Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2022, 01:06 PM   #5181
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default



Re: Toews. He can fit at 50% retained if we ship Dube or equivalent out in the trade.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 01:10 PM   #5182
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
^^ Its really too bad the Flames had so much on the go that Tre couldn't sneak in the deal the Kraken got for Bjorkstrand. That would have solved a ton.
That assumes that the Flames both like the player and were not in on it. I wouldn't assume that they were too busy and that's why it didn't happen.
All things being equal picks from Seattle have more value than picks from the Flames. so they would have had to offer more or better picks.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 01:13 PM   #5183
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
I hear what you're saying, but all three of Necas' seasons so far have exceeded Jarnkrok's career high for pts. But they are definitely similar in the sense that their ability to play C is largely theoretical at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Not comparable. Necas has serious upside, like top 2 C upside.
Like I said, I’m not comparing the players, just the hype on the board for a relatively lesser name. And I bet I could find you some posts saying Jarnkrok was a middle six C which implies 2C upside to me.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 01:13 PM   #5184
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I think he would be, especially if he wants out.
At 50% retention the cost would start at a first round pick.

I expect if he’s traded, it’s a deadline deal, where a 50% retention would seriously drive up his price.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 01:18 PM   #5185
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post


Re: Toews. He can fit at 50% retained if we ship Dube or equivalent out in the trade.
Just no and no and no. If we’re expending assets then spend them on a real Center that can stay for the foreseeable future. I just don’t get this fascination with bringing in has beens at max cost, not to mention moving a dube to do it.

Is teows the difference between winning and losing over a stastny who you can sign for free? I highly doubt it. Could teows go on a magical run? Sure possible? Would I bet a first and dube on it? No today zurg!
Fan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Fan69 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 01:22 PM   #5186
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I wasn't arguing one way or another, I just thought it was interesting that he could be accomodated on the roster. But, more directly to your point, I think it's fairly obvious that Toews >> Stastny, especially considering playoff past. We are only 2 seasons removed from Toews neutering McDavid in the playoffs, for example. I think he's still got more than enough in the tank for a healthy playoff run. Might not be a huge in season add but brings ample talent and gravitas to outweigh that.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 01:26 PM   #5187
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I’m not familiar with Necas at all, and I’m certainly not comparing the players, but all this talk reminds me a lot of how a large chunk of the board pined after Jarnkrok and claimed he’d be the 3C we needed.
People didn't really think of Jarnkrok as a center to be honest more a defensively responsible forward but we decided to play him at cetner.

Also Jarnkrok was fine here (he got PDO'D) and should have been re-signed to that deal he got in Toronto IMO. $2.1M is nothing really and think he could have helped shore up the bottom 6, either as C or RW
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 01:40 PM   #5188
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
People didn't really think of Jarnkrok as a center to be honest more a defensively responsible forward but we decided to play him at cetner.

Also Jarnkrok was fine here (he got PDO'D) and should have been re-signed to that deal he got in Toronto IMO. $2.1M is nothing really and think he could have helped shore up the bottom 6, either as C or RW
I'd take Jarnkrok at 2.1 over Rooney at 1.3 any day.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 01:40 PM   #5189
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
People didn't really think of Jarnkrok as a center to be honest more a defensively responsible forward but we decided to play him at cetner.

Also Jarnkrok was fine here (he got PDO'D) and should have been re-signed to that deal he got in Toronto IMO. $2.1M is nothing really and think he could have helped shore up the bottom 6, either as C or RW
I didn’t think of him as a centre, because he didn’t play C in Seattle. But go back and have a look at the posts asking Treliving to get him. They all said he should play centre.

I don’t disagree Jarnkrok was fine in his role.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 02:06 PM   #5190
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post


Re: Toews. He can fit at 50% retained if we ship Dube or equivalent out in the trade.
Better to just wait 2 or 3 months, then we could afford him without giving up any roster players

(not that I think he is the best answer, just saying)
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 02:18 PM   #5191
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

0's and periods....gotta see them.

Last edited by Leeman4Gilmour; 08-10-2022 at 02:21 PM.
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 02:19 PM   #5192
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Relief.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 02:19 PM   #5193
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1557042612804243461

Pretty much in line with other speculation. But, yikes.
FAke account.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 02:21 PM   #5194
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1557042612804243461

Pretty much in line with other speculation. But, yikes.

That's a fake account.
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 03:36 PM   #5195
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
0's and periods....gotta see them.
Just look for the blue check mark. If there isn't one, it's not likely a reliable source.

Also, check the date. That was posted over a day ago. If it was legit, there would definitely be a thread about it already.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!

Last edited by getbak; 08-10-2022 at 03:39 PM.
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 03:47 PM   #5196
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post

As the bones of a deal I would look at Kylington+ for Necas or Necas+ for Hanifin.
That sounds about right. But the Canes have one of the best D groups in the league already. Is Kylington really any better than Skjei? So while Necas is a good fit for the Flames, I don’t see a trade that helps both teams.

A deal with NYT for Chytil might be a better fit for both teams, and cheaper (Kylington straight up probably gets it done).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 04:34 PM   #5197
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
That sounds about right. But the Canes have one of the best D groups in the league already. Is Kylington really any better than Skjei? So while Necas is a good fit for the Flames, I don’t see a trade that helps both teams.

A deal with NYT for Chytil might be a better fit for both teams, and cheaper (Kylington straight up probably gets it done).
Or Kravstov
Though NYR similarly is stacked on the blueline and is already having a hard time working a guy like Jones into the lineup who is probably NHL ready.
So probably not a fit there either.
Wellity wellity wellity.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2022, 05:13 PM   #5198
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Strangely enough, I just read an article by The Hockey Writers where they theorize that the Rangers' aquisition of Trochek likely means the end of Filip Chytil's time in NY, as Trochek will be 2C. I don't necessarily agree, but Chytil would be a great aquisition. He's a 6'3" C with speed and skill. He had 22 pts in 42 games in 2020-21, but regressed to 22pts in 67 games last year, although I thought he looked in the playoffs (9 pts in 20 games).
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 05:18 PM   #5199
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Chytil IMO, is streaky AF like Zadina. More polished and consistent in between but same gamble on either of em. I'd take either in a d man swap. Would prefer Kravstov though. Just think he'd be benefitting being the top line RW for Lindy and Hubey. Just a hunch.

At worst a total middle 6 rw.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond

Last edited by dammage79; 08-10-2022 at 05:27 PM.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2022, 05:21 PM   #5200
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Chytil IMO, is streaky AF like Zadina. More polished and consistent in between but same gamble on either of em. I'd take in a d man swap. Would prefer Kravstov though. Just thunk he'd be benefitting being the top line RW for Lindy and Hubey. Just a hunch.

At worst a total middle 6 rw.
I agree, I would like to see what Kravstov would do. Not sure he fits in the Sutter mould though.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy