06-29-2013, 11:09 AM
|
#41
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Gaudreau, Brodie, Sven and #6 are off limits for me.
I'd have to pass unless they accept table scraps.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:09 AM
|
#42
|
|
Franchise Player
|
There is an element of salary dump here too. Boston needs space. Someone has to go because of chia s generosity last off season.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:09 AM
|
#43
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wronskian
I don't see why not, Colorado dealt with us and what we did to Colorado was arguably worse than what we did to Boston.
|
Technically it was Iginla who scorned Boston.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:10 AM
|
#44
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Seguin has a modified NTC, and considering that a guy like this is something every team would be interested in, I don't see him picking the Flames.
I also don't how we could afford him. We are already short on anything of value.
|
His no trade clause wouldn't kick in until July 5th.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:10 AM
|
#45
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
It would be a mistake for the Bruins to give up on Seguin, a bad year at 21 is not worth walking away from his potential. On the other hand, the last time they traded a young star they got Seguin, Hamilton, and Knight in return...
Milt
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:10 AM
|
#46
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Seguin >> 6th overall... Please don't be silly... You draft a player at 6 at pray he develops like Seguin has been.
6th + Glencross + small piece
For
Seguin + prospect/pick (3rd round or equivalent)
That's a screaming deal for CGY... Likely need to add a bit more, like taking on a bad contract...I still say Feaster should do it if BOS goes for it
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:10 AM
|
#47
|
|
Franchise Player
|
So I think actual price to land seguin or another roster player will be lower.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:11 AM
|
#48
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
At #6 I think we'd be hoping to draft a Seguin quality player. So these deals that significantly more than the #6 doesn't make much sense for us.
|
Yeah, that's my thinking as well. I think a guy like Monahan/Lindholm might be pretty close to what Seguin gives you anyway... not sure why we need to give up half our assets just to make up that gap. Yes, a prospect is still just a prospect, but Seguin hasn't really hit his potential yet either, so he's no sure thing either.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:11 AM
|
#49
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius
Seguin >> 6th overall... Please don't be silly... You draft a player at 6 at pray he develops like Seguin has been.
6th + Glencross + small piece
For
Seguin + prospect/pick (3rd round or equivalent)
That's a screaming deal for CGY... Likely need to add a bit more, like taking on a bad contract...I still say Feaster should do it if BOS goes for it
|
This is a significant overpayment, coming from a poster with a well laid track record for not thinking Calgary has particularly valuable assets.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:12 AM
|
#50
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I'd offer Gaudreau + #22 + #28
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
Azure,
dammage79,
Flames_F.T.W,
Flash Walken,
Flickered Flame,
Francis's Hairpiece,
Jack,
Jiggy_12,
MrMike,
pappa jan,
RT14,
Rubicant,
Table 5
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:13 AM
|
#51
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'd offer Gaudreau + #22 + #28
|
That seems about right from our perspective. Who knows what Boston is looking for...but I would hope that would get it done.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:13 AM
|
#52
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
This is a significant overpayment, coming from a poster with a well laid track record for not thinking Calgary has particularly valuable assets.
|
That's underpayment, not overpayment.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:14 AM
|
#53
|
|
Franchise Player
|
huge overpayments in this thread
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:15 AM
|
#54
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
At #6 I think we'd be hoping to draft a Seguin quality player. So these proposals that offer significantly more than the #6 doesn't make much sense for us IMO
|
Out of thanks but agree 100%
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:16 AM
|
#55
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
That's the thing you definitely don't do. This team will be a bottom feeder and that draft pick may be #1 overall. Just no.
I like Tyler Seguin, but I think some people here are over valuing the guy a bit. You can't just throw all your prospects/picks out the window for one guy. He's not Crosby.
|
Mah, 21 year old right handed center. If it limited the immediate return for the Flames I think you do it. You're not Mortgaging the future by selling next years first for Seguin. It's worth it IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:16 AM
|
#56
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'd offer Gaudreau + #22 + #28
|
That package is considerably worse than the one the Av's turned down for 1st overall. I highly doubt Boston would bite for a similar player being acquired.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:16 AM
|
#57
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'd offer Gaudreau + #22 + #28
|
Why not add in Hanowski or Agostino? Then you've got the Iggy trade that helped get Seguin, so the chain of getting new franchise players for our old franchise players continues.
__________________
Born to lose live to win
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:18 AM
|
#58
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
That package is considerably worse than the one the Av's turned down for 1st overall. I highly doubt Boston would bite for a similar player being acquired.
|
I would much rather have MacKinnon
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:19 AM
|
#59
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I would much rather have MacKinnon
|
I think we all would. My point is replacing our #6 with Gaudreu aint going to get it done for Seguin either..
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2013, 11:20 AM
|
#60
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I't not about the value, as I think 6+ for Seguin is reasonable, it's the fact that we're poor as hell when it comes to being able to pay the value. If we were deeper in the prospect pool, this might be an option ... but we just don't have enough in place. If there's a way to do it with the two other firsts plus Glencross, you do it for sure.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.
|
|
