I guess it was the precedent.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:35 PM
|
#54
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
The League has set and followed the precedent that the won't call those types of goals, from those angles as in. Consistent application is all we can ask for.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:37 PM
|
#55
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
Do I have to have the same standard as the NHL now???
|
Well I would expect so. Haven't seen the video yet but from that angle it is impossible to say it was in. And I don't think it was in, in 04 either.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:38 PM
|
#56
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
|
All the Oilers fans are saying they are screwed by the NHL again. Um, okayyy...
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:39 PM
|
#57
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Again?!?! When was the last time?
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:41 PM
|
#58
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
Well I would expect so. Haven't seen the video yet but from that angle it is impossible to say it was in. And I don't think it was in, in 04 either.
|
Wait, so I have to be 100% sure to think it's in? Ok...
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2015, 10:57 PM
|
#59
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Again?!?! When was the last time?
|
When they didn't win the lottery in 2013 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-26-2015, 01:38 AM
|
#60
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
Wait, so I have to be 100% sure to think it's in? Ok...
|
No, but you should have to be 100% sure to italicize the word "was"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I don't disagree in that you can't overturn the call, but the puck was in
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GoJetsGo For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.
|
|
