07-16-2021, 09:04 AM
|
#401
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
If Bean were available for cheap, I would be fine with exposing both Tanev and Gio.
Tanev would go down as a 1 year UFA signing win. Tough to see him leave, but having both Bean and Gio would be better, both short term and long term. Plus there would still be some cap savings.
Bean is basically another Valimaki. Same age, production, draft position. Valimaki is probably better defensively. But I think Bean has more offensive upside.
Last edited by 1qqaaz; 07-16-2021 at 09:08 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:04 AM
|
#402
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
|
I would think trades will happen today, if they can't find a trade with Seattle
(i.e. like the Ryan Graves trade)
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:09 AM
|
#403
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
|
Yes it sucks but well run teams like the Hurricanes draft well and don't trade their draft picks are always going to be more susceptible much like the Ducks last expansion draft. I assume they feel they are better off just keeping their 1st round pick than trading it for Bean. As for the Flames if Valimaki wasn't injured I assume both Tanev and Gio would be available so really not much changes for the Flames except they probably lose the better defenseman in Tanev.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:10 AM
|
#404
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Friedman on 960 saying speculation is that Seattle is asking for a 1st and a 3rd to not pick a player. Even if it's just a 1st I can't see how the Flames could even consider that. Also says if the Kraken pick Gio that other teams will be inquiring about what it would take to acquire him. Sounds like the positives of taking Gio are so high that it's hard to imagine the Kraken backing down from their demands.
|
Trading Gio today is very hard due to the acquiring team needing to protect him.
Trading Gio after the expansion draft is a much easier, so I think what you've posted makes a ton of sense.
It's not really a question of Seattle bluffing or being greedy, it's likely based on Gio's value post expansion draft.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:10 AM
|
#405
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Friedman on 960 saying speculation is that Seattle is asking for a 1st and a 3rd to not pick a player. Even if it's just a 1st I can't see how the Flames could even consider that. Also says if the Kraken pick Gio that other teams will be inquiring about what it would take to acquire him. Sounds like the positives of taking Gio are so high that it's hard to imagine the Kraken backing down from their demands.
|
That’s an easy no. You can’t trade that much.
If the Flames feel they absolutely must keep Gio (I don’t agree), I think they should trade Hanifin or Tanev because Hanifin and Tanev should have high value after last season.
Last edited by Nelson; 07-16-2021 at 09:13 AM.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:16 AM
|
#406
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Trading Gio today is very hard due to the acquiring team needing to protect him.
Trading Gio after the expansion draft is a much easier, so I think what you've posted makes a ton of sense.
It's not really a question of Seattle bluffing or being greedy, it's likely based on Gio's value post expansion draft.
|
For sure, Ron Francis would not be doing his job correctly if he does not place pressure on each team within the league, he has to get maximum value.
If it was my call, I would definitely select Gio then move him at the deadline.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 09:24 AM
|
#407
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
|
Waddell should be fired immediately.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:03 AM
|
#408
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
If Bean were available for cheap, I would be fine with exposing both Tanev and Gio.
Tanev would go down as a 1 year UFA signing win. Tough to see him leave, but having both Bean and Gio would be better, both short term and long term. Plus there would still be some cap savings.
Bean is basically another Valimaki. Same age, production, draft position. Valimaki is probably better defensively. But I think Bean has more offensive upside.
|
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4
Expose Backlund and Giordano.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:04 AM
|
#409
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4
Expose Backlund and Giordano.
|
That pairs nicely with ‘exploring every avenue to keep Giordano’, haha
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:06 AM
|
#410
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
That pairs nicely with ‘exploring every avenue to keep Giordano’, haha
|
Yeah, it's not the best idea. Friday lunch hours...
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:21 AM
|
#411
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4
Expose Backlund and Giordano.
|
Mangiapane would get taken.
Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:22 AM
|
#412
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mt House
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Just thinking about this. If you take into account that, for good or ill, the Flames are in "win now " mode with Sutter, and you look at performance and contracts... I am exposing Rasmus. I think, with his skills, speed and offense in particular, he is a #4, and I don't like that contract much for a #4 d-man. Leave him exposed - I think he is much easier to replace for that price than Giordano is for his price. I don't mind being free of that contract, given what I have seen in terms of production/performance. This is strictly from the perspective of short-term success. Otherwise, I just let Giordano go and not worry about it.
|
There is no way you expose Rasmus Andersson. He would be an easy trade for good returns before you would even consider it.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:22 AM
|
#413
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
|
All of the GMs are backed into a corner.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:24 AM
|
#414
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike
Mangiapane would get taken.
Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
|
I like Monahan a lot and defend him from what I think are some unfair criticisms or inaccurate descriptions of his play. That said, I don't expose Mangiapane over him, due to age, health and contract considerations, plus plain old stats.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:24 AM
|
#415
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike
Mangiapane would get taken.
Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
|
Yeah, not sure how I missed that. Oh well, my bad idea got worse!
Ok, so Bean isn't going to happen. Dreamkiller
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:45 AM
|
#416
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4
Expose Backlund and Giordano.
|
Flames will go with the 7-3-1
Trades for another dman, won't happen until after the expansion draft if the Flames are trying to acquire.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:50 AM
|
#417
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yrebmi
There is no way you expose Rasmus Andersson. He would be an easy trade for good returns before you would even consider it.
|
Much prefer losing him than Hanifin, that much is for sure.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:54 AM
|
#418
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
|
Well any team with more than 3 defenseman or 8 skaters that are somewhat good is backed into a corner.
That's what an expansion draft is.
Certainly not the time for the guys not backed into a corner to start bragging about how thin they are.
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 10:58 AM
|
#419
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Honestly I wish they could find a way to keep Giordano.
I like the story.
And I like the chances of him going season to season into his 40s on one year deals and adding to the story.
But you can only pay so much for sentimentality.
And I'm honestly still curious how Tanev's contract plays out. I would surmise the vast majority of this site had him breaking into pieces after two years and having the Flames on the hook for his last two years as a face palm.
Does he play as well and stay as healthy in the next three?
|
|
|
07-16-2021, 11:00 AM
|
#420
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Well any team with more than 3 defenseman or 8 skaters that are somewhat good is backed into a corner.
That's what an expansion draft is.
Certainly not the time for the guys not backed into a corner to start bragging about how thin they are.
|
Which is why it boggles the mind a little that a non-contending, non-playoff team might be giving up such a high quality asset to expansion. Something wasn’t planned properly.
There are several teams better than the Flames who aren’t nearly as backed in to a corner.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 PM.
|
|