05-18-2015, 02:16 AM
|
#4302
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Is that Quebec City?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 02:26 AM
|
#4303
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
|
yes
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 02:30 AM
|
#4304
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Is that Quebec City?
|
Nice of the OP to put a caption, It must be though, look at the french seats!
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 02:35 AM
|
#4305
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
Nice of the OP to put a caption, It must be though, look at the french seats!
|
I did say "Ooh la la" when I saw it.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-18-2015, 08:59 AM
|
#4306
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-18-2015, 09:20 AM
|
#4307
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: YYC-ish
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler
|
The only thing I could think of...
|
|
|
05-18-2015, 11:03 AM
|
#4308
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
What do you mean by "pitch from the city"?
I don't believe there's been any pitch from the city. It's been a one-way street so far with the Flames presenting their proposal to the Mayor and speaking publicly about the need for a new building. So far, the city's position (or at least what the Mayor has said publicly) is that Calgary doesn't need a new arena, and if the Flames want to build one because it will improve their bottom-line, they should be paying for it themselves.
|
Related to this article. Council/Mayor share what they feel would be a fair compensation from the city's side. Many consider giving the land as the city's concession. (The other new arena thread had lots of discussion related to this article /Nov '14)
http://calgaryherald.com/news/local-...land-for-arena
|
|
|
06-01-2015, 11:02 PM
|
#4309
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Springfield
|
|
|
|
06-01-2015, 11:37 PM
|
#4310
|
Franchise Player
|
I appreciate that Nenshi and the Herald coordinated this update for a Monday.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-01-2015, 11:59 PM
|
#4311
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
"The proposed site is “very problematic,” Nenshi said, without providing details."
This seems to be new information. Referring to the cost of clean-up for West Village? Not a good start if the city and Flames can't even agree to a location.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 12:56 AM
|
#4312
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
The traffic flow is also a nightmare, and the Sunalta LRT station isn't well-suited for a ton of traffic.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 02:20 AM
|
#4313
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway
The traffic flow is also a nightmare, and the Sunalta LRT station isn't well-suited for a ton of traffic.
|
If the rumors of a huge complex for football, hockey and probability of hotel/mall etc. are true I wouldn't want to live anywhere near that place. We are talking years of construction for new roadways/overpasses and probably 100's of millions.
I wouldn't blame Nenshi one bit if he turns them down. A complex of this size needs to go where there's lots of room and doesn't need crazy road work for the people who actually live around it.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 07:56 AM
|
#4314
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
If the rumors of a huge complex for football, hockey and probability of hotel/mall etc. are true I wouldn't want to live anywhere near that place. We are talking years of construction for new roadways/overpasses and probably 100's of millions.
I wouldn't blame Nenshi one bit if he turns them down. A complex of this size needs to go where there's lots of room and doesn't need crazy road work for the people who actually live around it.
|
As someone who does live near the proposed area, I'll gladly put up with some short term pain to finally have something done about the horrible section of Crowchild North of 17th to Memorial and 14th Street from 12th Ave to Memorial.
|
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
|
14,
BeltlineFan,
calculoso,
Daryei,
DoubleK,
Grimbl420,
Jay Random,
jayswin,
lambeburger,
mikeecho,
MrMastodonFarm,
Muta,
OBCT,
PatRiggin,
surferguy
|
06-02-2015, 08:12 AM
|
#4315
|
broke the first rule
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
"The proposed site is “very problematic,” Nenshi said, without providing details."
This seems to be new information. Referring to the cost of clean-up for West Village? Not a good start if the city and Flames can't even agree to a location.
|
I might be optimistic, but I took it more as the area provides huge logistical challenges for all sides to work through, not necessarily that they don't agree on a location.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to calf For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-02-2015, 08:35 AM
|
#4316
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
As someone who does live near the proposed area, I'll gladly put up with some short term pain to finally have something done about the horrible section of Crowchild North of 17th to Memorial and 14th Street from 12th Ave to Memorial.
|
That's the thing exactly.
iNobody lives in the West Village now – the closest residential area is separated from it by the CPR tracks – and the crazy road work desperately needs to be done, whether anything new is built in the area or not. The existing configuration of Bow, Crowchild, and 14th St. was designed and built in the late 1960s, evidently by somebody who had never seen an interchange before, but was thoroughly stoned and hallucinated how it ought to be done. Worse, they did it without allowing any room at all to add extra lanes. The city has tripled in size since then, and traffic in that area has more than tripled.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#4317
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
|
That's the conundrum. The best locations for an arena, stadium, and entertainment district are going to require some creative use of the land and improvements to infrastructure. If the Flames wanted to build an arena in the middle of nowhere, they would have bought up some farmland near Balzac and it would have been built by now. Cheaper, easier, but infinitely more horrible.
Corporate seats and boxes are too important of a revenue source to the organization to have it anywhere but in or very near downtown. And that means that any suitable location will be "problematic" in some way, which does set the stage nicely for indirect contributions from three levels of government in the form of infrastructure upgrades.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 09:38 AM
|
#4318
|
Could Care Less
|
If Nenshi is so big on inner city development and increasing density, he should put his money where his mouth is and support the redevelopment of that entire west side prime downtown land area of which an arena/fieldhouse is a great anchor tenant.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-02-2015, 09:44 AM
|
#4319
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
If Nenshi is so big on inner city development and increasing density, he should put his money where his mouth is and support the redevelopment of that entire west side prime downtown land area of which an arena/fieldhouse is a great anchor tenant.
|
Declining one idea doesn't mean there aren't others. I'd imagine the city has their own ideas about the west end.
|
|
|
06-02-2015, 09:48 AM
|
#4320
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Declining one idea doesn't mean there aren't others. I'd imagine the city has their own ideas about the west end.
|
They sure do:
http://www.realestateforums.com/calg...thias_tita.pdf
And yet there it sits. Probably because no developer will touch it due to the contamination issues and clean-up costs. I'm sure the Flames would work with the city on that. Lost in all this is that people don't understand that eventually it will be a public-private partnership that gets this site developed, whether it's a developer or the Flames or both. But you won't see people up in arms about the city giving land to a private developer to get it going, for some reason.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM.
|
|