Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-11-2015, 06:55 AM   #41
flamesfan55
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesfan55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I see the Flames taking a run at Franson. So I would be ok with that.
flamesfan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 07:11 AM   #42
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

If its a wish list, I'd like to see

1) A Big Scoring Top 6 Winger.
2) A Big Strong Blue Chip D Prospect that is close
3) Raymond Moved out
4) Ramo Signed 2 years at most, Hiller traded
5) An experienced AHL goaltender signed
6) Schlemko Retained
7) Smart contracts with Bouma, Backlund, that set the tone for Monahan and Gaudreau next year.

The lineup I kind of have penciled in right now.

Gaudreau-Monahan-XXXX
Hudler-Bennett-Colborne
Bouma-Backlund-Jones
Ferland-Stajan-XXXX
Bolig-Granlund-Jooris

Giordano-Brodie
Russell-Wideman
Shlemko-Engelland
Wotherspoon-XXXX

Ramo
Ortio
Gillies

I love the idea of playing Hudler with Bennet, the guy seems to excel as a mentor.

That looks like an offense that could score by committee.

After this season looking at our current top 4 unless a trade happens, I just don't see who you would bump out of the top 4. That's why I think a blue chip prospect would be more useful that a guy who is ready to go.

Not sure what happens with Smid & Byron. Maybe they fill in the empty spots in my roster, in both their situations the future is pretty unclear.

I'd also like to see a good goaltender pushing Gillies right from the start.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 07:18 AM   #43
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

A big physical RW that can play top line minutes and add to team toughness.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 07:28 AM   #44
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Not sure what all the fuss about Franson is about as he was a healthy scratch for Nashville down the stretch and into the playoffs... Their season tanked after they made that trade with the Leafs. I hope we avoid dumb contracts for mediocre players.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 07:29 AM   #45
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Icon32

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
#1 goalie
This is the biggest positional need. The 1A/1B thing was just good enough. The Flames really do need that unquestioned starting goaltender that can play 60 games. They don't have that guy. Getting one is easier said than done however. They can always ride out Hiller for the last year of his deal and find out what they have in Ortio but I expect that the Flames will be looking to deal for a guy like Reimer with one of their 2nd round picks.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 07:31 AM   #46
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

- Matt Beleskey
- A legitimate 5/6 Dman. I am not comfortable with any of Diaz, Smid, or Wotherspoon (yet) in this spot
- Re-sign Ramo, trade Hiller
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 07:47 AM   #47
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
I don't see the need for a top 4 defenseman. I think we have a great top 4. Bottom pairing for sure though.
We need a guy who can handle big, power forwards on the second pairing. Move Wideman to the 3rd pairing, and keep him on the pp.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 07:48 AM   #48
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Why does Seabrook's name come up so often? He's got 1 year left on his contract. I sure hope nobody is wanting to trade for him, as that'd likely cost our 1st rounders in 2016, 2017, and a decent roster player. Coburn and Sekera got a ransom this past deadline, and neither of them a close to the player Seabrook is.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 07:51 AM   #49
chedder
Franchise Player
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
We need a guy who can handle big, power forwards on the second pairing. Move Wideman to the 3rd pairing, and keep him on the pp.
I agree. A Regher 2.0 type would be awesome.
chedder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 07:58 AM   #50
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Why does Seabrook's name come up so often? He's got 1 year left on his contract. I sure hope nobody is wanting to trade for him, as that'd likely cost our 1st rounders in 2016, 2017, and a decent roster player. Coburn and Sekera got a ransom this past deadline, and neither of them a close to the player Seabrook is.
The hawks cap situation is pretty bad with the raises for Kane and Toews kicking in next year. They're going to have make at least one move to get rid of a big contract. IF they were desperate enough and had to trade him or were at lest open to it I think it would be worth exploring at the least. I can see them trading Sharp (who I think we should target) but I could also see them trading Seabrook too.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:08 AM   #51
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
The hawks cap situation is pretty bad with the raises for Kane and Toews kicking in next year. They're going to have make at least one move to get rid of a big contract. IF they were desperate enough and had to trade him or were at lest open to it I think it would be worth exploring at the least. I can see them trading Sharp (who I think we should target) but I could also see them trading Seabrook too.
I agree that they'll need to make a move for cap reasons, but I do not agree that we should be in the market for Seabrook. He's in the wrong age range for us to be giving up assets, and he'll fetch A LOT of assets.

Absolutely take a run at him if he makes it to free agency. Hope we pass on trading for him though.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:13 AM   #52
Bezer
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: H E double hockey sticks
Exp:
Default

I wouldn't mind the Flames looking at Brendan Dillion he's a UFA and big nasty player. I don't think the price would be unreasonable.
Bezer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bezer For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 08:16 AM   #53
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bezer View Post
I wouldn't mind the Flames looking at Brendan Dillion he's a UFA and big nasty player. I don't think the price would be unreasonable.
That's one guy I feel like he is going to re-sign with his team. I don't think the Sharks traded for him only to let him walk. Especially at 24 years old.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:17 AM   #54
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

interesting offseasons, especially when you look at how many Dmen that are in that range of top4-5 with some experience & size that are available.

i wonder how creative the flames will be on the forward side of things with guys like raymond, jooris, colborne, and where they feel they are at with some of the forwards from the heat/scratch-list like granlund, shore, reinhart, arnold, etc.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:19 AM   #55
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

the needs are pretty obvious to me....improve the blueline with another solid guy who can fit in as a 3-4-5 (along with Russell & Wideman)
Improve the 2nd and 3rd line Wingers...particularly on RW

Last edited by Red Menace; 05-11-2015 at 08:23 AM.
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:31 AM   #56
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
I agree that they'll need to make a move for cap reasons, but I do not agree that we should be in the market for Seabrook. He's in the wrong age range for us to be giving up assets, and he'll fetch A LOT of assets.

Absolutely take a run at him if he makes it to free agency. Hope we pass on trading for him though.
He's only 30. Gio, Wideman and Engelland are all older than him. He's a top pairing defender and would cost a lot but I think depending on what they'd ask, it would be worth it to get him at a reasonable price instead of overpaying and having a bad contract. If things didn't work out, he could always be traded at the deadline to recoup assets.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:38 AM   #57
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Oh ya, extend Hartley, Gio, Hudler, Johnny, Monahan, Colborne (unless he's traded), Backlund(unless he's traded), Bouma, Jooris(unless he's traded) and Russell. These guys call all be extended after July 1st so get it done asap.
Hartley has already been extended.

I think the main thing this team needs is a big, physical top 4 defenceman. Ideally with a right handed shot.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2015, 08:41 AM   #58
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
This is the biggest positional need. The 1A/1B thing was just good enough. The Flames really do need that unquestioned starting goaltender that can play 60 games. They don't have that guy. Getting one is easier said than done however. They can always ride out Hiller for the last year of his deal and find out what they have in Ortio but I expect that the Flames will be looking to deal for a guy like Reimer with one of their 2nd round picks.
Lol, what? Reimer?
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 08:42 AM   #59
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
He's only 30. Gio, Wideman and Engelland are all older than him. He's a top pairing defender and would cost a lot but I think depending on what they'd ask, it would be worth it to get him at a reasonable price instead of overpaying and having a bad contract. If things didn't work out, he could always be traded at the deadline to recoup assets.
Those 3 Dmen were all acquired for free. If you can get Seabrook for free in the summer of 2016 without paying him 9M+, then we should pursue that.

A rebuilding team can not be giving up the type of assets it'd take to land a 30 year old Seabrook. As fantastic as this season was, lets not lose sight of who we're building this team around (Gaudreau/Monahan/Bennett/Brodie/**) and our long term goal. We need to keep all of our young assets + picks, and develop high qualilty support for these players so that we can contend for the next 10+ years.


**I really wanted to put Gillies there, but can not put him in that group until he earns it at the NHL level
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 05-11-2015, 08:45 AM   #60
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I wish for the new arena to be announced.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy