Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2012, 10:55 PM   #41
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate View Post
https://www.cfi-icaf.ca/index.php?op...rces&Itemid=31



Do you think that 30% of those that are for owning guns would be FOR shooting deer, but AGAINST shooting skunks? I think people love deer more than skunks.
Well I also posted before you went back and said maybe you should have said populated instead of residential (or whatever the clarification was) so I was a bit confused on what you exactly meant too.

I think most (or at least a slim majority) of those people, gun owners or not, would be against shooting something for no reason. It shouldn't matter if its a skunk, or a moose, or a polar bear. A fair hunt is one thing, just shooting things for the sake of killing them is quite another.

I don't even like it when people shoot at gophers. Now I know I'm on the left end of that stance, and I also know some land owners have to, but I think it's wasteful and immoral to kill anything when you don't have to. And as someone mentioned, shooting the skunk is probably going to cause as much stink as if he sprayed anyway. Just leave the poor thing alone.

I actually did know a land owner that had to control the marmot population on his land, and he didn't feel great about shooting them either. I know some people really get off on it, but I would guess it's not as high as the amount of people that think it's ok to own a firearm. I know a lot of people who like to own a gun but don't want to kill stuff.

So yeah, I think that the whole shooting at something in the dark, that may or may not be a live animal (or child) is pretty silly and most people would be against it. I think most people would be against discharging a firearm in a residential or populated area, and I think most people would be against shooting animals outside of a fair hunt. These were the original points behind the argument. Do I think most Canadians are for responsible gun ownership? Of course. But so much about this story isn't responsible and even the first way you framed the question was confusing.

I'm pretty sure most Canadians would be against discharging a firearm even at a supposed skunk if there is even 1% there might be children in the area, or the person might miss, or they were in a residential area of some sort. Again it's the difference between responsible gun use, and reckless gun use. Which a lot of Americans don't seem to know the difference between. Even their laws reflect this.

Last edited by Daradon; 10-23-2012 at 11:02 PM.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daradon For This Useful Post:
T@T
Old 10-23-2012, 10:57 PM   #42
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Guns don't kill skunks. People kill skunks.
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy