Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Pick your top five selection list
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 44 8.21%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 118 22.01%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 56 10.45%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Bennett 4 0.75%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 21 3.92%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 10 1.87%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 22 4.10%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Reinhart 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 27 5.04%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 9 1.68%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 85 15.86%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 41 7.65%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl-Bennett 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Bennett-Draisaitl 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Ekblad-Bennett 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 19 3.54%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 8 1.49%
Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 9 1.68%
Bennett-Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 12 2.24%
Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 5 0.93%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 6 1.12%
Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 4 0.75%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Reinhart-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Reinhart 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle 3 0.56%
Voters: 536. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2014, 07:15 PM   #421
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'd bet the sabres would take Reinhart over Ekblad anyway but if we finished with the5th pic and the oilers finished lower than I'd give whatever it takes other than monahan to move up
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 07:23 PM   #422
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
This, exactly.

If the Flames are picking first, go with Reinhart or Dal Colle over Ekblad.

If the Flames are picking 4th and Ekblad is on the board, go with him.

It's all about relative value. Both Dal Colle and Reinhart are in the same ball park potential wise as Ekblad, so I'd take the two forwards over the D because the forwards are more guaranteed to reach their potential. However, if you're past that point where you're choosing between Draisaitl/Bennett and Ekblad, you go with Eks because his upside is higher.

You saw this last year, where all of Jones, Mac, Barkov, and Drouin were in the same ballpark potential wise as they all looked like top end 1st line talent. The three forwards all went first. Lindholm/Monahan/Nichushkin though all had some question marks on their overall potential, and were a step down from the other forwards, so despite the Preds already have a lot of good defensemen in their system, took Jones because he was the best relative to the place they were picking even though their forward group is worse than ours currently.
I don't think any scout is going to say 'ah these guys are all the same' potential wise. They are going to like who they like. You should take the guy you like best and not worry about history. Its a mistake to say well we like Ekblad a bit better but the history says he's more likely to bust so we'll take Reinhart.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2014, 08:57 PM   #423
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Healy says Burke personally scouted Ekbkad the other night
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2014, 08:57 PM   #424
Ring of Fire
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ring of Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

CBC Panel said Burke was watching Ekblad tonight.

EDIT: that was lightning quick...sure loss cannot be beat.
Ring of Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 09:01 PM   #425
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Healy says Burke personally scouted Ekbkad the other night
That can't possibly be true. I've heard from credible sources that Burke is too busy with the US Olympic team to do anything GM related.

Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 09:08 PM   #426
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Burke must be racking up some serious airline reward points these last couple of months.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 09:08 PM   #427
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

oh BUTLER PP ALERT!

EDIT: I'm drunk.

Last edited by PeteMoss; 01-11-2014 at 09:11 PM.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 10:37 PM   #428
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
I don't think any scout is going to say 'ah these guys are all the same' potential wise.
Here is a screenshot of the Blue Jackets list from the past draft... they have grouped a bunch of players into different priorities. Safe to say they thought they were all the similar potential wise:

Spoiler!


Defining tiers/priorities/etc is a valuable tool when deciding whether you should trade down or up.

Last edited by sureLoss; 01-11-2014 at 10:40 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2014, 10:39 PM   #429
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Aaron Ekblad has four goals in the first 33 minutes tonight for Barrie.

we should get him just for the safeway million dollar score and win possibility
That's sick.

We waants. We neeeeds.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 11:43 PM   #430
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Here is a screenshot of the Blue Jackets list from the past draft... they have grouped a bunch of players into different priorities. Safe to say they thought they were all the similar potential wise:

Spoiler!


Defining tiers/priorities/etc is a valuable tool when deciding whether you should trade down or up.
I'm sure they rank them in tiers.. but they also have numbers beside them of where they rank them.

I'd also argue that the lower you get in the draft the more likely you are to find similarly ranked guys... but when you're in the top 5 you need to find the one you like the best.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-12-2014, 12:02 AM   #431
c.t.ner
First Line Centre
 
c.t.ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Here is a screenshot of the Blue Jackets list from the past draft... they have grouped a bunch of players into different priorities. Safe to say they thought they were all the similar potential wise:

Defining tiers/priorities/etc is a valuable tool when deciding whether you should trade down or up.
Interesting to see Petan in the 'special' category. He was one of the players, I was hoping the Flames would be able to steal in the draft.
c.t.ner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 12:07 AM   #432
icecube
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
Exp:
Default

We don't know what they even meant by "special".
icecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 12:11 AM   #433
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
I don't think any scout is going to say 'ah these guys are all the same' potential wise. They are going to like who they like. You should take the guy you like best and not worry about history. Its a mistake to say well we like Ekblad a bit better but the history says he's more likely to bust so we'll take Reinhart.
It's all about making tiers and separating guys into rough potential groups, basically exactly what that spreadsheet from the Jackets above.

Last year, the Panthers really liked Barkov more so than either Drouin or Jones. The Lightning also preferred the forward over the D-man. That doesn't mean that the Flames would take Reinhart over Ekblad for sure. It would depend on what the scouts say. If they feel Ekblad is going to be all that and then some, by all means take him.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 08:20 AM   #434
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Healy says Burke personally scouted Ekbkad the other night
As in he was there for the 4 goal performance? I guarantee Burke does everything he can to draft Ekblad... It could be eerily similar to the 1993 draft.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 09:27 AM   #435
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icecube View Post
We don't know what they even meant by "special".
that has to be a carryover from the Howsen days (which he obviously brought over from Edmonton). Essentially small skilled player.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 02:40 PM   #436
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Ekblad would be great for the Flames. If you can think of a perfect guy to pair with what Ekblad brings, it would be TJ Brodie

Sutter had him playing with Pouliout at the WJ's. They were a much better pairing than Dumba/Reinhart
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 03:54 PM   #437
bucksmasher
Scoring Winger
 
bucksmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

way to go Buffalo!
bucksmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 04:37 PM   #438
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Flames are closer to 30th than 27th now thanks to this horrible January. I do think the chances of drafting in the top 2 is very likely. I really hope we get Ekblad but would be happy with Reinhart I get the feeling if Burke wants Ekblad he will get him unless Edmonton picks 1st
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 04:38 PM   #439
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

Once the Flames ship off some or all of Stempniak, Stajan, and Cammalleri, the team will make a strong push for last place. It's shaping up to look like the Flamess will win the lottery (take Ekblad), or lose the lottery and draft 2nd overall and draft whomever Buffalo doesn't (Reinhart or Ekblad). I'm pretty confident the Flames will end up with one of those two.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2014, 04:44 PM   #440
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Kind of hoping the Flames win the Lottery and by default get two first round picks with NJ having to forfeit theirs. May not be a DEEP draft but whenever you can throw more high end mud at the wall the better.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy