Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2013, 01:44 PM   #41
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Here's a question for you, Valo: How were they able to file this suit in Cook County, given none of the parties seems to be tied there? We have a Canadian player who lived in Minnesota and then New York, the league is incorporated in New York, the Rangers are based out of New York and the Wild out of Minnesota. Unless there is a party I'm missing here, this just seems like shopping for a 'friendly' jurisdiction. How is that allowed?
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 01:50 PM   #42
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Not only is he gone, but the mods disappeared him entirely!

We'll be good, Photon. We promise!

CP thread going sideways



Photon
Zevo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zevo For This Useful Post:
Old 05-13-2013, 02:01 PM   #43
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Here's a question for you, Valo: How were they able to file this suit in Cook County, given none of the parties seems to be tied there? We have a Canadian player who lived in Minnesota and then New York, the league is incorporated in New York, the Rangers are based out of New York and the Wild out of Minnesota. Unless there is a party I'm missing here, this just seems like shopping for a 'friendly' jurisdiction. How is that allowed?
I've been asking myself the same question. The only thing I can come up with is that the NHL has opened itself up to being brought into court in Illinois by operating a franchise within the state. I'm not at all familiar with Illinois civil procedure so that's really nothing more than a guess.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 02:03 PM   #44
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

For those questioning the possibility of a team doctor acting in a very questionable manner here's an example to show that it's not exactly unprecedented.

http://deadspin.com/the-chargers-doc...they-466685771
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 02:06 PM   #45
Jake
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
The doctors were acting as employees of the NHL. Employers are responsible for the actions of their employees.
Fair enough, but the doctors themselves should still be independently disciplined by their professional organization if they are found to be at fault.
Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 02:08 PM   #46
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake View Post
Fair enough, but the doctors themselves should still be independently disciplined by their professional organization if they are found to be at fault.
And they almost always are
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 02:14 PM   #47
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I've been asking myself the same question. The only thing I can come up with is that the NHL has opened itself up to being brought into court in Illinois by operating a franchise within the state. I'm not at all familiar with Illinois civil procedure so that's really nothing more than a guess.
Forget long arm statutes, would this be an Inspector Gadget statute?

BTW, after reading much of the documentation about the Prenda Law case, especially Judge Wright's Star Trek themed sanction order, I will be most disappointed if the lawyers and judges in this case aren't as interesting!
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 04:14 PM   #48
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

No disrespect to him but he was a no talent hockey player whose only skill was what they are complaining caused his injuries. I think he took on a high risk job and got compensated adequately for it.

BS lawsuit
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:13 PM   #49
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I've been asking myself the same question. The only thing I can come up with is that the NHL has opened itself up to being brought into court in Illinois by operating a franchise within the state. I'm not at all familiar with Illinois civil procedure so that's really nothing more than a guess.
That doesn't make a great deal of sense to me. Under that theory, one could sue McDonalds from virtually any jurisdiction in the US.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 09:35 PM   #50
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

No one told him to drink alcohol with the medications for the pain involved in the profession he chose. It's not the NHL's fault at all
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 10:08 PM   #51
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

No one put a gun to his head to play hockey, with all of the repercussions that come with it. I wonder if his family asked/advised him to stop playing?

I feel this is one of those no blame situations...it's a societal issue, and launching suits isn't going to do anything to improve the way these problems are resolved in the future, and may actually make them worse. Instead, why not focus efforts towards improving awareness of mental health/addiction issues related to the workplace (these issues extend well beyond pro hockey players) and access to programs.

This also brings to mind Paul Ranger - a great example of getting out when necessary and taking care of personal issues.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 10:56 PM   #52
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
How were they able to file this suit in Cook County, given none of the parties seems to be tied there? We have a Canadian player who lived in Minnesota and then New York, the league is incorporated in New York, the Rangers are based out of New York and the Wild out of Minnesota. Unless there is a party I'm missing here, this just seems like shopping for a 'friendly' jurisdiction. How is that allowed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I've been asking myself the same question. The only thing I can come up with is that the NHL has opened itself up to being brought into court in Illinois by operating a franchise within the state. I'm not at all familiar with Illinois civil procedure so that's really nothing more than a guess.
They are allowed to file anywhere but that doesn't mean the venue is proper. I think it's just a case of a Chicago law firm handling this case and they needed to file before the statute of limitations runs out in states like New York. Filing in Illinois tolls the statute of limitations. The Boogaard's lawyers or more likely the NHL can request for a change of venue. I don't think the fact that NHL operates a franchise in Chicago is relevant here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
That doesn't make a great deal of sense to me. Under that theory, one could sue McDonalds from virtually any jurisdiction in the US.
One can indeed sue McDonalds from any jurisdiction in the US, but if the cause of action arose in Illinois and the company is headquartered in Illinois (as is the case for McDonalds), the case will unlikely be heard in say Washington State.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FAN For This Useful Post:
Old 05-13-2013, 10:58 PM   #53
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Coincidence or not, the Boogaard's case against the NHLPA was dismissed recently. Then this suit happened. You also got to ask why Boogaard's estate isn't suing Derek's brother who allegedly supplied Derek with illegal drugs.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 07:39 AM   #54
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
That doesn't make a great deal of sense to me. Under that theory, one could sue McDonalds from virtually any jurisdiction in the US.
One likely could sure McDonald's in virtually any jurisdiction in the country.

Here's the Illinois long arm statute:

http://www.kentlaw.edu/perritt/cours...g-arm-stat.htm

Of note:

Quote:
Act submitting to jurisdiction--Process. (a) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this State, who in person or through an agent does any of the acts hereinafter enumerated, thereby submits such person, and, if an individual, his or her personal representative, to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State as to any cause of action arising from the doing of any of such acts:

(1) The transaction of any business within this State;
Quote:
(4) Contracting to insure any person, property or risk located within this State at the time of contracting;
Quote:
(7) The making or performance of any contract or promise substantially connected with this State;
It's pretty easy to see how the NHL is subject to Illinois jurisdiction based upon that.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 10:26 AM   #55
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

With 12 different doctors prescribing things in 1 season and his family admitting he was also getting pills illegally, this just looks like any other addict out seeking pills.

Let's be honest if Boogard wasn't making 7 figures everyone would have been calling him a junkie.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 12:23 PM   #56
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Bump:

The Juicing of Derek Boogaard: Just read this guy's twitter feed, sad.

https://twitter.com/TravisHeHateMe/s...01780705087488



And a blog post:

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?p...2#.UfayoI2R98F
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 12:25 PM   #57
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

NM can't embed tweets

Travis Yost @TravisHeHateMe

In eight days, Derek Boogaard chewed through sixty Hydrocodone (500 mg) and thirty Vicodin (?). Got re-upped for another thirty next day.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 12:30 PM   #58
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default

Is Godard an accomplice then?

__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2013, 08:23 PM   #59
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Holy crap. He makes Dr. House look like a rookie.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2013, 11:44 PM   #60
flamesfan1297
First Line Centre
 
flamesfan1297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
Exp:
Default

it was a tragic death and is a tragic story. does anyone know how much they are suing for ?
flamesfan1297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy