Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2025, 06:53 PM   #4861
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Redemption for Lukes, and about 1/3 to making back the difference on the botched call before for Berrios.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 06:55 PM   #4862
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Let’s be clear - interference on a ball that would have been “over the fence” is simply not a thing. You can’t interfere on a ball that would have been a home run because it wouldn’t be ####ing interference. What the actual ####.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ben voyonsdonc For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 07:00 PM   #4863
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

That extra explanation just made no sense.
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 07:05 PM   #4864
EN FUEGO
Powerplay Quarterback
 
EN FUEGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central Sierra, CA
Exp:
Default

We gonna review this one now? Great swing by Jo-Lo.
__________________

EN FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 07:16 PM   #4865
EN FUEGO
Powerplay Quarterback
 
EN FUEGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central Sierra, CA
Exp:
Default

So if you go to a Jays game now.....get seats right on the fence. If that ball is hit anywhere near you by a member of the opposition, make sure you get that ball, even if your buddy has to hold you by the ankles!
__________________

EN FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 07:18 PM   #4866
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Once again, you can’t interfere with a ball if it was over the fence. You can have interference or a home run but you can’t have interference and a home run.

The MLB should have said “it wasn’t interference because we couldn’t definitively say that the ball wasn’t going over the fence.”
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 07:19 PM   #4867
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben voyonsdonc View Post
Let’s be clear - interference on a ball that would have been “over the fence” is simply not a thing. You can’t interfere on a ball that would have been a home run because it wouldn’t be ####ing interference. What the actual ####.
Dan just explained it and what he said is correct. It can be interference and a home run.

What’s mind boggling is that means NY determined Lukes could not have caught the ball which is absolutely insane.

Not only was it not 100% obvious that the ball was gonna leave the park but it looked like Lukes was likely going to catch it.

Which means New York got it wrong on both accounts.

The only thing correct in all of that is the rule but in every way they interpreted the rule they got it wrong.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 07:21 PM   #4868
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

New York Ump: "What's the score in the Yankees game? Yankees are winning? Ok, I choose option 3".
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 07:27 PM   #4869
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
Dan just explained it and what he said is correct. It can be interference and a home run.

What’s mind boggling is that means NY determined Lukes could not have caught the ball which is absolutely insane.

Not only was it not 100% obvious that the ball was gonna leave the park but it looked like Lukes was likely going to catch it.

Which means New York got it wrong on both accounts.

The only thing correct in all of that is the rule but in every way they interpreted the rule they got it wrong.
I disagree that you can have interference and a home run at the same time. The fact that there is an admission that there was interference means the ball was going to land in the field of play. You can only interfere with a ball in play. You simply cannot interfere with a ball that wasn’t in play.

The correct ruling IMO to justify what happened should have been: there isn’t conclusive evidence to indicate that it was going to land in the field of play. As such, there is no interference and the call on the field stands.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ben voyonsdonc For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 07:33 PM   #4870
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Someone please muzzle that kid.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 07:49 PM   #4871
MRCboicgy
Referee
 
MRCboicgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your enterprise AI
Exp:
Default

On the bright side, the Twins have scored 7 to cut the lead to 10-8
__________________
You’re just old hate balls.
--Funniest mod complaint in CP history.
MRCboicgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 07:50 PM   #4872
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The odds of Berrios being on the playoff roster are probably less than 50/50 IMO. He just isn’t right and right now, he isn’t good enough to start and isn’t a good arm out of the bullpen.

I still think he’s got a nagging injury and is too proud to give up his streak. His pride could cost him the playoff roster position.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:02 PM   #4873
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Loperfido has one of the weakest arms in the game and any third base coach would know that.

Little is just so frustrating sometimes.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:12 PM   #4874
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

That was a great double play
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:15 PM   #4875
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff View Post
That was a great double play
Great job by Clement and a solid stretch by Vlad.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:18 PM   #4876
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben voyonsdonc View Post
Great job by Clement and a solid stretch by Vlad.
And Gimenez to start it while the running Rays player was right in front of the ball
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2025, 08:20 PM   #4877
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Schneider is pushing his luck with Dominguez.

This is kind of Seranthony’s MO.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:26 PM   #4878
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

ugh
__________________
Mathgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:26 PM   #4879
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Kirk has been a lot less effective throwing out runners…probably because his pop time has slowed down. His pop time had improved quite a bit over last year but the wear and tear of catching almost every day is probably catching up to him. Not sure throwing through there was really worth the risk and could have jeopardized a called strike three if Diaz hadn’t swung and missed.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2025, 08:28 PM   #4880
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

MLB war room getting a bit nervous after gifting the Rays 3 runs.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy