View Poll Results: What do you think the Avs will do?
|
Avs match, keep O'Reilly
|
  
|
178 |
35.89% |
Avs don't match, take the picks
|
  
|
318 |
64.11% |
02-28-2013, 04:45 PM
|
#501
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I agree.
As soon as Backlund is back, Stajan becomes a good trade candidate
|
Stajan has been playing well and he also has a modified NTC. My guess is Stempniak.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:45 PM
|
#502
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12
Can the avs take the picks like tomorrow? or do we have to wait 7 days?
|
avs would be smart to hold on as long as possible. that 1st round pick is there's to be had, might as well try to ensure it's as high as possible (ie. leave the flames with their crappy centers for another week).
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:45 PM
|
#503
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
|
No matter what happens, this thread will be awesome to read in May and June.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Jesus this site these days
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I should probably stop posting at this point
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#505
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
O'Reilly will help us solidify the 7th - 10th spot IMO.
Teams who will most likely finish worse than the Flames if we have ROR,
Edmonton, Colorado, Columbus, Buffalo, Washington, Florida, Winnipeg, New York Islanders.
That makes the 1st rounder 9th overall. If this is the case, the Flames have a 2.7% at 1st overall.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bourque's Twin For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#506
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12
Can the avs take the picks like tomorrow? or do we have to wait 7 days?
|
If they don't match it will probably go to the minute of the 7th day.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#507
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Not a huge fan because I think O'Reilly likely doesn't make this team a contender and we are looking at another couple of years of 6-10th place.
The contract looks awful and it isn't like the poison pill is going to be any good for the Flames either.
The one thing is it isn't a huge over pay in assets but overall seems like a deal for mediocrity.
It has okay upside and potential really bad downside so I guess I hope Colorado matches and I think they will.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#508
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
So if it turns out to be a top 5 pick, people will be pissed - naturally.
But what if the Flames make the playoffs - where would this move rank then?
|
Combined with the Hudler Wideman, Cervenka moves pretty savvy
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#509
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
Yea. Guy that is holding out for more money will give the Flames a deal in his next contract and not see $6.8 as a starting point? Hahaha.
Good luck with that.
He'll have all the leverage. The Flames will have to offer him a QO because they gave up a first and third for 100 games of his play. If they don't he can walk and sign with whoever he wants.
If I were a Flames fan I'd be begging for the Avalanche to match this. $6.8 a season for O'Reilly is a terrible contract that will screw up their salary structure for years.
|
This is the sort of paralyzed over analysis that makes us think some retread bum looking for a contract at 29 is the answer. Centres are the most valuable commodities in the league. You have to pay a price to get one. And when the center is as good and as young as ROR, you have to take that chance.
And keep in mind, the Avalanche let joe Sakic get to an offer sheet position. They don't like paying young players. And given that the flames will be able to offer him the extra year, (assuming he puts up good numbers and is the player we expect him to be) do you really think he's going to gamble and not sign an 8-year 48m deal that will still see him hit free agency at 30?
We get him now, we get him long term.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#510
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
Watching Dreger on TV, he sure sounds like he thinks the Avs will take the picks.
I think they'll take the picks as well. Guess we'll find out in a week.
|
I imagine we'll find out sooner if they decide to match. Gotta get him into their lineup.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#511
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin
What do you expect the flames to have offered him and also forced the avs to potentially let him walk then?
You have to overpay - at least Feaster did it on the short term and he can hopefully get him locked up on a better deal.
|
Better to overpay with cash than picks/prospects/players. People had all kinds of offers for O'Reilly involving Backlund, 1sts and an extra prospect here or there.
All we need is to give a 1st, potentially a good player, for another potentially good, but at least tested two way center.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#512
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
Great move by the Flames.
He's as good as the players they are sure to draft in the 10-20 position, which is almost guaranteed to be where they draft this year. They're simply not bad enough to finish at the bottom of the league.
There's no way Colorado wants to pay this kid 6.5M next year. And if they match, you cna bet he would make them pay every penny of it.
But if he comes ot Calgary, you have to think he'd be grateful to the organization for getting him out of Colorado, and back onto the ice. So much so, that he may very well re-sign with them for a more appropriate number, likely around the 5M range.
Great move by the Flames.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#513
|
Draft Pick
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
If the Flames pay a 1st, a 3rd and 10 million for 100 games of ROR, without getting any assets in return, that might go down as one of the worst franchise crippling moves in history.
|
100 games while we're hovering around the 8-12th seed in the western conference
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#514
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
ROR fills our most glaring need NOW. Not in 2 or 3 years...NOW.
Outside of the top 3 or 4 players, nothing is guaranteed from drafting. Even if you do get a good player, it often takes several years to get them to the point that ROR is at right now. The Flames aren't even guaranteed to draft top 5 (there are several teams in the East that are likely to finish below the Flames point wise).
Plus, you get a player like that to help this team get into the playoffs this year and it's an ok move... You get him to help this team into the playoffs for the next 5 or 6 years and it's a GREAT move.
Possible lineup (when Backlund returns)
Tanguay-ROR-Iginla
Glencross-Stajan-Cammalleri
Hudler-Backlund-Stempniak
Baertschi-Cervenka-Jackman
Comeau/Begin
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Last edited by Cali Panthers Fan; 02-28-2013 at 04:49 PM.
Reason: forgot Cammy!
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#515
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
If the Flames pay a 1st, a 3rd and 10 million for 100 games of ROR, without getting any assets in return, that might go down as one of the worst franchise crippling moves in history.
|
Except that he will be an RFA after those 100 games, so the Flames will either get him signed long-term or dealt for other assets. So your hypothetical is completely unrealistic.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#516
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Read through most of the pages... but they appear faster than I can read them, so if tthis link has been posted, my bad.
Scott Cullen article from a week or two ago
Excerpt, plus link below
Quote:
First, he played more than 2500 minutes through his first two seasons. Since 2000, there have been six other forwards to play that much as 18 and 19-year-olds and it's pretty good company: Sidney Crosby, Steven Stamkos, Ilya Kovalchuk, Jordan Staal, Jeff Skinner and Sam Gagner.
Secondly, since 2000, there have been 25 forwards (including O'Reilly) to record at least 50 points in their 20-year-old NHL season.
|
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=416077
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#517
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
|
O'Reilly >>> top 10 pick, so I'm not so sure what the issue exactly is. This is excellent from Calgary's perspective.
__________________
Quote:
I would take Sequin 10 time out of 10 before I took Hall, I said it on draft day that drafting Hall over the TS was possibly one of the dumbest moves that Lowe made
|
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#518
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
It seems unlikely that Feaster fired a fax off to O'Reilly's agent this morning. This has probably been in the works for a while - especially if the Canucks were also making offers - and it just got signed today. The player likely assessed his options for a few days before deciding to sign.
|
If that's how it played out, a slap in the face by ROR to the Avs that he's switching dressing rooms while the team is in town.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#519
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
People are actually concerned about a $6.5M qualifying offer in 2 years? Do people even know how RFAs work?
If the Flames qualify ROR in 2 years, yes, it will cost 6.5M per season.
But you DON'T HAVE TO QUALIFY AN RFA. You can simply re-sign players. The Flames will NOT be forced to pay ROR 6.5M.
Remember how it would have cost $2.5M to qualify Comeau this summer? How come that never happened?
I hope ROR plays to the quality of a $6.5M player in 2 years time, so I'd have no issue giving him that.
|
Huh? If you do not qualify an RFA they automatically become a UFA unless they are willing to sign for less than their qualifying offer. If a 24 year old O'Reilly is not qualified, why on god's green earth would he ever sign with the Flames for less than his QO when he could just walk out on July 1st and hit the UFA market? I would assume whatever lower offer the Flames made him before the UFA sweepstakes would either a) still be there in his worst case scenario or b) be topped by a better offer either by the Flames or some other team.
|
|
|
02-28-2013, 04:47 PM
|
#520
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Langkow 2.0?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 AM.
|
|