I think a big part of Drysaddle's is the whole 'the goalie had time to reset' argument. He bumped him, moved on, call it 1-2s, and then the puck is in.
*shrug*
From the gif they both look like they should have been disallowed.
The sky is blue, water’s wet, Oiler fans are delusional, Peluso was using Koskinens leg as a trampoline and the sun is hot.
One of these things is not a fact
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
THIS is why people make fun of Edmonton. When will this stupid city figure it out? They continue to kick their own ass every day, it's impossible not to make fun of them.
The Following User Says Thank You to Sutter_in_law For This Useful Post:
Sorry, when or where did you see this? Please provide me with video/picture proof. I haven't seen Peluso standing on anybody's leg.
4 seconds in on the clip I posted. Pelusos left skate is on top of Koskinen. It’s way more obvious it the front video. He steps down on it then lifts back up
4 seconds in on the clip I posted. Pelusos left skate is on top of Koskinen. It’s way more obvious it the front video. He steps down on it then lifts back up
I still don't see it. Do you have a link to a video showing another angle.
He lifts his leg to let the puck in, Koskinen extends his and their skates lightly touch.
Or in Stang’s universe Peluso tried to amputee Koskinens leg at the knee but was unsuccessful somehow
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
THIS is why people make fun of Edmonton. When will this stupid city figure it out? They continue to kick their own ass every day, it's impossible not to make fun of them.
You can see it more clearly @ 04:36 of this video...
It looks to me like the puck was passed them/in the process of passing them when Peluso's skate came down on Koskinen's for that fraction of a second. In my opinion, at that point in time it wouldn't have impeded Koskinen's chances of stopping the puck.
Different refs, whatever. This was challenged and went to Toronto, that’s where the true consistency is needed when they can look at it over and over from multiple angles
On a coach's challenge, the decision is made by the refs in the building. The Situation Room only provides them with the available replays.
The Situation Room makes the decision on whether or not the puck fully and legally crossed the goal line, including rulings on kicked-in goals and high stick goals. Once it goes to a challenge, it becomes the decision of the officials at the game. This is why you sometimes see two different reviews on the same goal.
They've talked about changing it so that all reviews are done out of Toronto, but they haven't had agreement on that yet.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
He lifts his leg to let the puck in, Koskinen extends his and their skates lightly touch.
Or in Stang’s universe Peluso tried to amputee Koskinens leg at the knee but was unsuccessful somehow
Their skates "lightly touch"?
Peluso's foot plants on top of Koskinen's skate. It is ridiculous to think you can gauge the pressure applied from these video clips, but even more so for some of you to continue to insist that contact by Draisaitl was patently obvious while Peluso's was barely noticeable.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
BOTH players make obvious contact with the goalies, and it is difficult to make clear judgments about the allowability of one goal over the other.
You should feel bad about making me point this out in the "Edmonton is no good" thread.
Im alright with Flames goal disallowed. I was when it happened.
I posted about this because just 2 days later the Oilers get away with basically the same goal. And ref even says "there was no goalie interference" when obviously there was.
The inconsistency of this league is incredible
The Following User Says Thank You to goflamesgo18 For This Useful Post:
Oh damn! Peluso had his skate in the air, which actually allowed Koskinen to get his pad over. Yeah sure, their blades touch but that's after it's in. I thought Peluso's left skate was planted the all the while, which would've impeded Koskinen's pad but that wasn't the case.
That actually looks more favorable for Calgary on that angle, if anything.
Can be argued for or against, but that's as much a goal as the Edmonton one.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Peluso's foot plants on top of Koskinen's skate. It is ridiculous to think you can gauge the pressure applied from these video clips, but even more so for some of you to continue to insist that contact by Draisaitl was patently obvious while Peluso's was barely noticeable.
At the time peluso made contact with koskinens skate, he could have amputated his foot and it would still count because the puck was already in the net. This part of the argument is ridiculous.
The Following User Says Thank You to goflamesgo18 For This Useful Post:
Comes down on koskinens skate after puck is in the net. Irrelevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff
It looks to me like the puck was passed them/in the process of passing them when Peluso's skate came down on Koskinen's for that fraction of a second. In my opinion, at that point in time it wouldn't have impeded Koskinen's chances of stopping the puck.
That's true. But prior to that and at the point that Koskinen extends his glove to make the save Peluso's right leg impedes him from doing so.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
Gotta love how Oilers fans bend the rules in their own minds for justifications. David Staples is a perfect representation of Oilers fans and their logic.
