View Poll Results: Reaction to the trade?
|
Hate it
|
  
|
3 |
0.51% |
Dislike it
|
  
|
11 |
1.87% |
Whelmed
|
  
|
161 |
27.38% |
Like it
|
  
|
350 |
59.52% |
Love it
|
  
|
63 |
10.71% |
06-19-2024, 12:14 PM
|
#501
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I'm okay with the return as we are talking about a 34 year old goaltender here and I don't even know if a team has ever fetched a 1st round pick for a goaltender so close to 35 years old. Factor in that he was a free agent signing makes it pretty solid that they got four seasons of Markstrom, a 1st round pick and a young depth defenseman.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:16 PM
|
#502
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
Could this be cleaned up to if Flames 2025 is 2-32, then Montreal gets Calgary's pick?
|
Yes but there's some weird other unlikely secondary condition in there too I didn't bother writing in because it seemed too unlikely to worry about.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:16 PM
|
#503
|
Franchise Player
|
I feel CP generally talks about 1st round draft picks like they are the most coveted asset. People seem to like the unknown, or the infinite possibility of what a 1st round pick could become much more so than: a drafted prospect, young roster player, etc... 1st round picks are like gold around here.
Until the Flames trade for them...........................then people don't like it.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:16 PM
|
#504
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Why is it unfortunate?
To me, it is the best way to utilize cap space - sign decent players like DeBrusk, then trade them for assets. Rince and repeat.
Perfect way to round out the roster, while focusing on, and enhancing, the rebuild.
|
Every move he has made has been a rebuilding move. There is almost no reason, based on actions at least, to expect that to change. Over the past year there have been a number of certainties in certain corners of this site
1) Flames ownership will never allow a rebuild - seems to have been put to bed
2) Flames ownership will never retain - seems to have been put to bed
I think more and more that the Flames ownership is willing to allow their hockey management team a lot of leeway to implement their plan. Because a lot of the accepted wisdom seems to be proving false in my mind.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#505
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
|
in his ROOKIE nhl season
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#506
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zary's-Mustache
Actually sorry no you didn't. You reported what reputable insiders already reported.
That offer was already out when you reported it, not before...so why are you pretending that you reported it?
|
You are dead wrong, go back and actually look. You need to get a life. This is what happens when banned posters come back under another name. You are not supposed to even be in here so shut your trap.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#507
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
lol they're going to !@#$ this up and spend money in free agency.
|
Using cap space to acquire players who can then be traded for assets is the furthest thing from '#### this up'.
It is, IMO, the best way to utilize excess cap space. If other teams want to give you assets to take on a bad contract, great (and we have lots of room for that). But those deals are hard to come by. And the cap will be steadily rising for the next few years, so I think they will be fairly rare.
Sign players, then trade them in a couple years. Easy peasy
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:18 PM
|
#508
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
When I see that Written down it doesn't look that bad... I mean we have three T4 Defensmen in that list (Kylington was in our T4 before his mental health problems) + Bahl and Miromanov. We lack a true #1D in there and still need to see if Kylington get get back to where he was pre-struggles (and sans Tanev which is important).
|
It’s not that bad
Weegar Andersson
Miromanov Kylington (if resigned)
Pachal Bahl
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:18 PM
|
#509
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I'm okay with the return as we are talking about a 34 year old goaltender here and I don't even know if a team has ever fetched a 1st round pick for a goaltender so close to 35 years old. Factor in that he was a free agent signing makes it pretty solid that they got four seasons of Markstrom, a 1st round pick and a young depth defenseman.
|
To me there was just never any comparable trade that returned what had been kicked around on here.
The closest player to Marky to get dealt, was Ryan Miller who was 33 turning 34.
To Buffalo: Halak, Stewart, 1st, 3rd, Carrier
To St. Louis: Miller, Ott
Subtracting other parts around that deal, it's very comparable to what Conroy got today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Using cap space to acquire players who can then be traded for assets is the furthest thing from '#### this up'.
It is, IMO, the best way to utilize excess cap space. If other teams want to give you assets to take on a bad contract, great (and we have lots of room for that). But those deals are hard to come by. And the cap will be steadily rising for the next few years, so I think they will be fairly rare.
Sign players, then trade them in a couple years. Easy peasy
|
The big point of concern is the value of their own 2025 1st round pick. Signing players now, impacts the value and availability of the Flames own 2025 1st round pick. They just can't risk that pick - that's my opnion on this. I don't care much about signing players to trade down the road - the Flames most valuable asset in their entire organization is their own 2025 1st round pick.
Last edited by ComixZone; 06-19-2024 at 12:20 PM.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:19 PM
|
#510
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders
It’s not that bad
Weegar Andersson
Miromanov Kylington (if resigned)
Pachal Bahl
|
Canon on D
hmm off topic. I have worked SAIT Convocation last week. When did schools witch the Grad theme song to Canon in D from the Macho Man theme song?
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:20 PM
|
#511
|
Franchise Player
|
Conman created a lot of flexibility for himself.
Tons of capspace. Tons of picks. Tons of young prospects.
I’m very interested to see what further tricks he has up his sleeve.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:20 PM
|
#512
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor
" maintaining our commitment as a playoff competitive team."
They're really going out of their way to beat this drum and people still don't believe it.
|
Do you believe it?
If you were the GM of a team and your mandate was to make the playoffs, would you trade your #1 goalie for futures?
What does the guy have to do in order for you to NOT believe it?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:21 PM
|
#513
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
|
Twitter really seems to hate this deal for Calgary.
r/devils seems mixed to positive on the trade. Very happy they could keep Holtz.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:21 PM
|
#514
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
To me there was just never any comparable trade that returned what had been kicked around on here.
The closest player to Marky to get dealt, was Ryan Miller who was 33 turning 34.
To Buffalo: Halak, Stewart, 1st, 3rd, Carrier
To St. Louis: Miller, Ott
Subtracting other parts around that deal, it's very comparable to what Conroy got today.
The big point of concern is the value of their own 2025 1st round pick. Signing players now, impacts the value and availability of the Flames own 2025 1std round pick. They just can't risk that pick, is my opnion on this. I don't care much about signing players to trade down the road - the Flames most valuable asset in their entire organization is their own 2025 1st round pick.
|
Is the Mike Smith trade not far more comparable and more recent, too? That solidifies to me that Conroy did a fantastic job here.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:22 PM
|
#515
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHawk12
I was assured by many on here that 10th OA ++ was for sure what a retained Markstrom would be worth and that his value has only gone up since the deadline because Conroy holds all the cards with Marky. So getting a protected 2025 1st and Bahl seems underwhelming.
Also finding out that if for some reason Florida completely collapses and falls in the top 10, we'd have to give up our 1st to MTL after a whole year of tanking, AND not even get Florida's 2025 pick.
Ok then.
|
It's actually pretty close.
The discussion was mostly that:
Markstrom (50% retained)
41st (or even 28th in some scenarios)
For
2024 10th overall
So something like
Markstrom (31% retention)
For
2025 1st round (likely 15-25 range)
Bahl
Is pretty much equivalent value wise
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:22 PM
|
#516
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov
Canon on D
hmm off topic. I have worked SAIT Convocation last week. When did they ever switch the Grad theme song to Canon in D from the Macho Man theme song?
|
Haha, well done.
If Bahl has a hard shot, the new PBP guy will have a golden opportunity when Pachal passes to Bahl for the clapper
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:22 PM
|
#517
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:  
|
Flames lose Rick Ball but gain Kevin Bahl!
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:24 PM
|
#518
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
Is the Mike Smith trade not far more comparable and more recent, too? That solidifies to me that Conroy did a fantastic job here.
|
I don't view Mike Smith as a comparable. I think Marky is a step above Smith (as was Miller). Although with the retention, and Marky's play in 22/23, you're maybe not wrong - but I do just hold that Marky >> Smith view, 22/23 pain and all.
...I hated Mike Smith on the Flames.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:25 PM
|
#519
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Cap space doesn't mean free agency.
We can also take on a bad contract or 2 and get some assets that way, and if they player(s) can be rehabilitated assuming they are struggling, we can probably retain and flip them for even more assets.
|
|
|
06-19-2024, 12:25 PM
|
#520
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Markstrom is worth a 1st + Mercer at minimum, with no retention. Never forget!
|
I think it's on the reader to accept some blame if they're skimming a fan forum and assigning the top 5% most optimistic opinions as some sort of CP collective view or a given.
I know I've never logged in since February saw Mercer and a 1st and just assumed that was 100% the way this was going, and that I was building my case to be enraged if it wasn't.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM.
|
|