Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2021, 09:04 AM   #401
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

If Bean were available for cheap, I would be fine with exposing both Tanev and Gio.
Tanev would go down as a 1 year UFA signing win. Tough to see him leave, but having both Bean and Gio would be better, both short term and long term. Plus there would still be some cap savings.

Bean is basically another Valimaki. Same age, production, draft position. Valimaki is probably better defensively. But I think Bean has more offensive upside.

Last edited by 1qqaaz; 07-16-2021 at 09:08 AM.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 09:04 AM   #402
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
I would think trades will happen today, if they can't find a trade with Seattle

(i.e. like the Ryan Graves trade)
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:09 AM   #403
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
Yes it sucks but well run teams like the Hurricanes draft well and don't trade their draft picks are always going to be more susceptible much like the Ducks last expansion draft. I assume they feel they are better off just keeping their 1st round pick than trading it for Bean. As for the Flames if Valimaki wasn't injured I assume both Tanev and Gio would be available so really not much changes for the Flames except they probably lose the better defenseman in Tanev.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:10 AM   #404
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Friedman on 960 saying speculation is that Seattle is asking for a 1st and a 3rd to not pick a player. Even if it's just a 1st I can't see how the Flames could even consider that. Also says if the Kraken pick Gio that other teams will be inquiring about what it would take to acquire him. Sounds like the positives of taking Gio are so high that it's hard to imagine the Kraken backing down from their demands.
Trading Gio today is very hard due to the acquiring team needing to protect him.

Trading Gio after the expansion draft is a much easier, so I think what you've posted makes a ton of sense.

It's not really a question of Seattle bluffing or being greedy, it's likely based on Gio's value post expansion draft.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:10 AM   #405
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Friedman on 960 saying speculation is that Seattle is asking for a 1st and a 3rd to not pick a player. Even if it's just a 1st I can't see how the Flames could even consider that. Also says if the Kraken pick Gio that other teams will be inquiring about what it would take to acquire him. Sounds like the positives of taking Gio are so high that it's hard to imagine the Kraken backing down from their demands.
That’s an easy no. You can’t trade that much.

If the Flames feel they absolutely must keep Gio (I don’t agree), I think they should trade Hanifin or Tanev because Hanifin and Tanev should have high value after last season.

Last edited by Nelson; 07-16-2021 at 09:13 AM.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:16 AM   #406
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Trading Gio today is very hard due to the acquiring team needing to protect him.

Trading Gio after the expansion draft is a much easier, so I think what you've posted makes a ton of sense.

It's not really a question of Seattle bluffing or being greedy, it's likely based on Gio's value post expansion draft.
For sure, Ron Francis would not be doing his job correctly if he does not place pressure on each team within the league, he has to get maximum value.

If it was my call, I would definitely select Gio then move him at the deadline.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:24 AM   #407
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
Waddell should be fired immediately.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:03 AM   #408
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
If Bean were available for cheap, I would be fine with exposing both Tanev and Gio.
Tanev would go down as a 1 year UFA signing win. Tough to see him leave, but having both Bean and Gio would be better, both short term and long term. Plus there would still be some cap savings.

Bean is basically another Valimaki. Same age, production, draft position. Valimaki is probably better defensively. But I think Bean has more offensive upside.
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4

Expose Backlund and Giordano.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:04 AM   #409
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4

Expose Backlund and Giordano.

That pairs nicely with ‘exploring every avenue to keep Giordano’, haha
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 10:06 AM   #410
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
That pairs nicely with ‘exploring every avenue to keep Giordano’, haha
Yeah, it's not the best idea. Friday lunch hours...
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:21 AM   #411
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4

Expose Backlund and Giordano.
Mangiapane would get taken.

Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:22 AM   #412
Yrebmi
First Line Centre
 
Yrebmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rocky Mt House
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
Just thinking about this. If you take into account that, for good or ill, the Flames are in "win now " mode with Sutter, and you look at performance and contracts... I am exposing Rasmus. I think, with his skills, speed and offense in particular, he is a #4, and I don't like that contract much for a #4 d-man. Leave him exposed - I think he is much easier to replace for that price than Giordano is for his price. I don't mind being free of that contract, given what I have seen in terms of production/performance. This is strictly from the perspective of short-term success. Otherwise, I just let Giordano go and not worry about it.
There is no way you expose Rasmus Andersson. He would be an easy trade for good returns before you would even consider it.
Yrebmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:22 AM   #413
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
All of the GMs are backed into a corner.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:24 AM   #414
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Mangiapane would get taken.

Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
I like Monahan a lot and defend him from what I think are some unfair criticisms or inaccurate descriptions of his play. That said, I don't expose Mangiapane over him, due to age, health and contract considerations, plus plain old stats.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:24 AM   #415
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Mangiapane would get taken.

Gaudreau
Monahan
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Yeah, not sure how I missed that. Oh well, my bad idea got worse!

Ok, so Bean isn't going to happen. Dreamkiller
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 10:45 AM   #416
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Build a trade around Dube for Bean, protect 4 - 4

Expose Backlund and Giordano.
Flames will go with the 7-3-1

Trades for another dman, won't happen until after the expansion draft if the Flames are trying to acquire.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:50 AM   #417
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yrebmi View Post
There is no way you expose Rasmus Andersson. He would be an easy trade for good returns before you would even consider it.
Much prefer losing him than Hanifin, that much is for sure.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 10:54 AM   #418
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
Well any team with more than 3 defenseman or 8 skaters that are somewhat good is backed into a corner.

That's what an expansion draft is.

Certainly not the time for the guys not backed into a corner to start bragging about how thin they are.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 10:58 AM   #419
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Honestly I wish they could find a way to keep Giordano.

I like the story.

And I like the chances of him going season to season into his 40s on one year deals and adding to the story.

But you can only pay so much for sentimentality.

And I'm honestly still curious how Tanev's contract plays out. I would surmise the vast majority of this site had him breaking into pieces after two years and having the Flames on the hook for his last two years as a face palm.

Does he play as well and stay as healthy in the next three?
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 11:00 AM   #420
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Well any team with more than 3 defenseman or 8 skaters that are somewhat good is backed into a corner.

That's what an expansion draft is.

Certainly not the time for the guys not backed into a corner to start bragging about how thin they are.
Which is why it boggles the mind a little that a non-contending, non-playoff team might be giving up such a high quality asset to expansion. Something wasn’t planned properly.

There are several teams better than the Flames who aren’t nearly as backed in to a corner.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy