Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2014, 11:15 AM   #41
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
i'm fine with that as long as its not with us
Well I guess that depends on what the other options are as if he leaves another defenseman needs to be signed and I don't want to see a $5+ million defenseman from this years weak crop of UFA defensemen.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:18 AM   #42
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Well I guess that depends on what the other options are as if he leaves another defenseman needs to be signed and I don't want to see a $5+ million defenseman from this years weak crop of UFA defensemen.
Well there are options like the waiver wire after training camp too. I wouldn't mind Butler back at a reasonable salary, but he shouldn't be paid anything more then a No 4-5 d-man.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:25 AM   #43
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Well there are options like the waiver wire after training camp too. I wouldn't mind Butler back at a reasonable salary, but he shouldn't be paid anything more then a No 4-5 d-man.
Don't care about salary. At all.
Just term.
Happy to have him back, but no more than 2 year term.
And that's why it will either have to be over priced, or won't happen at all, imo. Butler will naturally want longer term - and Flames must stay away from that.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 11:33 AM   #44
Dajazz
Scoring Winger
 
Dajazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Holmgren is hilarious. How does he still have his job... Flyers should have imploded already, but somehow they always seem to recover.
Dajazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 12:13 PM   #45
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Well there are options like the waiver wire after training camp too. I wouldn't mind Butler back at a reasonable salary, but he shouldn't be paid anything more then a No 4-5 d-man.
Like Eldrick said I would be okay giving him close to market value on a two year deal max. Chances are he may be in the $4 million range to which I would probably investigate the rest of the market. The thing about Butler is you either bring him in a long term deal for low dollars without a NTC (so you can move him easily when you feel younger players are ready to step up) or a short term deal for close to market value. They can't sign him at market value for long term as IMO that would be a mistake.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2014, 12:45 PM   #46
Philly06Cup
Closet Jedi
 
Philly06Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

I watch every Flyers game. Judging by the 19 games he's played with the Flyers, he's been their best D-man. LoL at calling him a 3rd pair D-man, and the comparisons to Butler.

He's been averaging more minutes than any other Flyers D-man since his arrival. Timonen is a UFA -- either going to retire or see a reduced roll -- and Streit is also an aging Dman. MacDonald fills the void of a good, young, puck moving defenseman. He also leads the league in blocked shots.

5 mil a year is fair for what he brings, especially looking at the UFA D-man pool.
__________________
Gaudreau > Huberdeau AINEC
Philly06Cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 02:49 PM   #47
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Like Eldrick said I would be okay giving him close to market value on a two year deal max. Chances are he may be in the $4 million range to which I would probably investigate the rest of the market. The thing about Butler is you either bring him in a long term deal for low dollars without a NTC (so you can move him easily when you feel younger players are ready to step up) or a short term deal for close to market value. They can't sign him at market value for long term as IMO that would be a mistake.
IMO I would go with 2 years, $2.5M per.. which I guess compared to this might look low, but the key is that Butler/contract have to be readily moveable and should never be seen as an anchor. Look at this years trade deadline, how many teams had to eat salary..... these days, teams simply can't afford to have players paid well above their worth, and Butler's contract has to be movable.

If not..... like I said, at the end of training camp, there are always 5-6 guys available on the waiver wire who can probably come in and fill that bottom pairing role. Might not be as good as Butler, but won't come with an anchor contract too. And there is always the waiver wire... I'm hoping that Butler takes a discount and we lock him up for $2.5M for a few years. Especially for a team that isn't likely to challenge for a playoff position, its not a huge problem to fill taht No 5-6 position that it might have been a few years ago when we had to plug that No 5 position with a guy like Marchment or Staois.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 03:05 PM   #48
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly06Cup View Post
I watch every Flyers game. Judging by the 19 games he's played with the Flyers, he's been their best D-man. LoL at calling him a 3rd pair D-man, and the comparisons to Butler.

He's been averaging more minutes than any other Flyers D-man since his arrival. Timonen is a UFA -- either going to retire or see a reduced roll -- and Streit is also an aging Dman. MacDonald fills the void of a good, young, puck moving defenseman. He also leads the league in blocked shots.

5 mil a year is fair for what he brings, especially looking at the UFA D-man pool.
Blocked shots are an interesting stat because of what they don't tell. Butler is 2nd in that category, by the way. The reason his blocked shots number is so high is because when he's on the ice, the other team is controlling the puck in our end, and taking a lot of shot attempts. It's basically a compensation skill in his case. Not sure about Macdonald.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 03:09 PM   #49
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

I think it is too much but he is a much better player than Butler or Wideman.

The term is the worst part of the deal. I think 4 x 4 makes sense for him but no need to add the extra money term. If he didn't sign it wasn't like the Glyers were screwed they could go out and get someone similar easily.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 03:26 PM   #50
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
I think it is too much but he is a much better player than Butler or Wideman.
I agree but Wideman was signed for his offense. Everybody knew he wasn't good defensively and a potential bench warmer in the playoffs because he is a defensive liability.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 03:48 PM   #51
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Wow, I guess that is the going rate for a second pairing defenseman now. That's a lot for MacDonald though in money and term. I can see why the Islanders weren't able to re-sign him.

Philly seems to have a strategy of acquiring soon to be UFA defensemen and signing them to large extensions. It worked out with Pronger until he got hurt but hasn't really worked out with the others.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy