Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Pick the best prospect from the following
Acolatse 1 0.27%
Agostino 7 1.90%
Arnold 35 9.49%
Billins 0 0%
Carroll 0 0%
Culkin 0 0%
Cundari 0 0%
Deblouw 0 0%
Elson 0 0%
Ferland 7 1.90%
Gilmour 0 0%
Hanowski 1 0.27%
Harrison 0 0%
Hickey 0 0%
Jankowski 190 51.49%
Jooris 0 0%
Kanzig 7 1.90%
Knight 13 3.52%
Kulak 9 2.44%
McDonald 1 0.27%
Ollas Mattson 0 0%
Rafikov 0 0%
Ramage 0 0%
Roy 0 0%
Sieloff 90 24.39%
Smith 2 0.54%
Thiessen 0 0%
Van Brabant 0 0%
Wolf 6 1.63%
Voters: 369. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2014, 10:21 AM   #41
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
the other is a shut down defenceman.
Most guys who ended up as shutdown defensemen in the NHL produced better then he did at the junior level and are at least reliable minute eaters... at this point I'm not sure he can stay healthy enough to even do that (only 71 league games over the last three years).

Last edited by Parallex; 07-22-2014 at 10:24 AM.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 10:24 AM   #42
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
One is a potential top 6 center that should be putting up points, the other is a stay at home defenceman and he's not expected to put up points.
i believe there are statistics out there that show that any impactful dman in the NHL (ie. regular top4) was getting points as they moved up the ranks of youth and minor hockey. Even the most defensive/shutdown NHL dmen put up points in their youth.

Sieloff would be the exception to the rule if he did become an impactful dman, however, i think most people have seen so little of him, it is hard to justify him as an outlier to the rule that the stats suggest.

A guy like wotherspoon put up 30-40 points in his last few years in portland, whereas sieloff never got close.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 10:31 AM   #43
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

not to derail the thread, as this topic of Dmen putting up points in junior being critical in assessing if a prospect will make it in the NHL is an extremely fascinating one, but here's an excellent article on the topic:

http://thats-offside.blogspot.ca/201...and-draft.html
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2014, 10:33 AM   #44
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Nm. bubbsy linked to it above.

Last edited by Parallex; 07-22-2014 at 10:35 AM.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 10:46 AM   #45
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I picked Kanzig, but I already changed my mind. I think it should be Jankowski.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 10:56 AM   #46
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

For me, Kanzig will be soon just because I like him and think he has potential. Hopefully Janko pans out but I think he's more important and valuable to the franchise.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:01 AM   #47
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I personally believe Kulak, and maybe Culkin, should be higher than Sieloff.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2014, 11:04 AM   #48
kermitology
It's not easy being green!
 
kermitology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Jankowski. I agree that if Sieloff hadn't missed a year he'd be gone already, but it's a big concern when a guy misses an entire year during development.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
kermitology is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:06 AM   #49
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Went with Arnold. The Flames' scouts have him much higher on their rankings.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:07 AM   #50
Ulrith
Backup Goalie
 
Ulrith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Choosing between Sieloff and Janko and went Sieloff this time. I think the potential is higher with Janko but even after a couple years he still looks fairly underwhelming to me.
Ulrith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:10 AM   #51
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Was stuck between Kanzig and Smith, might be just all the negativity on Jankowski but I'm not all that high on him and I haven't seen him play much.

If Kanzig or Smith can put the pieces together they could be difference makers.

Sieloff is somewhere in there too.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:22 AM   #52
Pierre "Monster" McGuire
Franchise Player
 
Pierre "Monster" McGuire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Exp:
Default

I'm on the Jankowski wagon this round. SureLoss made a hell of a convincing argument regarding rookie to sophomore points production (as compared to Kreider and Hayes).

I think Janko's ceiling might be the highest left on the board. I nearly voted for Knight because he had such an outstanding rookie season and all signs point to him having a career year this season.
Pierre "Monster" McGuire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:26 AM   #53
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Seiloff, he would already be an NHLer if it were not for some bad luck last year.


Also FYP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Results so far

10. Gillies (finished 2nd in 7th, 8th, and 9th round)
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 11:41 AM   #54
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Jankowski has the highest ceiling, potential top 6 centre, but also with his frame and room for growth, could even slot in as a depth guy. His college program does seem committed to working on his whole game, which is a plus.
It gets tougher from here, as Smith and McDonald have potential but are so raw, they need to keep progressing. The upside is there though, but it gets into a debate between the new draftees and guys like Kulak, Arnold, Ferland and Knight, who have shown that whilst I wouldn't pencil them in as potential top line/first pairing guys, they look like solid depth players. Seiloff, due to missing that year falls in with the uncertain recent draftees IMO. Next few rounds will be a real mixed bag
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 12:04 PM   #55
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Jankowski again - see him as having the highest upside left out of any prospect, and IMO his floor is rising and starting to ease the 'bust' scare around him. Think he is going to be a very, very important player for the Flames in the coming years.

Is it just me, or can you legitimately start comparing the prospects in this round and later available in the poll and compare them to the pre-2010 prospect lists? I think Jankowski has more upside than a guy like Chucko, and is a much better skater than Nemisz with softer hands, etc. Go down the list, and Kulak is probably at the same area (maybe slightly ahead) than TJ Brodie was (though Brodie had an incredible development arc after catching on with the Flames). Guys like Ferland, Culkin, Sieloff, Knight (has he ever fallen this year, and for no good reason as he had an EXCELLENT first year), Arnold who looks like a very good 3rd line center that carries a line defensively and has some offensive abilities.. the list goes on.

I would rank the remaining prospects on par to any year in the past prior to 2010, at least for a couple of years. It may not be better than all of those years - or even any - but I do think the rest of the list is somewhat comparable to full lists of many prior years. To think 10 of the Flames' best prospects (arguable, since many people still have a couple in their top 10 not yet chosen, but you get the idea) have already been chosen, and that this remaining list is actually still fairly comparable speaks volumes about how much big of a step organizationally this franchise has taken.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2014, 12:29 PM   #56
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Janko now, Kulak next. Kulak
RyZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 12:33 PM   #57
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Jankowski again - see him as having the highest upside left out of any prospect, and IMO his floor is rising and starting to ease the 'bust' scare around him. Think he is going to be a very, very important player for the Flames in the coming years.

Is it just me, or can you legitimately start comparing the prospects in this round and later available in the poll and compare them to the pre-2010 prospect lists? I think Jankowski has more upside than a guy like Chucko, and is a much better skater than Nemisz with softer hands, etc. Go down the list, and Kulak is probably at the same area (maybe slightly ahead) than TJ Brodie was (though Brodie had an incredible development arc after catching on with the Flames). Guys like Ferland, Culkin, Sieloff, Knight (has he ever fallen this year, and for no good reason as he had an EXCELLENT first year), Arnold who looks like a very good 3rd line center that carries a line defensively and has some offensive abilities.. the list goes on.

I would rank the remaining prospects on par to any year in the past prior to 2010, at least for a couple of years. It may not be better than all of those years - or even any - but I do think the rest of the list is somewhat comparable to full lists of many prior years. To think 10 of the Flames' best prospects (arguable, since many people still have a couple in their top 10 not yet chosen, but you get the idea) have already been chosen, and that this remaining list is actually still fairly comparable speaks volumes about how much big of a step organizationally this franchise has taken.
Yup. Was going to say something similar. With the top 10 gone, the next 10 looks something like this:

Jankowski
Sieloff
Arnold
Ferland
Knight
Agostino
Wolf
Smith
McDonald
Ramage

and still going strong

I would put that list up against any from the 2004-09 era.

And that still leaves Kulak, Culkin, Cundari, Kanzig, Hickey, Ollas Mattson, Rafikov and Roy, just on the point.

Last edited by Enoch Root; 07-22-2014 at 12:36 PM.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2014, 12:36 PM   #58
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Yup. Was going to say something similar. With the top 10 gone, the next 10 looks something like this:

Jankowski
Sieloff
Arnold
Ferland
Knight
Agostino
Wolf
Smith
McDonald
Ramage

and still going strong

I would put that list up against any from the 2004-09 era.
Between Phanuef and Baertschi. I think Backlund is the only prospect we had that could top that list.

And I actually have Kanzig near the top of that list. After seeing him skate this summer, I think he has a good chance of doing well with some strong coaching.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 12:41 PM   #59
Nehkara
Franchise Player
 
Nehkara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

This vote for me is a hard one. Agostino, Arnold, Jankowski, and Sieloff all in the running in my mind.

I'm going with Agostino.
__________________

Huge thanks to Dion for the signature!
Nehkara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 12:46 PM   #60
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Janko easy choice for me here.

After that it gets tricky though. I can see arguments for Sieloff, Agostino, Knight, Ferland, Kanzig, Kulak, Culkin, Arnold or even Smith. Tight grouping coming up.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy