Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What will happen to Brad Treliving after the end of the season?
He should and will be fired 167 17.06%
He should be fired, but will continue as the Flames GM 277 28.29%
He should not and will not be fired 288 29.42%
He should not but will be fired 27 2.76%
Unsure if he should be, but he will be fired 37 3.78%
Unsure if he should be, but he will not be fired 183 18.69%
Voters: 979. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2021, 02:49 PM   #561
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Will our head of scouting survive another regime change or can we start comparing our success to other teams in the league as opposed to old versions of the Flames?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 02:53 PM   #562
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Will our head of scouting survive another regime change or can we start comparing our success to other teams in the league as opposed to old versions of the Flames?
Tod Button has photos of someone doing something they shouldn’t.

Drafts have been decent, but nothing to write home about. Nothing that anyone else couldn’t have done if they’d spent six weeks poring over the FC draft guide.

In fact, that actually explains the entire McDonald/Andersson/Kylington 2nd round.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2021, 02:54 PM   #563
Inglewood Jack
#1 Goaltender
 
Inglewood Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Exp:
Default

The bust UFA signings like Brouwer and Neal are the highest visibility mistakes, but the constant rotating cast of replacement level bottom roster skaters has been just as damaging in my opinion, through expenditure of middle draft picks and denial of prospect development.
Inglewood Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 02:59 PM   #564
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Will our head of scouting survive another regime change or can we start comparing our success to other teams in the league as opposed to old versions of the Flames?
I’d credit Feaster with changing that from what Darryl says to a scouting team. since then seems to me the flames scouting has gotten better as years passed and is now pretty solid.

Maybe just me.
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bend it like Bourgeois For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2021, 03:08 PM   #565
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
I’d credit Feaster with changing that from what Darryl says to a scouting team. since then seems to me the flames scouting has gotten better as years passed and is now pretty solid.

Maybe just me.
I think they function as a competent scouting department. But who have they turned up since Gaudreau in the 4th round a decade ago? (Jesus)

Mangiapane is the only noteworthy player obtained outside the top 2 rounds.

None of the college free agents have become anything. Here or elsewhere.

Every single goalie drafted by this team has been a debacle at the NHL level. For over two decades. The only guy who managed to escape the cursed touch of being drafted by this organization as a netminder is Craig Anderson.

Yeah. New scouting department. Add that to the list.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:26 PM   #566
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Will our head of scouting survive another regime change or can we start comparing our success to other teams in the league as opposed to old versions of the Flames?
Drafts are always hard to evaluate because the most recent ones are not yet long enough to really assess.
But I think, for the quality and number of picks, the scouts have had the team has done a really good job.

BT's first real draft was 2015. He didn't have a big say in 2014, and it's unclear how much influence Burke had. But let's include it

2014
NHLers: 1 (Bennett)
Overall score: BAD

2015:
NHLers: 2.5 (Rasmus, Eat Bread, Kylington)
Overall score: GREAT for not having a 1st round pick they got two NHl players playing up in the lineup.

2016
NHLers: 3 including 2 stars (Tkachuk and Fox)
Potential prospects: 2 or 3 (Parsons, Tuulola, Philips)
Overall score: GREAT (on the backs of the Fox and Dube picks)

2017
NHLers: 1 (Juuso Valimaki)
Potential prospects: 1 (Ruzicka)
Overall score: Too early to tell. Will depend on how Juuso does but he's looking good

2018
NHLers: 0
Potential prospects: 3 (Pospisil, Pettersen, Little Z)
Overall score: Too early to tell but Pettersen and Little Z are trending well above where they were drafted

2019
NHLes: 0
Potential prospects: 3 (Pelletier, Nikolaev, Wolf)
Overall score: Too early to tell. Wolf seems like a great selection at 214

2020 way too early to tell.


I think they've done well absent a lot of high picks or quantity of picks. THN typically does a report every year on draft performance normalized for picks but I can't find it now.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:28 PM   #567
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
I think they function as a competent scouting department. But who have they turned up since Gaudreau in the 4th round a decade ago? (Jesus)

Mangiapane is the only noteworthy player obtained outside the top 2 rounds.

None of the college free agents have become anything. Here or elsewhere.

Every single goalie drafted by this team has been a debacle at the NHL level. For over two decades. The only guy who managed to escape the cursed touch of being drafted by this organization as a netminder is Craig Anderson.

Yeah. New scouting department. Add that to the list.
Magnianpane
Fox
Andersson at #53 is a great pick. 2nd round picks are far from a slam dunk.
Dube also is looking like a good pick.
Kulak at 105 is good

And they've drafted guys late who are trending well above their draft position: Pettersen, Zavgorodniy, Tuulola, Wolf.

yes every team has prospects like that, but there's some good early signs there.

Under the current regime I think drafting has been way better.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2021, 03:31 PM   #568
chedder
Franchise Player
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Isn't it a bad thing that we have no nhl players drafted from 2018 on playing in the league? I know we have given away picks, which is part of the problem.

Good teams have young players playing these days it seems.

And why is Fox considered a good pick? I thought it was pretty well known at the time he had no intention of signing here.
chedder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:43 PM   #569
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
Isn't it a bad thing that we have no nhl players drafted from 2018 on playing in the league? I know we have given away picks, which is part of the problem.

Good teams have young players playing these days it seems.

And why is Fox considered a good pick? I thought it was pretty well known at the time he had no intention of signing here.
Fox is a good pick because he’s a good player at the NHL level.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:45 PM   #570
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

And was used to acquire young and top of the lineup players.
That 3rd round was well used. No question.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:47 PM   #571
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
Isn't it a bad thing that we have no nhl players drafted from 2018 on playing in the league? I know we have given away picks, which is part of the problem.

Good teams have young players playing these days it seems.

And why is Fox considered a good pick? I thought it was pretty well known at the time he had no intention of signing here.
2018? Hardly any players outside the studs have played meaningful games. No one outside the first round has played over 20. And TB, Boston, Washington, Vegas, none have any 2018 draft picks on the roster.

I don’t know what intel they had on Fox at the draft but whatever they knew, they parlayed him into the deal for Lindholm and Hanifin so that’s something.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:47 PM   #572
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
Isn't it a bad thing that we have no nhl players drafted from 2018 on playing in the league? I know we have given away picks, which is part of the problem.

Good teams have young players playing these days it seems.

And why is Fox considered a good pick? I thought it was pretty well known at the time he had no intention of signing here.
Whoa whoa . You mean the point of drafting is to develop quality NHlers

How many 20 goals scorers has this team drafted in the last 5 years ? Not stars . 20 goal scorers

How many starting goalies has this team drafted in the past decade ?

Our farm system is ranked around 20th, and while we have promoted some nice quality pieces recently , we don’t ever hit on goalies - causing us to waste tons of picks and then have to pay for a elite FA, and we can’t develop forwards to save our lifes

We can’t even fill out a 4th line and 3rd D pairings with cheap energetic youth. Instead we keep trading picks (part of the problem) and signing players to fill out these spots

Just another one of this teams many problems

Anyone who thinking we are anywhere except bottom 1/3 in drafting is delusional
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:49 PM   #573
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
Isn't it a bad thing that we have no nhl players drafted from 2018 on playing in the league? I know we have given away picks, which is part of the problem.

Good teams have young players playing these days it seems.

And why is Fox considered a good pick? I thought it was pretty well known at the time he had no intention of signing here.
In 2018 the Flames first pick was in the 4th round. From the 4th on in that draft there have been 3 players play in the NHL totaling 45 games. Problem here isn't bad picking it's lack of picks.

In 2019 the Flames picked 26th. After that selection there have been 3 players play in NHL games. Two with 1 game each and one (Hoglander) with 24 games. Great pick. But that's it.

There have been 2 players (#1 and #3) play in the from the 2020 draft.

So across those 3 drafts there are 8 players in total that have played a single game or more who were selected after the Flames earliest pick.

So nope - the lack of NHL players from those drafts isn't a sign of a problem at all.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:50 PM   #574
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Anyone who thinking we are anywhere except bottom 1/3 in drafting is delusional
Not when normalized for picks and quality of picks. On that basis I would say the Flames are top third or top half over the last 5 years.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 03:59 PM   #575
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Whoa whoa . You mean the point of drafting is to develop quality NHlers

How many 20 goals scorers has this team drafted in the last 5 years ? Not stars . 20 goal scorers

How many starting goalies has this team drafted in the past decade ?

Our farm system is ranked around 20th, and while we have promoted some nice quality pieces recently , we don’t ever hit on goalies - causing us to waste tons of picks and then have to pay for a elite FA, and we can’t develop forwards to save our lifes

We can’t even fill out a 4th line and 3rd D pairings with cheap energetic youth. Instead we keep trading picks (part of the problem) and signing players to fill out these spots

Just another one of this teams many problems

Anyone who thinking we are anywhere except bottom 1/3 in drafting is delusional
In the last 5 years? So only since the Matthew Tkachuk draft in 2016?

You realize that hardly anyone has any players from 2018 onward - that’s Brady Tkachuk’s year and he and Svechnikov are the only 20 goal guys. Then 2017 there’s Petterson and Hischier (and he only did it in his rookie year and not since). So 2016, Calgary drafted Tkachuk who is one of 6 20 goal scorers (the others are Matthews, Keller, Laine, PLD, and Debrincat. Keller’s only done it once, as a rookie.

So Calgary has drafted as many 20 goal scorers as 9 other teams and more than the rest in the last 5 years.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2021, 05:40 PM   #576
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
In the last 5 years? So only since the Matthew Tkachuk draft in 2016?

You realize that hardly anyone has any players from 2018 onward - that’s Brady Tkachuk’s year and he and Svechnikov are the only 20 goal guys. Then 2017 there’s Petterson and Hischier (and he only did it in his rookie year and not since). So 2016, Calgary drafted Tkachuk who is one of 6 20 goal scorers (the others are Matthews, Keller, Laine, PLD, and Debrincat. Keller’s only done it once, as a rookie.

So Calgary has drafted as many 20 goal scorers as 9 other teams and more than the rest in the last 5 years.
I will admit I assumed there were more!

However, I stand by my premise (Even though my evidence was poor! Appreciate the correction)

We suck and have sucked at drafting for the last 20 years. This is why the team is always getting into the same cycle.

Waste picks to fill out depth. Have less picks so less chances at good players which contributes to poor drafting/player pipeline, so then overpay for depth FA's. Watch team wallow in mediocracy.

The fact that we got a undrafted Norris Trophy winner and a 4th round star and still cant win a playoff round shows how god awful our drafting and player development is.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 05:57 PM   #577
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inglewood Jack View Post
The bust UFA signings like Brouwer and Neal are the highest visibility mistakes, but the constant rotating cast of replacement level bottom roster skaters has been just as damaging in my opinion, through expenditure of middle draft picks and denial of prospect development.

Need BIG fast guys on the 4th line so they can do some damage. We seem to keep adding pieces that don't really fit. Someone in the office is not doing their job very well!
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 06:06 PM   #578
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DazzlinDino View Post
Need BIG fast guys on the 4th line so they can do some damage. We seem to keep adding pieces that don't really fit. Someone in the office is not doing their job very well!
We really just need good hockey players in the bottom six.

For Treliving's entire tenure here, he has seemingly focused on deploying nothing but bad hockey players in the bottom six. It has been, and still is a bold strategy.

Last edited by ComixZone; 02-26-2021 at 06:18 PM.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 06:16 PM   #579
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
We really just need good hockey players in the bottom six.

For Treliving's entire tenure here, he has seemingly focused on deploying nothing but bad hockey players. It has been, and still is a bold strategy.

Those bad players brought handcuffs! We have never really recovered from those moves!
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2021, 06:18 PM   #580
Jeff Lebowski
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Drafts are always hard to evaluate because the most recent ones are not yet long enough to really assess.
But I think, for the quality and number of picks, the scouts have had the team has done a really good job.

BT's first real draft was 2015. He didn't have a big say in 2014, and it's unclear how much influence Burke had. But let's include it

2014
NHLers: 1 (Bennett)
Overall score: BAD

2015:
NHLers: 2.5 (Rasmus, Eat Bread, Kylington)
Overall score: GREAT for not having a 1st round pick they got two NHl players playing up in the lineup.

2016
NHLers: 3 including 2 stars (Tkachuk and Fox)
Potential prospects: 2 or 3 (Parsons, Tuulola, Philips)
Overall score: GREAT (on the backs of the Fox and Dube picks)

2017
NHLers: 1 (Juuso Valimaki)
Potential prospects: 1 (Ruzicka)
Overall score: Too early to tell. Will depend on how Juuso does but he's looking good

2018
NHLers: 0
Potential prospects: 3 (Pospisil, Pettersen, Little Z)
Overall score: Too early to tell but Pettersen and Little Z are trending well above where they were drafted

2019
NHLes: 0
Potential prospects: 3 (Pelletier, Nikolaev, Wolf)
Overall score: Too early to tell. Wolf seems like a great selection at 214

2020 way too early to tell.


I think they've done well absent a lot of high picks or quantity of picks. THN typically does a report every year on draft performance normalized for picks but I can't find it now.
Burke had THE say in 2014. Fires Feaster then has amateur scout meeting where he sets attributes big, leaders, character

Go back to post draft interviews with Button on 2014 or any others. He literally says the attributes: Swedish Mattson "big, leader", Hunter Smith. This was all Burke

Feaster was about hockey sense. On Kanzig "we like his brain"

2015, 2016 taking Mangiapane etc "skill" whatever Treliving emphasized
Jeff Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy