Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2025, 11:25 PM   #421
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Yeah, he's propped up by Dahlin when you watch him play., That's not to say he couldn't become more, but as of right now he needs a star D-man as an anchor not be underwater analytically, will require a new, likely expensive, long term contract, and based on reports requires a significant acquisition cost from a Flames team that just started shedding assets last season in this rebuild/retool or whatever they're calling it.

This is not the move to be making now at all. Be more patient and see what comes from some drafting.

Last edited by jayswin; 07-02-2025 at 11:28 PM.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 07-02-2025, 11:25 PM   #422
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Farabee + pospisil +Mews let's go




No way i move zary for Byram
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 07-02-2025, 11:37 PM   #423
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

My guess is that Kevyn Adams is gun shy about the reaction of deals he had made in the past, therefore he is waiting for the Friday afternoon news dump to make the trade.

So my prediction is that 3pm MST on Friday, a Byram trade comes down. Don’t know if it is to the Flames, but Adams will do whatever he can to avoid the media negativity.
Incogneto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 12:23 AM   #424
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Man you can keep saying this but by no metric other than being drafted 4th overall has Byram shown he should be part of this core.
But.

He could very well be the start of a core. Not sure what you see but there is no core, yet. Just a bunch of old guys and a bunch of young guys. It's almost disappointing that none of the young guys have stepped up and took the team on its shoulders a little bit.

Wolf is the one and where you start. He can't be the Captain but he is truly a leader. That kids hide is as thick as his last name, but he's on an island. Calgary had a leader until Giordano told him 'hey, don't do that." Look at that guy now. Winning cups and ####.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 03:05 AM   #425
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
It really isn't an exaggeration at all. Byram has been brutally underwater for years, even when he was in Colorado. It's just bad all around.

You can debate the merits of these kinds of numbers but for a supposed offensive defenceman he doesn't generate much offense on his own. And when he wasn't with Dahlin this past year it was just a total trainwreck.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1932904224020480145

I don't know if this is true, but it could be true. And I think that's enough to be a pass from me. You have to give up assets for this guy and then sign him to a long term and expensive cap hit.

The flames aren't in a rush to source a long-term top-4 defense option. The team can and should wait for a better top 4 defenseman to come along. What happens if the flames suck in 2025-26 and come the draft the BPA is a franchise, left shot defenseman? What if a left shot top-4 defenseman wants to come to Calgary as a discount in UFA?

Don't blow your wad too early
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 05:16 AM   #426
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

I actually see a lot of Rasmus in Byram when he skates the puck out. A little of Hanifin in the lack of a shot from the blueline, combined with the ability to get lost in coverage as he moves up to the circles. His wrist shot is better than either Andersson's or Hanifin's IMO.

Offense: Byram is pretty good at skating the puck out, or even leading the rush. His skating is great, and his finishing, especially on breakaways, is elite for a defenseman. He gets a lot of his goals by going to straight to the net, or off the rush when a teammate finds him as the trailer. That's why most of his goals are from the slot or the face off circles. Just don't expect a booming shot off the blue line that beats goalies from there. As far as his play making, I don't think he generates much as a passer, most of it comes from quickly taking the puck up the ice. I don't think Byram is a great PP guy, again, he's kind of like Andersson in that regard.

Defense: He mostly defends with his stick, which comes back to bite him occasionally when a forward gets positioning on him. He gets puck watching from time to time, standing still covering no one on his side of the net while the play develops elsewhere, but that could be a BUF system thing. In fact, I question his decision-making/compete from time to time since as long as he is covering his man he is more than content standing still, no matter how big of a grade A chance against is developing. He's also not great at blocking shots. He sort of attempts to get between the puck and the net, but he looks small when he does it, and he gets stuck in no-mans-land as a result. I think he's decent at denying zone entries with possession, but average at puck retrievals. Don't expect too much rough staff after the whistles, or him to initiate it. He's also average at the net front battles. His skating definitely helps in limiting rush chances against, and odd man rushes against. He reminds me a lot of Zadorov in the way he positions himself defensively, and how he reacts to plays, minus the big hits of course.

So yeah, he has a lot to work on defensively. I'm not sure how much of it has to do with the way BUF plays, but they have a lot of breakdowns defensively, and a lot of chances against. I question how well he sees the plays develop defensively, and if that can be changed.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:16 AM   #427
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

If you get Byram, it's not for his defensive prowess. Byram is a points guy and he's still young enough that he can develop his defensive game. Having solid goaltending will also hide a lot of mistakes.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:18 AM   #428
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Also, people are forgetting how good this coaching staff is at developing the defensive side of a defenseman's game. Weegar has actually improved a lot since joining the team, as did Bahl. Hanley looks like a top 4 here. That's not an accident.

If Byram is willing to learn, he'll do just fine. It's the rest of his game that's hard to find, so that's why you go out and get him.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:19 AM   #429
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

A trade proposal I saw on the Sabres and Flames Reddit seems like it might be a fair deal

To Flames: Byram and Krebs
To Sabres: Zary, Mews, Pospisil

Not sure how I feel about it to be honest.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:28 AM   #430
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
A trade proposal I saw on the Sabres and Flames Reddit seems like it might be a fair deal

To Flames: Byram and Krebs
To Sabres: Zary, Mews, Pospisil

Not sure how I feel about it to be honest.

Too fair for Buffalo. Buffalo keep Krebs, we keep Zary. Adjusted.


I'm not thrilled about Byram, personally. Rather get a prospect.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:30 AM   #431
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Byram to me is a very poor man's version of Evan Bouchard. At least with Evan Bouchard you are getting elite offensive production to offset the fact he's a poor defender. With Byram you are getting merely average offensive production from a poor defender as he's closer to Kylington than he is to Bouchard. I just feel the risk is not worth the reward as there's nothing about this player that screams elite or better than average save for his skating.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:31 AM   #432
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTech780 View Post
I am pretty sure Calgary’s analytics department is one of the best in the league, so either their advanced stats say something different or Conroy isn’t listening to them. Based on the way the last few drafts have gone, I would say he listens to the analytics department.
Couldn’t relocate it but there was another comment or two that Byram has been propped up by Dahlin.

To your point though, not only do the Flames have a great analytics department, I’m fairly confident that the Flames have also given quite a bit of thought to where and who Byram would play with. If the trade does happen, as well as the inevitable Andersson trade, you’re looking at:

Byram-Weegar
Bahl-Parekh
Hanley-Pachal

Not a bad top 4, IMO. ‘Propped up’ to me is a somewhat redundant/meaningless term. How many D-men league wide don’t benefit from their partner? As bad as we like to think some of them are, very few offer nothing or next to nothing and I would have a real hard time believing Byram was one of them.

All that said, I’m not including any pick in the first two rounds for Byram. If there’s a player for player deal, I’m a lot more interested.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:42 AM   #433
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo Jr. View Post
I'd be nauseous if we moved Zary.

Stop.
I don't want them to move Zary either but you have to give up quality to get quality back and there's been rumors for a while that Buffalo has had interest in Zary. I'd very much prefer that they just trade Ras for the best package they can get, sign Zary to a bridge and roll with what they have for the season
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:43 AM   #434
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Too fair for Buffalo. Buffalo keep Krebs, we keep Zary. Adjusted.


I'm not thrilled about Byram, personally. Rather get a prospect.
I doubt Mews-Posposil gets it done.

Mews is, what two years away at least? Buffalo likely wants players now. If Byram has concussion concerns I’d say Posposil has more given the way he plays.

Believe Mews has not yet signed, right? Would Buffalo consider him a flight risk? Pretty sure Buffalo isn’t going to make this move without a controlled assets coming back.

Bruztewicz-Posposil might be more realistic.

Last edited by TOfan; 07-03-2025 at 06:52 AM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:47 AM   #435
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

So far Ive read how good he is with Dahlin, how bad he is with Dahlin, and how he may or may not have contributed to the Avs cup win.

His analytics are bad, his analytics don't tell the whole story.

Nobody here knows what he is.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2025, 06:51 AM   #436
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Couldn’t relocate it but there was another comment or two that Byram has been propped up by Dahlin.

To your point though, not only do the Flames have a great analytics department, I’m fairly confident that the Flames have also given quite a bit of thought to where and who Byram would play with. If the trade does happen, as well as the inevitable Andersson trade, you’re looking at:

Byram-Weegar
Bahl-Parekh
Hanley-Pachal

Not a bad top 4, IMO. ‘Propped up’ to me is a somewhat redundant/meaningless term. How many D-men league wide don’t benefit from their partner? As bad as we like to think some of them are, very few offer nothing or next to nothing and I would have a real hard time believing Byram was one of them.

All that said, I’m not including any pick in the first two rounds for Byram. If there’s a player for player deal, I’m a lot more interested.
The stats say stay away from Byram, but he is a 23-year-old D (last season) who was stuck behind elite D and has battled injuries. Not all D are Makar, Orr or Doughty. It's quite common that superstar D take a few years to develop and more are average 23 years old and younger and 24 is a age that we could see a huge step from Byram, especially considering the missed games early in his career.

I see his ceiling being better than Anderson and likely will just be a good D in the range of Ras or Hanifin.

If the contract is similar to their ask and we can add him without giving up a 1st (Buffalo doesn't want them anyways), we should be all over this.

Other than Parekh, we do not have any other D prospect that is a top 50 calibre prospect. We have Weegar, Hanley, Pachal who are over 30 or just depth players. I like our D as a whole, but we are not loaded to the point where adding Byram doesn't make sense.

Unless Zary moves to center, he can be involved in this trade as we are no question loaded on the wing. D and C are the most important position when building, we add Byram, and we could be landing a star that hasn't broke out yet.

With Frost signing, I just don't see Zary at center unless we have injuries.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:55 AM   #437
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Let’s take back Samuelsson to reduce the acquisition cost. Plus St Louis doesn’t have the cap to help Buffalo out that way.

Have to wonder if Zary remaining rfa means he’s part of the deal. But all for acquiring elite talent, which Byram seems to be. Some red flags for sure (concussion), but worth the risk. A lot of people here wanting to tank to get young elite talent, but here’s an opportunity to do that instead of rolling the dice in the draft lottery for the chance to acquire a good high ceiling player. All aboard the Byram train!
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 06:59 AM   #438
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
*facepalm*

Coronato is a 22 year old who just scored 24 goals in his sophomore season (although his rookie season was just 34 games). He's likely to become a perennial 30 goal scorer and he's complementary in your eyes?

Damn, you're a hard sell.
To use the most recent Cup champions for reference, Coronato is Verhaeghe. Really good player. But if he's one of the top five guys on your roster, you're not a contender.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 07:07 AM   #439
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Let’s take back Samuelsson to reduce the acquisition cost. Plus St Louis doesn’t have the cap to help Buffalo out that way.

Have to wonder if Zary remaining rfa means he’s part of the deal.
But all for acquiring elite talent, which Byram seems to be. Some red flags for sure (concussion), but worth the risk. A lot of people here wanting to tank to get young elite talent, but here’s an opportunity to do that instead of rolling the dice in the draft lottery for the chance to acquire a good high ceiling player. All aboard the Byram train!
Also something that should not be overlooked in all this, IMO.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2025, 07:08 AM   #440
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
To use the most recent Cup champions for reference, Coronato is Verhaeghe. Really good player. But if he's one of the top five guys on your roster, you're not a contender.
Maybe he's Verhaghe...maybe he's Reinhart.

I don't think we know yet
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy