Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-30-2022, 09:25 AM   #4041
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Getting Huberdeau was obviously very key for the Flames losing both Johnny and Tkachuk. For me, the top line of Huberdeau-Lindholm-??? will be consistently dangerous and that's what they need to be a top team. The rest of the line up is much the same as last year and you hope that Mangiapane can be more consistent through the year and Coleman can find his scoring touch more often to give the team a bit of a bump to make up for the slight drop in production from the top line compared to last year.

If nothing else of significance is added in the top 6, a Sutter system should see the Flames in a playoff spot and I'd expect a bit of a drop offensively. Other guys could see an uptick in their offensive production in a way that allows the Flames to be an offensive force like last season, but betting on steep improvements from the players on the roster now is a bad bet. Adding a guy you can count on to put points up in the top 6 would really improve the outlook.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:26 AM   #4042
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Yes but that’s not enough
How do we know what will be enough scoring or who will score what sitting here at the end of July?
rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:27 AM   #4043
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz View Post
he replaces Gaudreau, but who replaces 100+ points that Tkachuk brought?
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:35 AM   #4044
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino View Post
How do we know what will be enough scoring or who will score what sitting here at the end of July?
Did someone forgot to tell you this is an opinion board?

The team lost 2 top players including its primary offense generator for the last 5 yrs. Even if Huberdeau has a career year, it would be hard to replace 2 guys.

There is nobody in the system that screams ready for top duty. Mangi is the other guy but don’t forget he had a hot start.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:37 AM   #4045
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

When Sutters cup winning teams won it all they were bottom 5 in league scoring in the regular season. Some of ya'll are making it seem like losing Tkachuks points is going to be a huge deal. I think Sutter will have this team focusing even more on checking and being stingy on D, which honestly is probably for the best after they tried river hockey against the Oilers last playoffs.

Last edited by Burning Beard; 07-30-2022 at 09:39 AM.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Burning Beard For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 09:44 AM   #4046
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Well, neither Huberdeau nor Weegar are Sutter hard checking stingy type.

Hopefully Sutter somehow manages to squeeze that out of basically the same group
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:46 AM   #4047
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

From Steinberg this morning: https://flamesnation.ca/2022/07/30/w...of-the-season/

Quote:
There’s been buzz surrounding interest in Lucic at different times this summer, and I don’t believe Calgary would have to “sweeten” a move involving him. Monahan, on the other hand, is a tougher contract to move and the Flames would almost certainly have to include an asset to facilitate a trade.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 09:47 AM   #4048
Burning Beard
#1 Goaltender
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Well, neither Huberdeau nor Weegar are Sutter hard checking stingy type.

Hopefully Sutter somehow manages to squeeze that out of basically the same group
I saw a chart that showed Weegar was one of the top Dmen at denying zone entries in the playoffs last year. Seems like an important part of checking. Where are you getting that he isnt a good checker?
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:50 AM   #4049
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Beard View Post
I saw a chart that showed Weegar was one of the top Dmen at denying zone entries in the playoffs last year. Seems like an important part of checking. Where are you getting that he isnt a good checker?
He is a great dman that generates both offense and defense. He also makes lots of mistakes. I don’t have problem with him. I just don’t know if he is enough to change the defense with guys like Andersson, Hanifin and Kylington into hard and stingy
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:55 AM   #4050
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
He is a great dman that generates both offense and defense. He also makes lots of mistakes. I don’t have problem with him. I just don’t know if he is enough to change the defense with guys like Andersson, Hanifin and Kylington into hard and stingy
What about Tanev?
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:57 AM   #4051
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
What about Tanev?
What about him? He has always been there

The defense will be better with Weegar. The question if it is enough to change the team into a hard stringy to compensate for the likely lower scoring if we can’t find more offense
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:17 AM   #4052
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:20 AM   #4053
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
Yeah but 2 favorable factors

- low base salary remained,1M?

- Looch is an awesome dude
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:21 AM   #4054
iggyloob12
Scoring Winger
 
iggyloob12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Albert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
The difference is Lucic's salary is only $1M, which is appealing for teams that have cap space but need to reach the cap floor. They're buying the cap more than anything, and a player that can hit … when he can catch up to the play.
iggyloob12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to iggyloob12 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 10:32 AM   #4055
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Lucic is also still elite at one facet of the game that some teams value. A lot of things would need to line up considering his NTC, but it's not inconceivable that there's a young team out there that wants some Looch. Cap aside, I know I would.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:39 AM   #4056
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
Looch is a tough situation for me. He eats up a lot of cap space - agreed. Flames could replace that with someone that contributes much more offensively than Looch does. But Looch is a loved teammate and clear leader in the room - this is fact based on comments from his teammates. You also likely don't get the same from the player you replace him with in these areas, not to mention the intimidation factor and ability to amp the team up with a fight. If they can get a guy like Kadri but it means you have to move a Looch, then fine. It's a huge swing in production and Kadri comes with that grit you lose in moving Looch. Otherwise I'd prefer we keep him.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 10:43 AM   #4057
Flames_F.T.W
Scoring Winger
 
Flames_F.T.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Guys play bigger when Looch is in the lineup for sure. He's a valuable player and by all counts a huge part of that dressing room. However that cap hit is rough.
Flames_F.T.W is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames_F.T.W For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 10:43 AM   #4058
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
One thing I won't miss is Tcachuk's no look passes to NO ONE.
Totally this.

Love those no look hard rims back to the point on the PP. Those and the lovely waist high cross ice passes to Johnny off the cycle.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
Old 07-30-2022, 10:44 AM   #4059
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
Sure, but it still 40 goals that another player needs to score to keep pace.
mdubz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:47 AM   #4060
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
Exactly, the last time the Flames won the division they had zero hundred point scorers...people are acting like having two is the only way to be successful now.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy