View Poll Results: Do you feel not using public funds is worth the Flames moving?
|
Yes
|
  
|
180 |
32.26% |
No
|
  
|
378 |
67.74% |
03-28-2017, 08:27 AM
|
#461
|
Retired
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Back in Guelph
|
Right, but that doesn't all go to the Flames building. Public money for a public field house makes sense. Same with transit, and most other things you outlined. But at least you laid it out, most people I talk to throw that half billion dollars out there like it's just going into 'an arena for billionaires'.
I agree that the location was a mistake though. The site needs to be cleaned but this isn't the way to do it.
Last edited by TheFlamesVan; 03-28-2017 at 08:29 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 08:27 AM
|
#462
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
Calgarynext should be dead unless the Flames want to move to a new building in 10 years. They're totally underestimating the amount of time needed to clean up the site. Just a really bad idea from the start.
|
The entire area doesn't need to be cleaned at once though. They mentioned a project around Vancouver that is doing this. The remediation happens as they go.
In any event, doesn't really matter, this was always a hailmary to get a replacement stadium for the Stamps.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 08:37 AM
|
#463
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlamesVan
Right, but that doesn't all go to the Flames building. Public money for a public field house makes sense.
|
Public except for when the Stamps play and want to practice, meaning the CSEC wants the city to build them their new stadium they can make a profit on under the guise of 'its a public building except when we want to make money off it', on a plot of land that doesn't make any sense for the city since it would take up a huge footprint of the CRL that would ideally go to fund the remediation and infrastructure changes needed on the site.
CalgaryNEXT relies on a minimum of $440M of public money to go through. Those are the facts. Money that can be spent in better ways to provide the same benefits to boot.
Last edited by Roughneck; 03-28-2017 at 08:51 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 08:55 AM
|
#464
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
The entire area doesn't need to be cleaned at once though. They mentioned a project around Vancouver that is doing this. The remediation happens as they go.
In any event, doesn't really matter, this was always a hailmary to get a replacement stadium for the Stamps.
|
But for the CRL portion to actually get funded you need development, and in this case the plot of land for development left after the footprint of NEXT is taken up they might as well just do it all at once anyway to allow development as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 08:59 AM
|
#465
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
To properly do West Village...meaning remediation, an appropriate riverfront, a full-assed realignment of Bow Trail / 14th St (and probably tied into any Crowchild upgrades)...I wouldn't be surprised if it took over a $1B of public money, and solid decade to do.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:02 AM
|
#466
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
I think the fact that CalgaryNext in that iteration is dead is of little surprise. But the way the Mayor chooses to handle these things doesn't send a message that the city is a willing and cooperative partner. Both sides have mishandled this but I would expect our city leader to set the tone and example - not just drop statements like this to the media if it hadn't first communicated to the Flames.
Nenshi has many positive qualities but this stuff drive me nuts.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:09 AM
|
#467
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
I think the fact that CalgaryNext in that iteration is dead is of little surprise. But the way the Mayor chooses to handle these things doesn't send a message that the city is a willing and cooperative partner. Both sides of mishandled this but I would expect our city leader to set the tone and example - not just drop statements like this to the media if it hadn't first communicated to the Flames.
Nenshi has many positive qualities but this stuff drive me nuts.
|
Nenshi's many positive qualities are swiftly dwindling IMO.
He has this d**kheadish arrogance to him that shows up a lot more often now.
Especially when it concerns the new arena...drives me nuts too!
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:11 AM
|
#468
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Perhaps this is the only language CSEC understands.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:27 AM
|
#469
|
Voted for Kodos
|
It was pretty obvious that CalgaryNext was never ever going to happen, even on the day it was announced. The financials for the proposed CRL were not even close to making sense.
I have no issue with Nenshi criticizing the plan and how he has handled it with CSEG. When CSEG is intentionally playing dumb because they know the numbers don't work, and the city goes above and beyond up work with the stupid idea, at some point frustration sets in.
So far, the city has been generally on board with the plan B option, and will probably be able to put a little bit of public money in there to help make the project right.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:32 AM
|
#470
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Nenshi is running for re-election in the Fall.
Brazen and confrontational language regarding a major election issue is carefully planned here.
We're in an economic downturn. Support for CalgaryNext would have been a terrible move.
These kind of statements are intended to make headlines in the paper and alleviate taxpayer apprehension for huge capital spends. Mission accomplished.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:33 AM
|
#471
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
^ I agree. I quite like it when our mayor is frank about the way he views obvious issues.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 09:33 AM
|
#472
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley
Nenshi's many positive qualities are swiftly dwindling IMO.
He has this d**kheadish arrogance to him that shows up a lot more often now.
Especially when it concerns the new arena...drives me nuts too!
|
On one hand, I agree that Nenshi's arrogance is grating. On the other, Bettman is probably his match there. And we know Nenshi met with Bettman directly and told him to his face he didn't think getting involved would be beneficial to the process.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:03 AM
|
#473
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
This harebrained scheme was barely half-cocked to begin with.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:05 AM
|
#474
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
I think the fact that CalgaryNext in that iteration is dead is of little surprise. But the way the Mayor chooses to handle these things doesn't send a message that the city is a willing and cooperative partner. Both sides of mishandled this but I would expect our city leader to set the tone and example - not just drop statements like this to the media if it hadn't first communicated to the Flames.
Nenshi has many positive qualities but this stuff drive me nuts.
|
You think Nenshi didn't communicate this to CSEC before making these statements? That's naive.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:12 AM
|
#475
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
You think Nenshi didn't communicate this to CSEC before making these statements? That's naive.
|
given the year that Nenshi has had I'm not sure Jiri is the naive one.
between needing to bloviate to a cab driver in Toronto about how he put Uber in their place.
or hammering a political opponent by suggesting she had poor math skills
or going after Calgary Nexxt in these little impromptu press conferences he's shown that he doesn't seem to exactly be a team player.
Evan Wooley's comments appear to suggest the mayor has jumped ahead of the plan as well.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:13 AM
|
#476
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
It was pretty obvious that CalgaryNext was never ever going to happen, even on the day it was announced. The financials for the proposed CRL were not even close to making sense.
I have no issue with Nenshi criticizing the plan and how he has handled it with CSEG. When CSEG is intentionally playing dumb because they know the numbers don't work, and the city goes above and beyond up work with the stupid idea, at some point frustration sets in.
So far, the city has been generally on board with the plan B option, and will probably be able to put a little bit of public money in there to help make the project right.
|
But, the City is not going above and beyond in any way, shape or form, and has not actually told CSEC anything about what they are prepared to do on Plan B. Absolutely nothing. They would not treat any other major City employer like this.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:14 AM
|
#477
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
You think Nenshi didn't communicate this to CSEC before making these statements? That's naive.
|
I know that they have not.
|
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:15 AM
|
#478
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
You think Nenshi didn't communicate this to CSEC before making these statements? That's naive.
|
Based on KK's comments it doesn't seem like he did.
And Nenshi has shown a pattern of commenting on stuff "off the cuff"
The man loves his sound bites.
The city and the Flames need to be partners on this. Both need to start acting like it.
I expect more out of our top elected city official.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:22 AM
|
#479
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Imagining Nenshi & Bettman in the same room. So much snark in one place at one time.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2017, 10:23 AM
|
#480
|
My face is a bum!
|
Edit: ^I'm too slow. Andy wordy apparently...
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias
On one hand, I agree that Nenshi's arrogance is grating. On the other, Bettman is probably his match there. And we know Nenshi met with Bettman directly and told him to his face he didn't think getting involved would be beneficial to the process. 
|
The funny thing is I actually overall like both Bettman and Nenshi, but both lack some serious tact with the way they express their opinions and treat their stakeholders.
Imagining both of them in the same room in full Nenshi and Bettman mode would be the most unproductive, painful thing I could imagine.
Yet seeing Bettman destroy Ron Maclean or Nenshi take down Sun reporters somehow is a thing of beauty to me.
Polarizing guys for sure.
I think it's pretty obvious to all Calgary Next is dead, but there are proper methods to messaging these things.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.
|
|