Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2017, 10:10 AM   #561
JFK
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
I'm not that familiar with the CBA, so I've never understood why Bennett couldn't have spent time in the AHL. Look at Brayden Schenn (a player of similar pedigree, drafted 5th OA):

Draft year +1: CHL 29 games; AHL 7; NHL 8
Draft year +2: AHL 7 games; NHL 54
Draft year +3: AHL 33 games; NHL 47

So can someone explain why in draft years +2 and +3 Schenn could get AHL seasoning, while Bennett couldn't.
Your numbers and years are a little off I think.

Brayden Schenn was only assigned to the AHL at 19 on a conditioning stint. Was then returned to junior. He didn't play 57 NHL games that year.

Draft year plus 3, 20 years old, Schenn was free and clear to play in the AHL. Bennett had the same option but spent the entire season in the NHL.

That option has now passed due to games played.
JFK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JFK For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2017, 10:17 AM   #562
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Give him a few minutes less but against lesser competition.
But isn't our fourth line (Brouwer line) getting more minutes then the third line (Bennett line)?
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 10:20 AM   #563
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara66 View Post
But isn't our fourth line (Brouwer line) getting more minutes then the third line (Bennett line)?
Because of the PK perhaps? Unsure, don't have TOI in front of me.

I guess the point was to try and manage who he plays against. Fewer minutes but maybe some better looks? Just for a game or two, see how he responds.
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 10:21 AM   #564
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Because of the PK perhaps? Unsure, don't have TOI in front of me.

I guess the point was to try and manage who he plays against. Fewer minutes but maybe some better looks? Just for a game or two, see how he responds.
Third line played a couple more minutes then fourth line last night.... so maybe not a bad idea.

Can the team not send Bennett down to the AHL for conditioning stint?
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 10:39 AM   #565
zuluking
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

With Ferland cementing his spot on the top line and Jagr back from injury, the team now has the luxury to allow Bennett and Jankowski to learn from and build chemistry with Jagr. As seen in numerous clips from earlier practices, Jagr is in wise mentor mode and frankly that is exactly what Bennett needs right now. It would have been great to have maintained this third line from the beginning of the season, but Ferland hadn't translated his game to the top line and they had to shuffle Jagr in there. Time to keep these three together and let it happen...
__________________
zk
zuluking is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zuluking For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2017, 10:57 AM   #566
Pointman
#1 Goaltender
 
Pointman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Haifa, Israel
Exp:
Default

Yup, trading Bennett is unlikely to happen anytime soon, as the organization would like to see the results of Jagr's mentoring. This also makes me wonder whether Treliving would ask Jagr's opinion of Bennett before pulling or not pulling the trigger.
Pointman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 11:02 AM   #567
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Of course the Flames highest pick ever would end up being a bust.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 11:38 AM   #568
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

I think if we put up a pylon in the offensive zone, the pylon would get luckier and have a puck bounce off of it and maybe deflect to a player who scores and the pylon would have more points than Bennett.

It is mind boggling that a player could play 15 games and not even get a lucky assist let alone one he earned.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 11:54 AM   #569
rain_e
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Exp:
Default

Might as well trade Jankowski before his trade value declines further. No points and -1. We don't want it to get any worse.

Last edited by rain_e; 11-08-2017 at 02:37 PM.
rain_e is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rain_e For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2017, 11:59 AM   #570
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I think they need to sit Bennett for a game or two. Not as a punishment but let him get a different perspective and clear his head. Similar to what they did with Johnny a few years ago.
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:00 PM   #571
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
I think they need to sit Bennett for a game or two. Not as a punishment but let him get a different perspective and clear his head. Similar to what they did with Johnny a few years ago.
Why not as punishment? He deserves to sit a few games because he's playing bad. No need to beat around the bush.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:05 PM   #572
vilzeh
First Line Centre
 
vilzeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Haparanda
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rain_e View Post
Might as well trade Jankowski as well before his trade value declines further. No points and -1. We don't want it to get any worse.
Yes because we have the same expectations for Bennett and Jankowski.

Jankowskis expectations are in the top 6 / bottom 9 role for his career, Bennetts expectations are/were in the #1C/2C areas.
vilzeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:06 PM   #573
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara66 View Post
Can the team not send Bennett down to the AHL for conditioning stint?
Because he doesn't need conditioning. he's been playing as a regular and has not been injured. You just cannot just make up this stuff.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:11 PM   #574
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Because he doesn't need conditioning. he's been playing as a regular and has not been injured. You just cannot just make up this stuff.
Lupul? Hossa? I'm pretty sure you can.

Scratch him for a couple games, let him watch from the press box and then send him to do some skating in the AHL.
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:12 PM   #575
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rain_e View Post
Might as well trade Jankowski as well before his trade value declines further. No points and -1. We don't want it to get any worse.
Jankowski has played half the games Bennett has this season, is a rookie and was drafted 21st overall... I'm not sure this is a fair comparison... actually I am sure it's not a fair comparison.
VilleN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:14 PM   #576
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

I know the NHL rejected Grigorenkos AHL stint a few years ago when the Sabres tried to send him down for conditioning.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:14 PM   #577
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
More than 15.

Nino Niederreiter got 1 point in 55 games in his 2nd NHL season.

He'd gotten a consistent 20 goals + per season ever since, and had 57 points last season.

If you were his GM, he'd be "sucking" for some other team. Just like the former Islander GM who dumped him for "sucking".
Yes and the key is that like Nino, Sam may need to move on to have any success at the NHL level. What the Flames are now getting from him is beyond abysmal. A laughable stat line of 17 Shots (17!!!), 16 PIM and 0G, 0A, -5 would be hard for even a face puncher to achieve at this point and those guys don't play 14+ minutes a night.

Look back into the previous season and you have roughly 45 games of the same ineptitude creating a disturbing trend that doesn't appear to be easing.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 11-08-2017 at 12:17 PM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:20 PM   #578
TheFlamesVan
Retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Back in Guelph
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Yes and the key is that like Nino, Sam may need to move on to have any success at the NHL level. What the Flames are now getting from him is beyond abysmal. A laughable stat line of 17 Shots (17!!!), 16 PIM and 0G, 0A, -5 would be hard for even a face puncher to achieve at this point and those guys don't play 14+ minutes a night.

Look back into the previous season and you have roughly 45 games of the same ineptitude creating a disturbing trend that doesn't appear to be easing.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but 17-20 shots on net at this point of the season, for a 3rd line winger with no pp, I believe is pretty average.
TheFlamesVan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:47 PM   #579
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlamesVan View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but 17-20 shots on net at this point of the season, for a 3rd line winger with no pp, I believe is pretty average.
Well, 17-20 shots is 243-284th in shots out of forwards.

So, below average 3rd liner numbers, but in line with his TOI. Of course a good player should be getting chances above his TOI
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2017, 12:47 PM   #580
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Why not as punishment? He deserves to sit a few games because he's playing bad. No need to beat around the bush.
Punishment is old style management. The goal isn't to make Bennett feel worse. The goal is to give him the tools to do what he does best and maybe the organization has not done enough of that. Another way to look at this is, how would Johnny have done playing with the same line-mates on the 3rd line that Bennett had before Jankowski? I bet Johnny would be scoreless for long periods as well. Maybe frustrated especially if he was asked to take on the center role. Maybe the Flames didn't quite handle Bennett the best way or maybe they should have given him more opportunities to focus on what he does best?.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy