12-16-2024, 12:23 PM
|
#4141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I think the city should be pushing the province to for cost certainty because this is their estimate now
|
There's a part of me that honestly wouldn't hate for the city to now wait this project out and see what happens with the provincial election in 2027.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2024, 12:26 PM
|
#4142
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Except that because the UCP gave the go ahead, we've already committed hundreds of millions of dollars.
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 12:36 PM
|
#4143
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Sorry, I don't personally have access to them. That info nugget comes from the design and construction team members who are (were?) on the project, some of whom I work with regularly though.
|
Well they've been banging their heads against the wall for nearly a decade now trying to make a tunnel work...that might be what they mean with "studied to death"
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
We'd be further ahead if the UCP had paid you the $2.5M instead of AECOM.
|
I'd have done it for $1.8M and given the other $700k necessary to save the project according to one councillor
We'd also be further ahead if the City just gave the province all of their studies that show why elevated can't work. But then the province might reasonably ask if noise, vibrations, aesthetics, and a theoretical $100-160M drop in property values really justify an extra ~Billion...
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 12:38 PM
|
#4144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Well they've been banging their heads against the wall for nearly a decade now trying to make a tunnel work...that might be what they mean with "studied to death"
I'd have done it for $1.8M and given the other $700k necessary to save the project according to one councillor
We'd also be further ahead if the City just gave the province all of their studies that show why elevated can't work. But then the province might reasonably ask if noise, vibrations, aesthetics, and a theoretical $100-160M drop in property values really justify an extra ~Billion...
|
Problem. Solved.
Get on it City Council.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2024, 12:40 PM
|
#4145
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
There's a part of me that honestly wouldn't hate for the city to now wait this project out and see what happens with the provincial election in 2027.
|
$1.53B from the feds will evaporate at the end of March. But we've essentially wasted an entire funding cycle either way, so it wouldn't be a huge difference in the long run (ie. the city probably doesn't have capacity to take advantage if the upcoming funding cycle)
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 04:01 PM
|
#4146
|
Franchise Player
|
Somebody on Bluesky proposed (half-seriously, I think) that the line end on 10th Ave and then continue as an elevated walkway along with moving walkways down 2nd St. Could connect to the +15/+30s.
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 05:29 PM
|
#4147
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
Somebody on Bluesky proposed (half-seriously, I think) that the line end on 10th Ave and then continue as an elevated walkway along with moving walkways down 2nd St. Could connect to the +15/+30s.
|
Just shutdown First Street from 10th Ave and replace it with a street car. Build a bridge to link up with Center Street and run the street car up to 16th or wherever where they can create a terminus for the north line.
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 09:55 PM
|
#4148
|
First Line Centre
|
You know what's a terrible idea? Having a brand new train line and having it not connect to the current ones by a couple blocks.
__________________
MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
|
|
|
12-16-2024, 09:59 PM
|
#4149
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigThief
You know what's a terrible idea? Having a brand new train line and having it not connect to the current ones by a couple blocks.
|
Its a public health initiative. A little walk never hurt anyone.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2024, 10:08 PM
|
#4150
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Its a public health initiative. A little walk never hurt anyone.
|
I can't wait for the Wall-e hover chairs
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 10:23 AM
|
#4151
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
The city put a 'Making Way for the Green Line' sign on the closed Centre/28th Ave NW 711 sometime in the past week lol...
Maybe we'll see it in the north in my lifetime but I'm certainly not optimistic anymore.
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 11:11 AM
|
#4152
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture
The city put a 'Making Way for the Green Line' sign on the closed Centre/28th Ave NW 711 sometime in the past week lol...
Maybe we'll see it in the north in my lifetime but I'm certainly not optimistic anymore.
|
The BRT improvements being done on centre street are part of the green line project.
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 07:19 PM
|
#4153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-17-2024, 07:58 PM
|
#4154
|
First Line Centre
|
So no tunnels and it costs more? Brilliant. Danielle & Devin Financial Group bang out another winner
__________________
MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 08:01 PM
|
#4155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigThief
So no tunnels and it costs more? Brilliant. Danielle & Devin Financial Group bang out another winner
|
I would bet they didn’t include sunk costs into the previous alignment.
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 09:20 PM
|
#4156
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I would bet they didn’t include sunk costs into the previous alignment.
|
It is concerning that there is this much sunk cost apparently only relevant to the tunnel with no real progress. Have we already bought a TBM?
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to powderjunkie For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-17-2024, 09:43 PM
|
#4157
|
Franchise Player
|
At this point I think you have to consider the provincial funding dead and do what you can to secure as much of the federal funding as you can and build anything productive.
Which means BRT, because it would be incredibly foolish to build an LRT entirely predicated on future extensions in this environment where you cannot trust your funding partner(s) - federal funding as probably about to become similarly precarious.
Give the Province conditions and a deadline for their funding. When they fail to do so, draw big black X over their logo on all of the GL signs in the city. At least they'll have a scapegoat for going back to busses (though I honestly believe it would offer better service than these stub line plans before even considering the lower cost).
NDP platform needs to offer a permanent fix for transit capital projects. This ad hoc approach is garbage.
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
|
|
|
12-17-2024, 09:45 PM
|
#4158
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
It is concerning that there is this much sunk cost apparently only relevant to the tunnel with no real progress. Have we already bought a TBM?
|
How much of those sunk costs were incurred while the province was fully onboard with tunnelling?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-17-2024, 11:49 PM
|
#4159
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I would bet they didn’t include sunk costs into the previous alignment.
|
Which they shouldn't. You should always compare go-forward costs between two options.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-18-2024, 09:51 AM
|
#4160
|
Scoring Winger
|
Honestly, the best thing for The City to do right now may be to just walk away from the project entirely and wait for a new government. This is ridiculous.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to The Fisher Account For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 PM.
|
|