Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2023, 01:07 PM   #4401
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I wonder what the backlash is going to be with the NDP and Liberals voting down the Conservative bill on bail reform.
There is no conservative bill on bail reform. The conservatives presented a motion on telling the federal government to fix bail.

So they didn’t do any of the work required to actually provide a constitutional fix to the problem.

https://www.westernstandard.news/new...1b508dba9.html

Surprisingly the western standard has the only link to the actual motion.

The premiers recently asked the federal government to look at this and lametti states the government is looking at it.

So what was this motion for? Clearly to generate outrage.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2023, 03:13 PM   #4402
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

fair enough. my general grumble about this is the optics of the government announcing $173 million to a company that seemingly pulls up stakes a little more than two years after the announcement.

maybe the question is did the government actually provide the promised money as i assume they do not roll into these announcements with a cheque in hand

it also looks clunky given this company is apparently located in the riding of a liberal MP who is the minister of the portfolio.

to me it has a similar feeling of the liberals buying all those ventilators (that were apparently never delivered) from a company connected to a former liberal MP

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
Well if a Blacklock's reporter says it, it must be true. Never mind the fact that the facility was announced in May of 2015, a time when the Liberals weren't in government and had only 7 seats in all of Quebec (all in the Montreal area). Or that the facility is located in the riding of Beauport—Limoilou which has been held by Bloc or Conservative MPs for the last decade and hasn't elected a Liberal in its history.

The 2020 funding was for an expansion to the under construction facility so it could produce COVID vaccines. The Strategic Innovation Fund (which is the program under which the facility expansion was funded) is normally a combination of loans and grants, and both of those tend to be conditional. So unless Innovation Canada significantly departed from their normal process, the grantee can't just not fulfill the project while keeping the money.
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2023, 04:57 PM   #4403
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone View Post
fair enough. my general grumble about this is the optics of the government announcing $173 million to a company that seemingly pulls up stakes a little more than two years after the announcement.

maybe the question is did the government actually provide the promised money as i assume they do not roll into these announcements with a cheque in hand
Normally funding is awarded relatively early in the process (though often for bigger projects it's doled out in stages after milestones are reached). But without knowing the exact details of the grant, it's hard to say.

But like I said, unless there was a significant departure from basically every other grant program, the funding is conditional on the project going forward.

Quote:
it also looks clunky given this company is apparently located in the riding of a liberal MP who is the minister of the portfolio.

to me it has a similar feeling of the liberals buying all those ventilators (that were apparently never delivered) from a company connected to a former liberal MP
But it's not; that's flat out fiction. Neither the facility nor the company's headquarters are in that Minister's riding. Neither is within 100km of Champagne's riding.

And you're talking like this is some podunk organization that was just handed a bunch of money. With it's facility (that was already 2 years into construction when the funds were awarded) Medicago was by far the closest to having large-scale vaccine manufacturing capabilities of anyone in Canada. And hopefully they can get someone else to take over the facility because having that is important to our country's security.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2023, 05:06 PM   #4404
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think you missed my point in your first paragraph. I was saying that when we compare healthcare outcomes with European nations based on per person spending Canada often comes out behind. The argument you appear to be making is that this is do to a lack of private involvement. I’m suggesting that because we compete with the US for labour our labour costs are higher than our European counterparts and that is much of the reason for the difference in outcomes per dollar spent.

Reporting results is on thing I’d argue the government does far better than the private sector. It’s a cost that offers no income therefore unless it’s driving optimization the reporting you want done likely doesn’t as not happen unless mandatory.

I think it’s a significant myth that the private sector is always more efficient. In order for the competition motive to drive costs down and efficiency up you need low barriers to entry to ensure competition, you need a consumer with repeated opportunities to make a choice between provider, you need a consumer that is aware of the cost of their choice and you need a consumer that is knowledgeable enough to not be at a large information deficit. Without these things all efficiency is absorbed by profit and lower quality.

I’d suggest that expanding private health care to things like surgeries and hospital services is much closer to Canadian telecom or groceries then and industry that will have real competition. Remember that Saskatchewan has lower cell phone prices because of its public sector telecom. Could the private sector help? Yes in things like a Family doctor where you make many visits and have an opportunity for choice it likely works ok. The payment structure though clearly drives inefficiency into the system encouraging multiple visits. In any public funded private delivery system there will be drag as people game the system to maximize profit.
What you really wanted to say is that who on earth would trust the provinces to setup a private healthcare delivery model where the people in charge wouldn't just do it in a way where it would benefit their corporate cronies?

There are of course lots of things a country could do to fix a fundamentally broken health care system.

We could look at successful European models and implement certain aspects as 'trials' to see if they would work.

Work with staff members in specific areas to implement some of their recommendations on a small scale, and level up as needed.

Do targeted funding increases to clear wait lists. I.E. where in Canada is the wait list for heart surgeries the longest? Work with that hospital to process through patients faster. Trial and error some of the things they suggest. Not talking how they perform surgery, but I'm sure they have a list of stuff that would help them operate more effectively. Give them a blank cheque for 1 year to implement changes.

What gets me is that the people who work at the hospitals likely have lots of recommendations on how to improve things, but talking to friends that are nurses, these recommendations are hardly ever looked at, much less talked about. Most changes are implemented after the government spends $30 million getting one of their cronies to do a 'review' and come up with a report on 'How To Fix Canadian Health Care 2023 Version.' There are course are versions for most other years as well.

Then you have politicians who from term to term either restructure everything into 1 major district, or in the next term restructure it again from 1 major district into 14 smaller districts, and they think they've done something!

It is amazing to watch, and both pathetic at the same time.

Of course, Canadians are also at fault, because we can hardly ever talk about health care changes without instantly launching into 'but we don't wanna be like the US.'

Usually that post is found 4-5 posts after someone suggests that perhaps we need to do something different.

Happens here, happens on Reddit, Twitter, everywhere. Its almost part of Canadian culture at this point.

Of course I have friends in the US who have insurance through their company, and they have access to WAY better health care.

But here in Canada I can only dream of actually finding a family doctor.

Fun times as a country. About to get even funner with as obesity further tears down the system.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2023, 05:06 PM   #4405
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
The private sector is not efficient. Even Zuckerberg thinks so, with his “managers managing managers, managing managers, managing managers, managing the people who are doing the work” comment.

Private long term care homes have some of the highest prices and lowest quality of care. This stems from their “requirement” to make a sizeable profit. Is that efficient? Only someone who cares about profit might think so
That problem is easily solved by only allowing non-profits to operate within our health care system.

I wonder what other country does this.....
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2023, 05:14 PM   #4406
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tru...deal-1.6740143



This is good. Hopefully it comes with conditions on what it can be used on.
Interesting, 5% for 5 years then back down to 3%. Better than nothing but was really hoping it would go back to 10% like it was before
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2023, 08:46 PM   #4407
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Interesting, 5% for 5 years then back down to 3%. Better than nothing but was really hoping it would go back to 10% like it was before
The escalator was never 10% that I know of.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 12:27 PM   #4408
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
There are of course lots of things a country could do to fix a fundamentally broken health care system.
Completely agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
We could look at successful European models and implement certain aspects as 'trials' to see if they would work.
Completely agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Work with staff members in specific areas to implement some of their recommendations on a small scale, and level up as needed.
Completely agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Do targeted funding increases to clear wait lists. I.E. where in Canada is the wait list for heart surgeries the longest? Work with that hospital to process through patients faster.
As long as “quality of care” is a shared metric with “clearing wait lists”, I agree. Dummy example: It is easy to rack up the most phone calls if each call is 2 seconds long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Fun times as a country. About to get even funner with as obesity further tears down the system.
Completely agree. Cancer too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
That problem is easily solved by only allowing non-profits to operate within our health care system.

I wonder what other country does this.....
Why are you being such a jerk?

I completely agree about limiting who can set up shop… although “non-profit” isn’t always truly non-profit.
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 07:36 PM   #4409
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1623505834184433664
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 07:44 PM   #4410
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

^^^ so?
Wormius is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 08:25 PM   #4411
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Within hours of Tait accusing Poilievre of “CBC bashing,” inciting attacks on the public broadcaster and calling his campaign to defund the CBC a fundraising slogan (which it is, along with an election promise), the Conservatives were out with a fundraising email giving Poilievre’s response.

Tait even did them the favour of directly referring to what Poilievre says about the CBC.

“There’s a lot of CBC bashing going on — somewhat stoked by the Leader of the Opposition” Tait told the Globe. “I think they feel the CBC is a mouthpiece for the Liberal government.”
That's it?
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 08:48 PM   #4412
Looch City
Looooooooooooooch
 
Looch City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Lol give him a break guys, it’s hard finding good troll content this week with his dear saviour’s relentless embarrassments.
Looch City is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 08:48 PM   #4413
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

PP: “The CBC is bad!”

CBC: “You seem to think the CBC is bad.”

PP: “OH MY GOD did you see that? THE CBC JUST BASHED ME! THE CBC SAID I SAID THEY WERE BAD!!! THEY ARE TOTALLY BIASED AGAINST ME!”


Can we just hurry up with the next election so voters can reject this total dork and his little band of loud, annoying supporters? We know CPC voters are just going to panic and boot him out anyway, so let’s get to it.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 02-08-2023, 08:58 PM   #4414
Yamer
Franchise Player
 
Yamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Red Deer
Exp:
Default

Please stop engaging with that member.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey."
-'Badger' Bob Johnson (1931-1991)

"I see as much misery out of them moving to justify theirselves as them that set out to do harm."
-Dr. Amos "Doc" Cochran
Yamer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yamer For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2023, 06:14 AM   #4415
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
That's it?
This part of the the article was spot on

“ The problem is, she walked into what a newspaper publisher rightly described to me years ago as, “six minutes of satisfaction, followed by six miles of bad road,” in this case for CBC journalists, particularly on Parliament Hill.”

Can’t wait till the plug gets pulled on this liberal mouthpiece media hopefully she helped speed up the process.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 06:38 AM   #4416
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

i feel like the CBC TV media is very liberal friendly; however, it seems like on their website you are more likely to see some articles that are a little more critical of the liberals; however, that being said, i will note that i dislike trudeau, and my viewpoint may be biased and i also don't watch a lot of CBC news or look at their website on a regular basis

i feel like there is still a mandate and spot for the CBC though and i am not generally supportive of pulling the plug on it
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 01:03 PM   #4417
Geraldsh
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Exp:
Default

I would say CBC is government friendly because that’s where the money comes from. They appear liberal friendly now because that’s who is in power. If any other party wins and looks able to hold their seats you would see a shift in the slanted opinions.
Geraldsh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 07:11 PM   #4418
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geraldsh View Post
I would say CBC is government friendly because that’s where the money comes from. They appear liberal friendly now because that’s who is in power. If any other party wins and looks able to hold their seats you would see a shift in the slanted opinions.
I think it’s more the demographics of journalists skews toward college education, CBC also ensures its journalist reflect the population so you have representative samples of men, women, whites indigenous and other POCs. The White name is over represented in conservatives. College educated skew more left.

So if you look at the demos of the CBC you are going to be further left than the average Canadian population.

You might ask why corporate owned news doesn’t skew this way and the answer would be advertisers and the other interests of the owners.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 07:31 PM   #4419
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think it’s more the demographics of journalists skews toward college education, CBC also ensures its journalist reflect the population so you have representative samples of men, women, whites indigenous and other POCs. The White name is over represented in conservatives. College educated skew more left.

So if you look at the demos of the CBC you are going to be further left than the average Canadian population.

You might ask why corporate owned news doesn’t skew this way and the answer would be advertisers and the other interests of the owners.
There are lots of well educated right leaning journalist nice try though.

You’ve swung and missed on the higher learning things a few times.

Give some evidence if you want to keep pushing that narrative.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2023, 07:33 PM   #4420
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
Give some evidence if you want to keep pushing that narrative.
Give some evidence for any narrative you've ever pushed. Don't assign homework if you won't do yours.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy