For the record, just asked my GF sitting next to me, and she said she won't blow uncut guys. Says it sometimes it smells funny, and she had a bad experience with some dick cheese once.
And she is a bit slutty. So there you go.
so....
/thread, debate over.
Finally the Jews and Muslims can agree on something.
Most organs that are removed are only done so when medically required. We can live without an appendix but that doesn't mean we remove everyone's appendix before it becomes a problem.
I believe the reason why people need to get their wisdom teeth removed is because dental hygiene is so much better now than throughout the vast majority of human existence. In previous generations, it was rare for people to reach adulthood with all 32 teeth in their mouths, so the wisdom teeth would come in and push the other teeth forward to fill in the gaps. Now, because we keep our teeth in good shape, the wisdom teeth don't have anywhere to go, so they cause problems when they come in and need to be removed.
The foreskin basically plays the same role for the head of the penis that the eyelid provides for the eyeball. You could probably live without an eyelid, but you certainly wouldn't volunteer to have yours removed for no good reason.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
You may have answered your own question, A doc buddy told me he thinks it's the natural evolution of humans that organs like the appendix and gall bladder are failing and need removal. He said allready there are few case of babys be born without an appendix and he thinks in a few thousand years all kids will be born without the useless organs.
I'll have to ask him about the forskin...problem is,he was born and raised a Jew
Does your buddy think a noticeably disproportionate amount of people with an appendix/gall bladder die before procreation? It really doesn't make a difference in the modern world.
Also, just because you can live without something, doesn't mean its useless. The appendix likely has a role in developing childhood immunity, and the gall bladder helps alot with digestion of fatty foods. You can live without legs/eyes/etc, but that doesn't make them useless....
So, what you guys are saying is that you've been told by women that they prefer men who are the same way you are? Shocking. I bet they also say that you're the perfect size too.
Was talking to my buddy's girl, guess he's an anteater. She for some reason was talking about it and said it kinda creeps her out, I guess lint gets caught in there sometimes or something. More than I ever cared to know about his hammer anyway.
Seeing as they've been together on-and-off since '01, it can't be bothering her that much though...
Does your buddy think a noticeably disproportionate amount of people with an appendix/gall bladder die before procreation? It really doesn't make a difference in the modern world.
Also, just because you can live without something, doesn't mean its useless. The appendix likely has a role in developing childhood immunity, and the gall bladder helps alot with digestion of fatty foods. You can live without legs/eyes/etc, but that doesn't make them useless....
I'm no doc but according to him the appendix isn't used at all anymore as it original use was for primitive man to be able to eat a lot of leaves (something to that effect anyway) he did say that some scientists think it has a use in a growing fetus to help the immune system but he doesn't really buy it as the kids that have been born without the organ have been healthy..(I'll ask about the unborn)
As far as the gall-bladder goes. From what I was told if you eat the amount of fat it takes for that thing to work you probably won't see the age of 50. The reason gall stones form is because the enzymes lay dormant in the organ,modern humans don't eat that enough of raw fat to get it working.
I have yet to be in a situation where foreskin was a deal breaker. Once a girl gets to that point it's not going to matter. As for it being dirtier I call shinanigans I know that I keep it clean under the hood and if someone doesn't then they are just a greaseball period.
The Following User Says Thank You to Gundo For This Useful Post:
"There is evidence that circumcision results in a reduction in the incidence of penile cancer and of HIV transmission. However, there is inadequate information to recommend circumcision as a public health measure to prevent these diseases."
There is a whole section that is to long to post that states some studies show a correlation and some do not. There is also some concern upon review that the studies that did show a correlation may have overestimated the correlation.
I'm not saying that there isn't a correlation but it's not a great argument when there are alternative options available that will increase protection from STD's very near to 100%.
I'm not arguing against circumcision either, it's a choice, but it should be an informed one.
You know what's an even better option than taking a knife to your penis? Not having sex with people who have STDs.
You know what's an even better option than taking a knife to your penis? Not having sex with people who have STDs.
I'm assuming you give every sexual partner you've ever had a full STD test followed by a waiting period of a month to account for any still developing diseases that have not shown up on that test.
Then there's the STDs you can't actually test for.
Whether or not a circumcision is valuble is one thing, but "not having sex with people who have STDs" is no really possible. You have no idea where that person has been before you.
Women will prefer what they are used to. Growing up in Europe I never even thought being uncut was an issue. Then moving to North America while being high school age was a big shock when some ladies acted like they saw something they've never seen before.
The Following User Says Thank You to taco.vidal For This Useful Post:
I'm no doc but according to him the appendix isn't used at all anymore as it original use was for primitive man to be able to eat a lot of leaves (something to that effect anyway) he did say that some scientists think it has a use in a growing fetus to help the immune system but he doesn't really buy it as the kids that have been born without the organ have been healthy..(I'll ask about the unborn)
As far as the gall-bladder goes. From what I was told if you eat the amount of fat it takes for that thing to work you probably won't see the age of 50. The reason gall stones form is because the enzymes lay dormant in the organ,modern humans don't eat that enough of raw fat to get it working.
The problem with your friends logic is that it's impossible to know who in the healthy has/hasn't an appendix without surgical exploration. You can't make such a broad generalization without knowing your denominators.
He's also wrong about the gall bladder, as it pretty much empties every time you eat something in modern era. Yes, gall stones generally form from stasis, but repeated 'down times' between meals X 40 years does the cumulative trick. We also know that people with a removed gall bladder live fine, but there's a reason why a good number of them end up with chronic diarrhea.
Anyways back on track - Is any of this applicable to foreskin? The western medical community is divided, as you can find articles supporting both sides. The general medical recommendations also flip back and forth every decade or so, depending on who's got the 'biggest dick' at consensus meetings.
I'm assuming you give every sexual partner you've ever had a full STD test followed by a waiting period of a month to account for any still developing diseases that have not shown up on that test.
Then there's the STDs you can't actually test for.
Whether or not a circumcision is valuble is one thing, but "not having sex with people who have STDs" is no really possible. You have no idea where that person has been before you.
Where a rubber dude. Cut ot uncut, we're all covered the same. I don't get your logic. I won't sleep with any girl without a dome. I am actually more worried about knocking her up then getting an STD.
Killing two birds with one stone pregnancy and STDs.
Women will prefer what they are used to. Growing up in Europe I never even thought being uncut was an issue. Then moving to North America while being high school age was a big shock when some ladies acted like they saw something they've never seen before.
HAHA so true. I was born in Europe too. It did work to an advantage at times though because some of the girls where curious to give it a whirl. I think they though it would feel different for them or to just say they did a guy who was uncut.
Women will prefer what they are used to. Growing up in Europe I never even thought being uncut was an issue. Then moving to North America while being high school age was a big shock when some ladies acted like they saw something they've never seen before.
This. When I was a lad being cut was quite normal, whereas for my son I imagine that will switch and the anteaters will dominate. Interesting to see if female opinions change. It would make sense that the women we know prefer cut as they probably see it the most.
Secondly, can somebody please explain the "I didn't want my son to look different than me" argument? Did other guys spend a lot more time analyzing their dad's unit than I did? I can only recall seeing my dad's once or twice. We are both cut, and it still looks pretty g-damn different when you're just a little kid. I anticipate the question arising at some point, and I imagine it will unfold something like:
"why does yours look different than mine?"
"some boys look like yours, and some look like mine"
"ok"
I legitimately don't see it happening a whole lot differently than that. More than STD's or hygiene I hear that looking similar to dad as the main reason. Explanation?
