Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What do you think the Avs will do?
Avs match, keep O'Reilly 178 35.89%
Avs don't match, take the picks 318 64.11%
Voters: 496. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2013, 04:45 PM   #501
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I agree.

As soon as Backlund is back, Stajan becomes a good trade candidate
Stajan has been playing well and he also has a modified NTC. My guess is Stempniak.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:45 PM   #502
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12 View Post
Can the avs take the picks like tomorrow? or do we have to wait 7 days?
avs would be smart to hold on as long as possible. that 1st round pick is there's to be had, might as well try to ensure it's as high as possible (ie. leave the flames with their crappy centers for another week).
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:45 PM   #503
squiggs96
Franchise Player
 
squiggs96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
Exp:
Default

No matter what happens, this thread will be awesome to read in May and June.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Jesus this site these days
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame View Post
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I should probably stop posting at this point
squiggs96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #504
Henry Fool
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

I'll admit that my initial reaction was disappointment because the draft this year is extremely good, but obviously one's reaction depends on how one sees O'Reilly's potential, and I don't have a read on that. 50 points by itself is not that impressive. That's Matt Stajan in Toronto, Brandon Dubinsky in New York. I'm a little worried that the Avs fan here says that O'Really doesn't have huge offensive upside, because as much as I appreciate good defensive players, I have been dreaming about a rebuild that will bring in dynamic players that can carry the team.

Also, I think the people who say that it makes the possibility of the Flames trading away their assets less likely are correct. And I absolutely think they should sell.

My final worry is that young player who is already holding out for a contract will not be with the Flames after the next 3 seasons when he gets his UFA status. If they rebuild, that would be about the time when the other young players will start to make a difference.

If he has enough offense to be a first line center, then the price is fine. But I wouldn't be so quick to make fun of the fans who aren't immediately convinced that it's a positive move.
Henry Fool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #505
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

O'Reilly will help us solidify the 7th - 10th spot IMO.

Teams who will most likely finish worse than the Flames if we have ROR,
Edmonton, Colorado, Columbus, Buffalo, Washington, Florida, Winnipeg, New York Islanders.
That makes the 1st rounder 9th overall. If this is the case, the Flames have a 2.7% at 1st overall.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bourque's Twin For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #506
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurassicTunga12 View Post
Can the avs take the picks like tomorrow? or do we have to wait 7 days?
If they don't match it will probably go to the minute of the 7th day.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #507
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Not a huge fan because I think O'Reilly likely doesn't make this team a contender and we are looking at another couple of years of 6-10th place.

The contract looks awful and it isn't like the poison pill is going to be any good for the Flames either.

The one thing is it isn't a huge over pay in assets but overall seems like a deal for mediocrity.

It has okay upside and potential really bad downside so I guess I hope Colorado matches and I think they will.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #508
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
So if it turns out to be a top 5 pick, people will be pissed - naturally.

But what if the Flames make the playoffs - where would this move rank then?
Combined with the Hudler Wideman, Cervenka moves pretty savvy
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #509
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain View Post
Yea. Guy that is holding out for more money will give the Flames a deal in his next contract and not see $6.8 as a starting point? Hahaha.

Good luck with that.

He'll have all the leverage. The Flames will have to offer him a QO because they gave up a first and third for 100 games of his play. If they don't he can walk and sign with whoever he wants.

If I were a Flames fan I'd be begging for the Avalanche to match this. $6.8 a season for O'Reilly is a terrible contract that will screw up their salary structure for years.
This is the sort of paralyzed over analysis that makes us think some retread bum looking for a contract at 29 is the answer. Centres are the most valuable commodities in the league. You have to pay a price to get one. And when the center is as good and as young as ROR, you have to take that chance.

And keep in mind, the Avalanche let joe Sakic get to an offer sheet position. They don't like paying young players. And given that the flames will be able to offer him the extra year, (assuming he puts up good numbers and is the player we expect him to be) do you really think he's going to gamble and not sign an 8-year 48m deal that will still see him hit free agency at 30?

We get him now, we get him long term.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #510
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
Watching Dreger on TV, he sure sounds like he thinks the Avs will take the picks.

I think they'll take the picks as well. Guess we'll find out in a week.
I imagine we'll find out sooner if they decide to match. Gotta get him into their lineup.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #511
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
What do you expect the flames to have offered him and also forced the avs to potentially let him walk then?

You have to overpay - at least Feaster did it on the short term and he can hopefully get him locked up on a better deal.
Better to overpay with cash than picks/prospects/players. People had all kinds of offers for O'Reilly involving Backlund, 1sts and an extra prospect here or there.
All we need is to give a 1st, potentially a good player, for another potentially good, but at least tested two way center.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #512
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Great move by the Flames.

He's as good as the players they are sure to draft in the 10-20 position, which is almost guaranteed to be where they draft this year. They're simply not bad enough to finish at the bottom of the league.

There's no way Colorado wants to pay this kid 6.5M next year. And if they match, you cna bet he would make them pay every penny of it.

But if he comes ot Calgary, you have to think he'd be grateful to the organization for getting him out of Colorado, and back onto the ice. So much so, that he may very well re-sign with them for a more appropriate number, likely around the 5M range.

Great move by the Flames.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2013, 04:46 PM   #513
BintonB
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
If the Flames pay a 1st, a 3rd and 10 million for 100 games of ROR, without getting any assets in return, that might go down as one of the worst franchise crippling moves in history.
100 games while we're hovering around the 8-12th seed in the western conference
BintonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #514
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

ROR fills our most glaring need NOW. Not in 2 or 3 years...NOW.

Outside of the top 3 or 4 players, nothing is guaranteed from drafting. Even if you do get a good player, it often takes several years to get them to the point that ROR is at right now. The Flames aren't even guaranteed to draft top 5 (there are several teams in the East that are likely to finish below the Flames point wise).

Plus, you get a player like that to help this team get into the playoffs this year and it's an ok move... You get him to help this team into the playoffs for the next 5 or 6 years and it's a GREAT move.

Possible lineup (when Backlund returns)

Tanguay-ROR-Iginla
Glencross-Stajan-Cammalleri
Hudler-Backlund-Stempniak
Baertschi-Cervenka-Jackman
Comeau/Begin
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender

Last edited by Cali Panthers Fan; 02-28-2013 at 04:49 PM. Reason: forgot Cammy!
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #515
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
If the Flames pay a 1st, a 3rd and 10 million for 100 games of ROR, without getting any assets in return, that might go down as one of the worst franchise crippling moves in history.
Except that he will be an RFA after those 100 games, so the Flames will either get him signed long-term or dealt for other assets. So your hypothetical is completely unrealistic.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #516
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Read through most of the pages... but they appear faster than I can read them, so if tthis link has been posted, my bad.

Scott Cullen article from a week or two ago
Excerpt, plus link below

Quote:
First, he played more than 2500 minutes through his first two seasons. Since 2000, there have been six other forwards to play that much as 18 and 19-year-olds and it's pretty good company: Sidney Crosby, Steven Stamkos, Ilya Kovalchuk, Jordan Staal, Jeff Skinner and Sam Gagner.

Secondly, since 2000, there have been 25 forwards (including O'Reilly) to record at least 50 points in their 20-year-old NHL season.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=416077
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #517
Ezio
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

O'Reilly >>> top 10 pick, so I'm not so sure what the issue exactly is. This is excellent from Calgary's perspective.
__________________
Quote:
I would take Sequin 10 time out of 10 before I took Hall, I said it on draft day that drafting Hall over the TS was possibly one of the dumbest moves that Lowe made
Ezio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #518
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
It seems unlikely that Feaster fired a fax off to O'Reilly's agent this morning. This has probably been in the works for a while - especially if the Canucks were also making offers - and it just got signed today. The player likely assessed his options for a few days before deciding to sign.
If that's how it played out, a slap in the face by ROR to the Avs that he's switching dressing rooms while the team is in town.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #519
EddyBeers
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
People are actually concerned about a $6.5M qualifying offer in 2 years? Do people even know how RFAs work?

If the Flames qualify ROR in 2 years, yes, it will cost 6.5M per season.

But you DON'T HAVE TO QUALIFY AN RFA. You can simply re-sign players. The Flames will NOT be forced to pay ROR 6.5M.

Remember how it would have cost $2.5M to qualify Comeau this summer? How come that never happened?

I hope ROR plays to the quality of a $6.5M player in 2 years time, so I'd have no issue giving him that.
Huh? If you do not qualify an RFA they automatically become a UFA unless they are willing to sign for less than their qualifying offer. If a 24 year old O'Reilly is not qualified, why on god's green earth would he ever sign with the Flames for less than his QO when he could just walk out on July 1st and hit the UFA market? I would assume whatever lower offer the Flames made him before the UFA sweepstakes would either a) still be there in his worst case scenario or b) be topped by a better offer either by the Flames or some other team.
EddyBeers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013, 04:47 PM   #520
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Langkow 2.0?
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy