2011 CFL thread - Page 25 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Erick Estrada · 09-04-2011, 04:56 PM

Not sure why only the Bombers are getting disqualified. The game's over so the officials can put their Riders bias away for another week.

Cecil Terwilliger · 09-04-2011, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

Not sure why only the Bombers are getting disqualified. The game's over so the officials can put their Riders bias away for another week.

Didn't embarrass the league "leaders" bad enough, we needed the refs to rub salt in those fresh wounds we inflicted.

Bombers were really exposed today. Their D isn't that good against the run and their offence is terrible.

If the Bomber D doesn't win them the game they don't have a chance.

Flames in 07 · 09-04-2011, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

Not sure why only the Bombers are getting disqualified. The game's over so the officials can put their Riders bias away for another week.

we ll 81 was disqualified for punching a guy. They got that call right, but I have no idea what Wpg #84 did wrong.

Cecil Terwilliger · 09-04-2011, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flames in 07

we ll 81 was disqualified for punching a guy. They got that call right, but I have no idea what Wpg #84 did wrong.

He was the one that did the WWE tackle well after the play was over.

moon · 09-04-2011, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flames in 07

but I have no idea what Wpg #84 did wrong.

He wasn't wearing a Priders jersey.

Flames in 07 · 09-04-2011, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

He was the one that did the WWE tackle well after the play was over.

Thanks for the tip, I saw the tackle, can you tell me which rule he broke?

btw, Glen Suitor not liking the tackle doesn't make it a penalty.

Cecil Terwilliger · 09-04-2011, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flames in 07

Thanks for the tip, I saw the tackle, can you tell me which rule he broke?

btw, Glen Suitor not liking the tackle doesn't make it a penalty.

Last time I checked WWE tackling a guy after the play is over is a penalty.

I guess you must be new to the cfl if I have to explain unnecessary roughness to you, either that or you've been drinking moon and EE's koolaid.

Flames in 07 · 09-04-2011, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Last time I checked WWE tackling a guy after the play is over is a penalty.

I guess you must be new to the cfl if I have to explain unnecessary roughness to you, either that or you've been drinking moon and EE's koolaid.

Play wasn't over. No whistle and they were in the field of play. So you are false when you say the play was over.

And you didn't check the rule book because you don't have one, nor do you know much about it. I'm not new to Cdn football and I bet my experience with football (sitting on a sofa and watching a game excluded) is probably 100:1 compared to you.

The fact is, the play wasn't over. And you can't quote me a rule that says if you tackle like a WWE move it's a penalty.

I don't drink Moon's coolaid. I think his posts are quite low quality actually. The refs aren't biased, they are just unskilled because they don't get anything close to resonable practise to prepare for the CFL.

moon · 09-04-2011, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flames in 07

I don't drink Moon's coolaid. I think his posts are quite low quality actually. The refs aren't biased, they are just unskilled because they don't get anything close to resonable practise to prepare for the CFL.

Oh no Flames in 07 doesn't like my posts what will I do?

The refs for the most part make bad calls because they suck but the league definitely has a bias towards the Riders which lead to the crappy refs giving the Riders more calls because they see that is what the league wants.

sa226 · 09-04-2011, 05:50 PM

Haha oh man, as a Stamps fan living in Winnipeg, I am torn on how I feel about this game.

On the one hand I shouldn't be happy anytime the Riders win, but seeing and hearing all of this "Swaggerville" nonsense and that sign being put up in Sask....I find this quite hilarious.

Achmed · 09-04-2011, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Last time I checked WWE tackling a guy after the play is over is a penalty.

I guess you must be new to the cfl if I have to explain unnecessary roughness to you, either that or you've been drinking moon and EE's koolaid.

Don't you just hate Cansuck fans? They make excuses, tell lies and twist truths in order to get everyone to quit claiming they are nothing without cheating and officiating help. Oh wait this is a CFL thread. Please substitute Cansuck fans with Rider whiners. Thanks.

Howie_16 · 09-04-2011, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Achmed

Don't you just hate Cansuck fans? They make excuses, tell lies and twist truths in order to get everyone to quit claiming they are nothing without cheating and officiating help. Oh wait this is a CFL thread. Please substitute Cansuck fans with Rider whiners. Thanks.

The 'Riders suck. So does their fanbase. Especially those 'Rider fans that live in Calgary. You live in Calgary. By choice. We have a CFL team here. Support them, or move back.

Cheerio · 09-04-2011, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howie_16

The 'Riders suck. So does their fanbase. Especially those 'Rider fans that live in Calgary. You live in Calgary. By choice. We have a CFL team here. Support them, or move back.

You're kidding right?

Howie_16 · 09-04-2011, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheerio

You're kidding right?

Nope.

Erick Estrada · 09-04-2011, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Didn't embarrass the league "leaders" bad enough, we needed the refs to rub salt in those fresh wounds we inflicted.

Bombers were really exposed today. Their D isn't that good against the run and their offence is terrible.

If the Bomber D doesn't win them the game they don't have a chance.

No surprise the Bombers are overrated but I wouldn't get too excited about a single win when your record is 2-7. Riders aren't going to play against offences that putrid on a regular basis.

Achmed · 09-04-2011, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howie_16

The 'Riders suck. So does their fanbase. Especially those 'Rider fans that live in Calgary. You live in Calgary. By choice. We have a CFL team here. Support them, or move back.

Machiavelli · 09-05-2011, 08:17 AM

That was a really poor effort by Pierce and the rest of the Bombers' O. They're going to have to do much better in the second half of the season to stay close to the Als.

GirlySports · 09-05-2011, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howie_16

The 'Riders suck. So does their fanbase. Especially those 'Rider fans that live in Calgary. You live in Calgary. By choice. We have a CFL team here. Support them, or move back.

Come on, I don't like the Riders but that's ridiculous.

If you moved to Dallas you'd stop cheering for the Flames?

I_H8_Crawford · 09-05-2011, 09:47 AM

The Bombers' O is terrible.

All a team has to do is score 20 points, and they will win vs Wpg.

Cheerio · 09-05-2011, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howie_16

Nope.

So if you got transferred to Vancouver for work and got a raise (because no one really wants to live there), you would become a diehard Canucks fan? C'mon man!