Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2023, 04:16 PM   #461
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
LOL. Are you no longer a Coyote fan?
He was just hurt by Calgary, so he froths at the mouth when there's a chance to disparage this city. No one cares what he says.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:16 PM   #462
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
I'll be honest spending $1.2B and not getting a new stadium out of it too kind of stings. I would love to see if they could get something similar to Juventus stadium that was posted for around $300M.
Yep. The previous sports district concept was $400M less, and included a new arena, 40,000 seat indoor stadium, community arena and site works. Crazy how much things have changed since then.
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:16 PM   #463
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

I feel like CSEC's piece of the pie could have been larger.

I like how they grouped the province and CSEC's contributions together to make it appear 50/50, when CSEC itself is hardly touching 1/3.

I suppose if it is functioning as multiple things for the community an argument can be made though.

Just get the shovels in dirt so we don't have to think about it so much. Let's swallow the pill and be over with it.

Had to get done.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:16 PM   #464
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Oh look, another person that doesn't know, or just ignores, that that cost change was part of the original deal.
Yeah. Gondek was dumb for giving Murray an excuse to walk but he would have walked either way.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:17 PM   #465
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
As a flames fan it's exciting to get a new arena.

As a calgarian, the city and province is getting absolutely screwed.

The rich get richer...
Agree. But this was inevitable, and long overdue. That's the kicker, should have happened a decade ago.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:18 PM   #466
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Yeah. Gondek was dumb for giving Murray an excuse to walk but he would have walked either way.
Pretty much. Between higher construction costs and higher financing costs, there was no way the flames were going to stand by the prior deal.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:18 PM   #467
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

There will be lots of angst about the increased dollar figure, but I'll give them one thing. This does look to be a proper accounting of the full scope, including infrastructure, that was always going end up being required and publicly funded in the old deal.

Also a nice dollop of inflation I'm sure, but not as bad as it looks on the surface.
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:18 PM   #468
Gemnoble
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Gemnoble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

That CSEC guy was a bit of a dick at the end.
Gemnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gemnoble For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:18 PM   #469
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Oh look, another person that doesn't know, or just ignores, that that cost change was part of the original deal.
Flames agreed to pay the cost over runs that was in my post... but this was seen as incremental asks from the city by CESC not cost over runs.

My point still stands though, the city would have been smart to just say...okay we will cover that extra money they were requesting from just to not have the deal fall through at that time. It's going to end up costing them way more now.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:19 PM   #470
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Woulda been nice if we had the Olympics coming and we coulda put some of that sweet sweet federal money toward a new rink and stadium.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:19 PM   #471
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

So did I hear right that essentially the money from the old deal is forwarded to this and the extra city potion is cash in hand from a sustainability fund? So city has all the funds and just needs CSEC and AB gov to pony up?
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:19 PM   #472
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Flames agreed to pay the cost over runs that was in my post... but this was seen as incremental asks from the city by CESC not cost over runs.

My point still stands though, the city would have been smart to just say...okay we will cover that extra money they were requesting from just to not have the deal fall through at that time. It's going to end up costing them way more now.
Basically it would have been smart for them to realize they were dealing with a bad faith actor.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:20 PM   #473
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

There must be some law that states the bigger the project, the greater the chance of cost overruns.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:20 PM   #474
Hoop27
Backup Goalie
 
Hoop27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Exp:
Default

Who owns the building? City or CSEC?
__________________
Hoop27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:20 PM   #475
Leondros
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Deal seems fine to me for Calgarians given the provincial contribution. The cheaper way to do this was going to be the Olympics route and the citizens turned that down.

For reference to get the Saddledome built the following was paid:

the Olympic Saddledome was funded entirely by three levels of government – $31.5 million from the City of Calgary, $31.5 million from the Government of Alberta and $29.7 million from the Government of Canada – and the Olympic organizing committee ($5 million).

In today's dollars that roughly $300M just for the structure without considering land inflation/other inflated costs not tied to the CPI.

The Saddledome was never funded by an NHL team and it will be interesting to see the full fiscal terms of the rent agreements but they don't look different than what most NHL teams are doing.

Add in the infrastructure we are getting, the upside to an entertainment district, community arena and event center and I am pretty sold.
Leondros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:20 PM   #476
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Yep. The previous sports district concept was $400M less, and included a new arena, 40,000 seat indoor stadium, community arena and site works. Crazy how much things have changed since then.
It really is too bad they couldn't figure out a deal back then and just moved it to
Stampede park instead of the West Village back then.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:21 PM   #477
chummer
Franchise Player
 
chummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gemnoble View Post
That CSEC guy was a bit of a dick at the end.
It was a fair question from Gilbertson, Beane didn't have to be a dick about it.
chummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:21 PM   #478
MonaTone
Scoring Winger
 
MonaTone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Woulda been nice if we had the Olympics coming and we coulda put some of that sweet sweet federal money toward a new rink and stadium.
Yup when your hosing regular people to funnel money into billionaires pockets you want to spread it out as much as possible over the population.
MonaTone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2023, 04:21 PM   #479
Gemnoble
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Gemnoble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoop27 View Post
Who owns the building? City or CSEC?
The city owns it.
Gemnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gemnoble For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2023, 04:21 PM   #480
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Are we getting a new stadium for Stampeders?
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy