Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2014, 01:43 PM   #401
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

To me trading up doesn't make sense. Acquiring another top 10 pick, on the other hand, makes perfect sense. I would love to grab Reinhart, but not even the experts see a huge difference between Bennett/Draisaitl/Reinhart.

Coming away with one of Bennett/Reinhart and potentially another top 10 pick Virtanen/Ritchie would be a great day.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2014, 01:50 PM   #402
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

How exactly do the Flames grab that extra pick in the top 10? What do they have to give that would make sense?
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 01:54 PM   #403
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
How exactly do the Flames grab that extra pick in the top 10? What do they have to give that would make sense?
They have 2 seconds, Hudler, Wideman (with salary retention), Glencross (if they convinced him to waive).

Not saying it's going to happen, but I'm sure they are kicking tires. Like most people think, I think Burke is high on Ritchie and has good reason to be IMO (just not at #4).
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 01:55 PM   #404
Stanathan
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Stanathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyZ View Post
Considering you think Ritchie is fat, you might wan git them thur eyes checked up good too!
Considering you thought I was serious, I'm certain I'm not the one who needs to get things checked.
Stanathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 01:56 PM   #405
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
How exactly do the Flames grab that extra pick in the top 10? What do they have to give that would make sense?
Assuming we draft one of Reinhart or Bennett...

Backlund + 34th OA
The Fonz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 02:10 PM   #406
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Trading up from 4th only makes sense if it is for the 1st overall and taking Ekblad.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2014, 02:37 PM   #407
Azhouse
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Azhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Backlund + 34th OA
Only in a fictional place called Flameland would this get it done
Azhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 03:15 PM   #408
squiggs96
Franchise Player
 
squiggs96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanathan View Post
Thanks u four bringing my attention too teh terribad errur in grammer. I hope u done get to mad over their and have an anurism from reading my typing but would it be teh worse thing in teh world if all teh grammer nazis did?
You should always blame others for your own mistakes. That way you'll never do anything wrong. When communicating with words, using the proper words is highly overrated.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Jesus this site these days
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame View Post
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I should probably stop posting at this point
squiggs96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 09:01 PM   #409
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Day Tripper View Post
I actually had a dream once that the Flames moved up to #1 and took Draisaitl.

Anyway, while I'd prefer either Sam, the idea of having two big skilled centers in the Pacific Division is nice...
That dream moved one year later would be McDavid!
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 09:20 PM   #410
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Sabres GM Tim Murray in post 1st round interviews admitted he had contacted the Flames and Oilers about trading down, but that was only to be completed if Reinhart was drafted 1st OA by another team.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2014, 10:04 PM   #411
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Sabres GM Tim Murray in post 1st round interviews admitted he had contacted the Flames and Oilers about trading down, but that was only to be completed if Reinhart was drafted 1st OA by another team.
Wow. I'm super happy with Bennett but Ekblad would've been something else.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 11:13 PM   #412
Falclore
Farm Team Player
 
Falclore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Boomer trying to stir up ratings / viewers with crazy predictions. Sounds alot like we must pick Hunter from last year. Now Van wants to trade him as part of most trade scenarios. Good thing Boomer isn't the GM.
Falclore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 11:18 PM   #413
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Wow. I'm super happy with Bennett but Ekblad would've been something else.
I prefer Bennett.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2014, 11:19 PM   #414
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I had it between Reinhart and Bennett for who I would've picked #1.

I have a personal bias towards Reinhart but honestly preferred Bennett's game more.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 11:21 PM   #415
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

We didn't have to give up anything else to get Bennett.

Considering the rumoured offers to move up, we made the right move staying put.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 11:23 PM   #416
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Honestly tried to go back and find the post's where I jumped on the Bennett train during the season. All I know is, this kid and this team were made for each other. The way Hartley wants the team to play the game and the way Bennett plays the game is a great marriage.

So glad they got the guy that plays the no nonsense "don't eff with us" ind of game that we watched last season. Still euphoric over this pick.



Nailed it!
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 04:05 AM   #417
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Standing back and looking at the big picture from the combine until the draft, we see a series of events unfold:

-Burke's comments on lying before the draft, and doing so as much as you can to tip the scales in your favor.
-Bennett somehow 'inadvertently' unable to do a pull up at the combine
-Boomer putting it out there over the radio waves that, from his 'very good source' the Flames may be looking to move up to #2 (truth) and might be looking at Draisaitl as 'their guy'(underhanded devilish speculation to get the Oilers to panic?)

one has to wonder that this whole charade was straight from the mind of Burke, with his absolute uncanny ability to somehow keep the prospect he wanted away from the oily fingers up north and into the Flames' laps. Especially with knowing that Reinhart was a hot commodity in Buffalo, and that Ekblad was the favorite to go #1 by most scouts.

This script would certainly make for a great espionage thriller. Comes with free popcorn and a tinfoil hat.
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2014, 04:24 AM   #418
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
This script would certainly make for a great espionage thriller. Comes with free popcorn and a tinfoil hat.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 05:34 AM   #419
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

The Flames put this out there so Edmonton would take Draisatl and they could get Bennet.
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 06:01 AM   #420
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkey View Post
The Flames put this out there so Edmonton would take Draisatl and they could get Bennet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
Standing back and looking at the big picture from the combine until the draft, we see a series of events unfold:

-Burke's comments on lying before the draft, and doing so as much as you can to tip the scales in your favor.
-Bennett somehow 'inadvertently' unable to do a pull up at the combine
-Boomer putting it out there over the radio waves that, from his 'very good source' the Flames may be looking to move up to #2 (truth) and might be looking at Draisaitl as 'their guy'(underhanded devilish speculation to get the Oilers to panic?)

one has to wonder that this whole charade was straight from the mind of Burke, with his absolute uncanny ability to somehow keep the prospect he wanted away from the oily fingers up north and into the Flames' laps. Especially with knowing that Reinhart was a hot commodity in Buffalo, and that Ekblad was the favorite to go #1 by most scouts.
I was totally thinking the same thing! The fan960 guys have seemed to be used to groom the mood and language of fans more than ever this past season. There's a difference between being homers (which guys like Kerr especially are not), and constantly pounding the drum of "exciting hockey is more important than winning hockey, and by gosh aren't the flames an exciting group?". There seemed to be a gear shift in how the radio personalities were speaking, one from cheerleader to mouthpiece. Subtle, but different.

Yet, how can a media group owned by the Toronto maple leafs be privy to the plans of the flames entertainment group? Maybe the flames are simply becoming more skilled and sophisticated at controlling the information which goes to the media. Seemed to happen after Burke appeared.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy