Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2014, 01:48 PM   #41
ae118
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
CBC radio has always annoyed me to an extent. There's some really dull programs on there and most of everything comes across as from the baby boomer generation's point of view, or generally catered to the middle aged to senior population. While they've been willing to cover just about every and any story, there's always been a level of closed mindedness on a lot of issues that seeps through because of that. The comedy programs on the weekends can be entertaining.. the debaters, I think it's called? That's a good one. But generally I'm not a big fan.

I think Michael Enright fits into the category you've described, but I actually think a lot of the programming caters to a younger audience these days (Q, DNTO, The Debaters, etc.). And rather than close-mindedness, I hear just the opposite in most shows, and I'm pretty quick to be bothered by things like that. Honestly, it's a cliche, but it really does get me thinking and keep me informed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ae118 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ae118 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2014, 02:02 PM   #42
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

What does this mean for Ron and Don?
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:03 PM   #43
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
What does this mean for Ron and Don?
Nothing. It was already announced that Coach's Corner will continue for the foreseeable future.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:03 PM   #44
Galakanokis
#1 Goaltender
 
Galakanokis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Did they hire you?
No thank god. I told them to piss off after I got a random call from the Chief Engineer at 4 in the morning rather bluntly asking me if I was excepting the job or not and when was I starting. I hadn't even received the written proposal from them yet, salary, benefits, holidays etc. Plus once I did get their offer it wasn't even close to what we had negotiated over the phone or during the board.

Bush league.
Galakanokis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:12 PM   #45
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galakanokis View Post
Pretty sure they pay people to do absolutely nothing around there.
That's a by-product of most government operations. I shudder to think about just how much of the billions they have received in taxpayer money over the years has been completely wasted and misused.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:22 PM   #46
Troubamaker
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

How can anyone hate a station that gave us the Beachcombers? I hope Relic visits you in all your dreams.
Troubamaker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Troubamaker For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2014, 02:39 PM   #47
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Nothing. It was already announced that Coach's Corner will continue for the foreseeable future.
I get that. But what's the "foreseeable future"? Does that window get reduced? Is HNIC on CBC done after this season or do they start making cuts immediately?

I would rather my tax payer dollars go to retaining many hardworking Canadians for the " foreseeable future" rather than employing Ron and Don and many others of the HNIC panel.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:40 PM   #48
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

A lot of really talented people are gonna be out of work.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2014, 02:48 PM   #49
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

A lot of CBC radio programming seems to me to not be "in the national interest", and therefore not something we need to subsidize.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:49 PM   #50
Galakanokis
#1 Goaltender
 
Galakanokis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sadly not in the Dome.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
That's a by-product of most government operations. I shudder to think about just how much of the billions they have received in taxpayer money over the years has been completely wasted and misused.
One story I know well is Sony made a machine called the BVW-75 which at the time (late 80' to mid 90's) was a high end VCR, professional level coming it at around $75k to $95K depending on options. The CBC already had a number of these through out Canada, no big deal they were the it technology in the business at the time and were still used heavily in the mid 2000's.

Component Serial Digital (CCIR 601) was just starting to emerge in the early 90's and the CBC had to have it. They paid Sony to adopt a line of the 75's to handle the new digital standard. This would give them analog tape to a digital output. Sony even told them that they were developing a new, completely digital machine that would have an option to play the old analog tapes and would be ready in a year or two. Not fast enough for the good old CBC.

Now also keep in mind going digital required a completely new infrastructure for your building, cable, patchfields, routers were no longer compatible. Didn't matter to the CBC. So Sony pushes ahead with these new digital BVW machines and eventually do come out at a price tag of over $100K. Not 100% certain but I am pretty sure the CBC were the only company in the world to buy these machines to the tune of 30 I believe. Less than a year later Sony came out with the DVW-500 (a most excellent machine) that made CBC's DVW-75 completely irrelevant. Of course the CBC had to have the shinny new toys and abandoned the BVW's. They were sold off but a fraction of the price. I had one or two when I worked in Edmonton and two or three out here in Vancouver but they were a rare machine for sure.

An absolute waste of money when it was needed and they were not even ready to use. We completely rebuilt Super Channel in the mid 90's to take advantage of SDI. No easy task unless you are moving buildings.

Heard that story from two different people over a span of two years. Both times the machine was referred to as the CBC Special and it is what we called it every time we had to work on it.
Galakanokis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Galakanokis For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2014, 02:59 PM   #51
ae118
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp:
Default CBC to cut 657 jobs and no longer compete for professional sport rights

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
A lot of CBC radio programming seems to me to not be "in the national interest", and therefore not something we need to subsidize.

I'm not sure why you'd get that impression. I listen to Radio 1 and sometimes Radio 3, and they are absolutely meeting their mandate.

http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/explore/mandate/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by ae118; 04-10-2014 at 03:13 PM.
ae118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 11:13 PM   #52
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

To save cbc I think you have to kill the main tv network. Make CBC Newsworld the main station and stick to news. Let CTV and specialty channels develop Canadian shows and assume the risk. When you have jeopardy, wheel of fortune and coronation street as the top programs on a network that is supposed to deliver and promote Canadian content, there's a problem.

Have to keep radio but maybe you don't need radio one and two. Don't get me wrong I would like both but is funding there? Maybe you kill radio three and the online stuff in order to save one and two.

I question the allocation of funding. 400k plus for McLean and 800k for Cherry? Maybe they need to look at their payscales as the reason why they are always in crisis.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
Old 04-10-2014, 11:29 PM   #53
kremb
Scoring Winger
 
kremb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
I can't wait for the day when this $1.2B waste of money is shut down for good.
and that stupid PBS that has other people saying things I don't agree with too.
__________________
http://imgur.com/uWgYS
kremb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 12:24 AM   #54
saskflames69
#1 Goaltender
 
saskflames69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

As long as their sports production crew is brought along over to Rogers I couldn't care less about the CBC's future.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
If ever there was an oilering
Connor Zary will win the Hart Trophy in 2027.
saskflames69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 12:34 AM   #55
BigTuna
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Feel bad for the people that lost their jobs but this was a long time coming. Anyone that thinks the CBC does a good job on sports obviously never watched the CFL on CBC which was of RSN quality. There's a reason CFL popularity took off when TSN started covering it and it's because CBC did a horrendous job with it. They did do a good job on Olympics and HNIC was okay but had degraded over the years due to the addition of annoying personalities such as Healey, Stock, etc and extreme focus on the Leafs.

Bitter sweet as the worst sports network in North America now owns HNIC but it's the sign of the times that sports broadcasting is big $$$ and a public funded station can't nor should it be able compete with taxpayer money against private broadcasters for the rights to broadcast professional sports.
The only reason they kept afloat all these years. The Leafs pay the bills.
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 12:39 AM   #56
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

I don't understand the point of having HNIC on CBC from CBC's perspective. From what I have heard the programing is being done by Rogers and Rogers gets all the ad money, what does the CBC get out of the deal? From a business perspective it seems silly but maybe they are just being used as a public service to get hockey into more homes on a Saturday night?

The only benefit to CBC I can think of is that the ratings for any of their late Saturday/early Sunday programming will be increased due to drunks leaving their TV on. Wouldn't the CBC be better off showing Simpsons repeats on Saturday nights and collecting their own ad revenue?
FireGilbert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 12:42 AM   #57
shogged
First Line Centre
 
shogged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

end of an era
shogged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 01:29 AM   #58
cal_guy
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert View Post
I don't understand the point of having HNIC on CBC from CBC's perspective. From what I have heard the programing is being done by Rogers and Rogers gets all the ad money, what does the CBC get out of the deal? From a business perspective it seems silly but maybe they are just being used as a public service to get hockey into more homes on a Saturday night?

The only benefit to CBC I can think of is that the ratings for any of their late Saturday/early Sunday programming will be increased due to drunks leaving their TV on. Wouldn't the CBC be better off showing Simpsons repeats on Saturday nights and collecting their own ad revenue?
CBC gets adtime including on the Rogers networks that they can use to advertise their programs.
cal_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 08:33 AM   #59
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTuna View Post
The only reason they kept afloat all these years. The Leafs pay the bills.
I could have sworn taxpayers were footing the money for the bills. HNIC was pretty successful in the 80's when Ballard's Leafs were but a footnote and the Flames were bombing them 8-1. The thing is that the could televise every Saturday Night Leafs game and still get the same amount of viewers and advertising dollars but they went a step further in making every Coaches Corner into "Cherry, Ron, and the Leafs". Leafs this, Leafs that. They went way overboard and like I said I feel bad for the regular people that will lose their jobs but I don't feel sorry for HNIC or CBC at all as they turned a national program into a Toronto program and destroyed it in the process.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 04-11-2014 at 08:36 AM.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2014, 08:35 AM   #60
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I could have sworn taxpayers were footing the money for the bills. HNIC was pretty successful in the 80's when Ballard's Leafs were but a footnote and the Flames were bombing them 8-1. The thing is that the could televise every Saturday Night Leafs game and still get the same amount of viewers and advertising dollars but they went a step further in making every Coaches Corner into "Cherry, Ron, and the Leafs". Leafs this, Leafs that. They went way overboard and like I said I feel bad for the regular people that will lose their jobs but I don't feel sorry for HNIC or CBC at all.
You swear wrong.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy