[GT] Scary Bad Flames @ Ugly Disgusting Oilers

[ComixZone]

Originally Posted by Blaster86

That was a yucky call. That should count.

They set the precedent with that Leafs goal on what is goaltender interference. The hand on the face makes, and initial contact makes it a no goal.

Do I agree with it? No, not really. But the law is the law.

[KootenayFlamesFan]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

That would be impeding then. I honestly think this is a precedent setting call

Not really, they've disallowed goals for years with no penalty for incidental contact with the goalie. This was the same thing.

[Volatile]

Bollig needs to start fighting some Oilers. Is Ferland playing? Oilers are taking way too many cheapshots on Johnny and no one is doing anything about it.

[codynw]

Someone needs to start standing up for Gaudreau. He seems to get slashed on the hands a lot.

[direwolf]

So are the Flames gonna get a PP anytime soon? Or do the Coilers just play infraction free hockey?

[indes]

Originally Posted by Blaster86

That was a yucky call. That should count.

IMO after he leans into ramo there was no way he could regain his balance to get to the other post. Seems like impedance to me.

[TBone290]

That Honda commercial with the dad playing catch with his son. He really needs to learn how to catch.

[burnitdown]

Gawd...nasty injury for Hendricks. Sick.

[Volatile]

Jesus, CBC, can we get a NSFL tag or something? My god.

[dammage79]

Originally Posted by burnitdown

Why was that a gamble? Is there any negative outcome if the goal wasn't overturned? Do we just lose the chance to review a play later in the game (which would be unlikely)? Seems almost no-risk to try. And I'm not asking to be a smart ass...I'm actually wondering.

They lose their time out for the game if the call stands. Which would be key if they\re playing from behind late in the third.

[Enoch Root]

clearly the ref watched a replay of the penalty call while he was in the box and figured he needed to right things

[Yamer]

Originally Posted by burnitdown

Why was that a gamble? Is there any negative outcome if the goal wasn't overturned? Do we just lose the chance to review a play later in the game (which would be unlikely)? Seems almost no-risk to try. And I'm not asking to be a smart ass...I'm actually wondering.

Flames lose their time-out.

[jemjey]

Wow i did not think that challenge was gonna go our way. Give bob another jack adams

[Armchair Quarterback]

Not sure why CBC has to give us the close up image of that injury

[-TC-]

That was a juicy one

[Yamer]

Are you kidding me?

[JurassicTunga12]

what is with the Flames being so undisciplined.

[Skaloper]

Wow another weak penalty

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

[GranteedEV]

Oh.
My.
God.
**** these refs.

[burnitdown]

Big hit on Gaudreau. Big rebound by Ramo. Big mistake calling a penalty by the refs on that weak take-down.