I think everyone would love to see a perfect energy source that doesn't have risks, doesn't impact anything or anyone, and is free. We don't live in that world though. I think everyone would love to see all energy from renewable sources too, but if it was that easy it'd already be well under way.
Germany will be interesting to watch to see if they can actually follow through with what they want and how they do it, but I'm skeptical simply because solar/wind/etc are great, but scaling them up is a serious challenge while existing nuclear is well known, and there are other technologies for nuclear that haven't been explored yet that could mitigate a lot of the risks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BerubeHater
Photon, I am curious what your background is with this kind of stuff? It seems you are pretty knowledgable in this area.
I would have thought this story would have been bigger news than it is right now, but might not be because of some of the things you have mentioned.
|
I don't have any background in this, other than just a general scientific interest. I just read a lot and participate in other forums where there are people in and around the industry who know a lot more about it than me.
News is big events, and "the risk is serious today, just like it was yesterday and the last 365 days" doesn't make for good news.
But finding a guy who works for an organization with a stated agenda that can generate a scary phrase sometimes makes news.
I don't doubt some people have tried to downplay the severity of the situation, just like others try to blow it all out of proportion (one thing I read said that one MOX fuel rod could kill 2.89 billion people.. which is true, if you ground the rod into a fine powder and split the powder into 2.89 billion 80microgram doses and had each person inhale it).
I just try to base my reactions on reason rather than some website that sees a tiny fluctuation in background radiation and decides that means we're all going to die.