Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2019, 05:56 PM   #421
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
You dump two contracts you want to get rid of and get the best player in the deal?

Jersey takes on Froliks contract AND 50% of Brodie together? Seems like Jerseys purpose in this trade is just to help the Flames. They don't get much out of it.

Of the Flames deal was true in guessing it was likely Brodie and Bennet. Jankowski and Kerfoot are not even close.
Brodie is arguably the best player in the deal. Kadri has the better contract but the top pairing D is more valuable than the 2nd line C
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-07-2019, 06:43 PM   #422
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
You dump two contracts you want to get rid of and get the best player in the deal?

Jersey takes on Froliks contract AND 50% of Brodie together? Seems like Jerseys purpose in this trade is just to help the Flames. They don't get much out of it.

Of the Flames deal was true in guessing it was likely Brodie and Bennet. Jankowski and Kerfoot are not even close.
Well the rumour from Friedman is jersey was in on frolik for a late pick, so getting him essentially free is a better deal than what is rumoured to be on the table. It's further incentive to want to take part of Brodie's salary. Frolik + Brown is better than just Connor brown and more in line with what I think might convince jersey to pay money for a player not playing for them.

That's kind of what I'm struggling with, Brown does not seem like enough of a return for ~2 million on cash/cap. Maybe the 3rd Toronto dealt to Colorado would've gone to Jersey.

Or maybe it was more like

Calgary: kadri
Toronto: Brodie
Jersey: Brown, jankowski, Brodie 50%
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2019, 07:01 PM   #423
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Or maybe it was more like

Calgary: kadri
Toronto: Brodie
Jersey: Brown, jankowski, Brodie 50%
Calgary gets raped in that deal. Massively.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2019, 07:23 PM   #424
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Calgary gets raped in that deal. Massively.
It's not really rape if there's written consent.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 07-07-2019, 07:32 PM   #425
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Calgary gets raped in that deal. Massively.
This isnt any different than the deal that is rumoured to almost have been completed except jersey gets janko instead of Toronto.

Maybe we could also find terminology for a lopsided professional sports trade besides 'rape'.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
Old 07-07-2019, 07:52 PM   #426
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Calgary gets raped in that deal. Massively.
Cringe.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-07-2019, 10:53 PM   #427
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Brodie is arguably the best player in the deal. Kadri has the better contract but the top pairing D is more valuable than the 2nd line C
Brodie was a #2 and a #5 in a game. Hard to gauge what he is now. I'd say a solid 2nd pairing guy at this point.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:36 AM   #428
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Long thread and maybe it is mentioned but Kadri and Rosen and a 3rd got traded for Barrie and Kerfoot.

Barrie is equal to Brodie, Kerfoot is pretty much at the same point as Elias Lindholm was when Carolina included him in the Hamilton trade.


What asset could of the Flames included with Brodie to make the trade as good for the Leafs as the Avs offer?


Bennett? Ryan? IMHO that would be a stretch compared to Kerfoot
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:37 AM   #429
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Long thread and maybe it is mentioned but Kadri and Rosen and a 3rd got traded for Barrie and Kerfoot.

Barrie is equal to Brodie, Kerfoot is pretty much at the same point as Elias Lindholm was when Carolina included him in the Hamilton trade.


What asset could of the Flames included with Brodie to make the trade as good for the Leafs as the Avs offer?


Bennett? Ryan? IMHO that would be a stretch compared to Kerfoot
Rumour was Jankowski was the add in. I agree though, Kadri ended up doing Toronto a favour by not waiving his NTC, they definitely got a better deal from the Avs
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:38 AM   #430
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Long thread and maybe it is mentioned but Kadri and Rosen and a 3rd got traded for Barrie and Kerfoot.

Barrie is equal to Brodie, Kerfoot is pretty much at the same point as Elias Lindholm was when Carolina included him in the Hamilton trade.


What asset could of the Flames included with Brodie to make the trade as good for the Leafs as the Avs offer?


Bennett? Ryan? IMHO that would be a stretch compared to Kerfoot
I'm sorry, what?
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2019, 08:45 AM   #431
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I'm sorry, what?
Two 40 point seasons as a 2nd line C?

Lindholm had 4, but still fairly similar.

If kerfoot gets top line minutes as Lindholm did I could see a big breakout.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:48 AM   #432
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Long thread and maybe it is mentioned but Kadri and Rosen and a 3rd got traded for Barrie and Kerfoot.

Barrie is equal to Brodie, Kerfoot is pretty much at the same point as Elias Lindholm was when Carolina included him in the Hamilton trade.


What asset could of the Flames included with Brodie to make the trade as good for the Leafs as the Avs offer?


Bennett? Ryan? IMHO that would be a stretch compared to Kerfoot
The deal that seems to be known at this stage was:

To Calgary: Brown, Kadri
To Toronto: Brodie, Jankowski

To 3rd Team: Brown
To Calgary: Unknown return

This trade was reportedly nixed by Kadri using his NTC, so Toronto and Calgary had come to an agreement with the pieces above.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:52 AM   #433
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Talked to a big Leafs fan yesterday (he's otherwise a perfectly normal guy) who figured Kadri did the Leafs a huge favour because the return from the deal they ended up withw as much better. He figured Brodie isn't what the Leafs need at all (he and I agreed Hamonic is what they really need).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:59 AM   #434
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Two 40 point seasons as a 2nd line C?

Lindholm had 4, but still fairly similar.

If kerfoot gets top line minutes as Lindholm did I could see a big breakout.
I think you could argue Kerfoot has overachieved, while Lindholm had been underachieving though.

Kerfoot is also 4 months older than Lindholm (now, not at the time of the trade).
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:59 AM   #435
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Two 40 point seasons as a 2nd line C?

Lindholm had 4, but still fairly similar.

If kerfoot gets top line minutes as Lindholm did I could see a big breakout.
There is still the fact Kerfoot was a 5th round pick and Lindholm was a 5th overall pick so viewing them at 23/24 as the same value is another example of brutal logic from a poster that is famous for it.

Just like your guy Puljujarvi. Do he and Mangipane have the same value in a trade? Mangipane scores twice as many goals in 2 less games last year but I would think league wide JP would still hold significantly more value in a trade.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 08:59 AM   #436
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
I think you could argue Kerfoot has overachieved, while Lindholm had been underachieving though.

Kerfoot is also 4 months older than Lindholm (now, not at the time of the trade).
They age differently?!
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2019, 09:02 AM   #437
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
I think you could argue Kerfoot has overachieved, while Lindholm had been underachieving though.

Kerfoot is also 4 months older than Lindholm (now, not at the time of the trade).
You could argue anything.

You could even argue that Kerfoot could be more productive if he was slotted with linemates the calibre of Gaudreau and Monahan.

Perhaps he would then over-overachieve
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 09:11 AM   #438
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Long thread and maybe it is mentioned but Kadri and Rosen and a 3rd got traded for Barrie and Kerfoot.

Barrie is equal to Brodie, Kerfoot is pretty much at the same point as Elias Lindholm was when Carolina included him in the Hamilton trade.

What asset could of the Flames included with Brodie to make the trade as good for the Leafs as the Avs offer?

Bennett? Ryan? IMHO that would be a stretch compared to Kerfoot
I’m confused.

Alexander Kerfoot recorded only three assists in thirteen playoff games, which by your upside-down metrics would make him utterly worthless.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project

Last edited by Textcritic; 07-08-2019 at 09:23 AM.
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2019, 09:25 AM   #439
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
They age differently?!
Kerfoot has the Benjamin Button disease.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2019, 09:27 AM   #440
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Brodie is arguably the best player in the deal. Kadri has the better contract but the top pairing D is more valuable than the 2nd line C
3 years of Kadri at a very good cap hit is worth way more than 1 year of Brodie with a good cap hit.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy