Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2016, 09:54 PM   #401
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

don't worry NBA / NFL refs, last time I checked Wideman couldn't shoot hoops or throw a touchdown, so I think you guys are safe.

Phew. Close one.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 12:07 AM   #402
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

NFL refs get run over all the time
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 08:53 AM   #403
mrkajz44
First Line Centre
 
mrkajz44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

I don't understand the statements from the NBA and NFL refs. The ruling essentially said that Wideman was concussed and collided with the linesman without an intent to injure. To me this reads as Wideman accidentally ran into the linesman, and he got a 10 game suspension. Players have been accidentally running into officials for a long time with 0 suspensions, so a 10 game suspension is suddenly sending the wrong message to players?
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 09:45 AM   #404
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
I don't understand the statements from the NBA and NFL refs. The ruling essentially said that Wideman was concussed and collided with the linesman without an intent to injure. To me this reads as Wideman accidentally ran into the linesman, and he got a 10 game suspension. Players have been accidentally running into officials for a long time with 0 suspensions, so a 10 game suspension is suddenly sending the wrong message to players?
They obviously don't agree with the notion it was accidental or he was concussed.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 09:47 AM   #405
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Things that should surprise no one:

  1. The team supports their player during the process.
  2. The league defaults to the harsher punishment to appease the officials, but knowing the NHLPA will appeal.
  3. Bettman upholds the decision of his thrall.
  4. Officials like the harsher punishment while players hate it.
  5. Most Flames fans support the player.
  6. Most non-Flames fans like to see the Flames in a bad light and therefore support the league.
  7. The media exaggerates the whole thing.
  8. A neutral arbitrator saw through it all and cut the punishment right down the middle.
Usually is these situations, the right decision is either the one that make everyone happy or everyone upset. The former was obviously not possible.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2016, 11:23 AM   #406
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

I'll just add that I also go the impression from Oldham's decision that he would lean closer to 0 than 20. Arbitrators try to avoid taking an extreme position though, as it's bad for business (it's less likely that parties will agree to a 'wildcard' arbitrator).
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 01:01 PM   #407
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
I don't understand the statements from the NBA and NFL refs. The ruling essentially said that Wideman was concussed and collided with the linesman without an intent to injure. To me this reads as Wideman accidentally ran into the linesman, and he got a 10 game suspension. Players have been accidentally running into officials for a long time with 0 suspensions, so a 10 game suspension is suddenly sending the wrong message to players?
It's not even that, going from 20 to 10 means that they didn't think Wideman had an intent to injure the linesman, but that the contact was still intentional.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 01:25 PM   #408
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

The refs are whining about the wrong party.

They should be whining at the NHL instead of the neutral third party arbitrator. Both Campbell/Bettman and Oldham used the rule book as the basis of their determination with the league effectively stating that 40.2 should apply but the arbitrator instead deeming that the violation was more properly covered under 40.3. What they should be agitating against is Rule 40.3 not the arbitrators finding that it applied. The arbitrator doesn't make the rules he merely adjudicates disputes within them.

Don't like the rules refs? Go bitch at the people who make them.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 01:25 PM   #409
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

LOL, my Oiler fan friend who thinks Wideman is the devil after all this said that Wideman should have gotten MORE than 20 games (not sure how much more, but he said closer to 50). Wow.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 01:33 PM   #410
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
LOL, my Oiler fan friend who thinks Wideman is the devil after all this said that Wideman should have gotten MORE than 20 games (not sure how much more, but he said closer to 50). Wow.
Pretty common sentiment. People just watched the video and assumed intent
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2016, 01:34 PM   #411
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
Pretty common sentiment. People just watched the video and assumed intent
It's just the nuanced analysis that comes from an Oiler fan.

"He score goal. He good. No matter defense."

It's what I've come to expect from them.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 07:24 AM   #412
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
I don't understand the statements from the NBA and NFL refs. The ruling essentially said that Wideman was concussed and collided with the linesman without an intent to injure. To me this reads as Wideman accidentally ran into the linesman, and he got a 10 game suspension. Players have been accidentally running into officials for a long time with 0 suspensions, so a 10 game suspension is suddenly sending the wrong message to players?
It's just a solidarity move, really. The NHLOA doesn't believe it to be accidental, and neither do the other officials unions.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 09:09 AM   #413
Steve Bozek
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
It's just a solidarity move, really. The NHLOA doesn't believe it to be accidental, and neither do the other officials unions.
I think these groups are misunderstanding what "intent to injure" means in the context of the arbitration and disciplinary hearings. I think the arbitrator would view "intent to injure" as either a planned attack like the Bertuzzi-Moore incident, or an injury perpetrated by a repeat offender who has a history of apparent deliberate attempts to injure (e.g. slimeballs like Cooke or Torres).

Whether or not one believes Wideman was concussed and wasn't in full control of what he was doing, I don't think anyone would suggest that Wideman planned the attack, nor does he have any history of being a player who goes out of his way to hurt people.
Steve Bozek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 11:32 AM   #414
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

WOW Bettman pretty damn smug at the end of this clip

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/l...ion-concluded/
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 11:33 AM   #415
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
WOW Bettman pretty smug all the time
fyp
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 11:35 AM   #416
Lanny'sDaMan
Franchise Player
 
Lanny'sDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
WOW Bettman pretty damn smug at the end of this clip

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/l...ion-concluded/
I have never wanted to hit someone in the face so badly in my life. I mean with a lead filled baseball bat. What an arrogant C word. And it ain't coconut.
Lanny'sDaMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 11:59 AM   #417
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Such a swarmy little prick.
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:07 PM   #418
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
WOW Bettman pretty damn smug at the end of this clip

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/l...ion-concluded/
I feel that was telling as to the NHLs involvement in delaying the decision so Wideman would have to sit 20 regardless of the suspension being lifted or reduced. The NHL is run like a tee-ball team.
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:11 PM   #419
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Bozek View Post
I think these groups are misunderstanding what "intent to injure" means in the context of the arbitration and disciplinary hearings. I think the arbitrator would view "intent to injure" as either a planned attack like the Bertuzzi-Moore incident, or an injury perpetrated by a repeat offender who has a history of apparent deliberate attempts to injure (e.g. slimeballs like Cooke or Torres).

Whether or not one believes Wideman was concussed and wasn't in full control of what he was doing, I don't think anyone would suggest that Wideman planned the attack, nor does he have any history of being a player who goes out of his way to hurt people.
Yeah, intent was never proven in this case. Bettman tried to make it sound like there was intent by releasing that text message, but fortunately, the arbitrator isn't stupid and didn't buy it.

I think there is at the very least, reasonable doubt that it was intentional. While the NHL isn't a court of law, it's still a logical principle to use when handing out a punishment.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 12:16 PM   #420
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
WOW Bettman pretty damn smug at the end of this clip

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/l...ion-concluded/
If the Flames didn't have a bone to pick with the league with how the whole situation was handled before, now they have proof.

The commissioner of a league like the NHL should be acting like that. Bush league stuff.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy