07-30-2022, 09:25 AM
|
#4041
|
Franchise Player
|
Getting Huberdeau was obviously very key for the Flames losing both Johnny and Tkachuk. For me, the top line of Huberdeau-Lindholm-??? will be consistently dangerous and that's what they need to be a top team. The rest of the line up is much the same as last year and you hope that Mangiapane can be more consistent through the year and Coleman can find his scoring touch more often to give the team a bit of a bump to make up for the slight drop in production from the top line compared to last year.
If nothing else of significance is added in the top 6, a Sutter system should see the Flames in a playoff spot and I'd expect a bit of a drop offensively. Other guys could see an uptick in their offensive production in a way that allows the Flames to be an offensive force like last season, but betting on steep improvements from the players on the roster now is a bad bet. Adding a guy you can count on to put points up in the top 6 would really improve the outlook.
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:26 AM
|
#4042
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
Yes but that’s not enough
|
How do we know what will be enough scoring or who will score what sitting here at the end of July?
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:27 AM
|
#4043
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz
he replaces Gaudreau, but who replaces 100+ points that Tkachuk brought?
|
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:35 AM
|
#4044
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino
How do we know what will be enough scoring or who will score what sitting here at the end of July?
|
Did someone forgot to tell you this is an opinion board?
The team lost 2 top players including its primary offense generator for the last 5 yrs. Even if Huberdeau has a career year, it would be hard to replace 2 guys.
There is nobody in the system that screams ready for top duty. Mangi is the other guy but don’t forget he had a hot start.
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:37 AM
|
#4045
|
#1 Goaltender
|
When Sutters cup winning teams won it all they were bottom 5 in league scoring in the regular season. Some of ya'll are making it seem like losing Tkachuks points is going to be a huge deal. I think Sutter will have this team focusing even more on checking and being stingy on D, which honestly is probably for the best after they tried river hockey against the Oilers last playoffs.
Last edited by Burning Beard; 07-30-2022 at 09:39 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Burning Beard For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:44 AM
|
#4046
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Well, neither Huberdeau nor Weegar are Sutter hard checking stingy type.
Hopefully Sutter somehow manages to squeeze that out of basically the same group
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:46 AM
|
#4047
|
Franchise Player
|
From Steinberg this morning: https://flamesnation.ca/2022/07/30/w...of-the-season/
Quote:
There’s been buzz surrounding interest in Lucic at different times this summer, and I don’t believe Calgary would have to “sweeten” a move involving him. Monahan, on the other hand, is a tougher contract to move and the Flames would almost certainly have to include an asset to facilitate a trade.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:47 AM
|
#4048
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
Well, neither Huberdeau nor Weegar are Sutter hard checking stingy type.
Hopefully Sutter somehow manages to squeeze that out of basically the same group
|
I saw a chart that showed Weegar was one of the top Dmen at denying zone entries in the playoffs last year. Seems like an important part of checking. Where are you getting that he isnt a good checker?
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:50 AM
|
#4049
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Beard
I saw a chart that showed Weegar was one of the top Dmen at denying zone entries in the playoffs last year. Seems like an important part of checking. Where are you getting that he isnt a good checker?
|
He is a great dman that generates both offense and defense. He also makes lots of mistakes. I don’t have problem with him. I just don’t know if he is enough to change the defense with guys like Andersson, Hanifin and Kylington into hard and stingy
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:55 AM
|
#4050
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
He is a great dman that generates both offense and defense. He also makes lots of mistakes. I don’t have problem with him. I just don’t know if he is enough to change the defense with guys like Andersson, Hanifin and Kylington into hard and stingy
|
What about Tanev?
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 09:57 AM
|
#4051
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
What about Tanev?
|
What about him? He has always been there
The defense will be better with Weegar. The question if it is enough to change the team into a hard stringy to compensate for the likely lower scoring if we can’t find more offense
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:17 AM
|
#4052
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mile
|
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:20 AM
|
#4053
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
|
Yeah but 2 favorable factors
- low base salary remained,1M?
- Looch is an awesome dude
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:21 AM
|
#4054
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Albert
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
I don’t buy that flames wouldn’t have to add a sweetener for lucic . Every report is some teams would take cap space but it will cost. Yet for somehow the flames would be an exception? There are other routes that teams could take to reach cap floor. Flames don’t have any other route when it comes to lucic. Also if they could have traded lucic without a sweetener the flames probably would have already done it. I love lucic but $5 million for a 4th liner is on no teams desires even with intangibles .
|
The difference is Lucic's salary is only $1M, which is appealing for teams that have cap space but need to reach the cap floor. They're buying the cap more than anything, and a player that can hit … when he can catch up to the play.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to iggyloob12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:32 AM
|
#4055
|
First Line Centre
|
Lucic is also still elite at one facet of the game that some teams value. A lot of things would need to line up considering his NTC, but it's not inconceivable that there's a young team out there that wants some Looch. Cap aside, I know I would.
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:39 AM
|
#4056
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mile
|
Looch is a tough situation for me. He eats up a lot of cap space - agreed. Flames could replace that with someone that contributes much more offensively than Looch does. But Looch is a loved teammate and clear leader in the room - this is fact based on comments from his teammates. You also likely don't get the same from the player you replace him with in these areas, not to mention the intimidation factor and ability to amp the team up with a fight. If they can get a guy like Kadri but it means you have to move a Looch, then fine. It's a huge swing in production and Kadri comes with that grit you lose in moving Looch. Otherwise I'd prefer we keep him.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:43 AM
|
#4057
|
Scoring Winger
|
Guys play bigger when Looch is in the lineup for sure. He's a valuable player and by all counts a huge part of that dressing room. However that cap hit is rough.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames_F.T.W For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:43 AM
|
#4058
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning
One thing I won't miss is Tcachuk's no look passes to NO ONE.
|
Totally this.
Love those no look hard rims back to the point on the PP. Those and the lovely waist high cross ice passes to Johnny off the cycle.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:44 AM
|
#4059
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
|
Sure, but it still 40 goals that another player needs to score to keep pace.
|
|
|
07-30-2022, 10:47 AM
|
#4060
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Points don’t work that way with players on the same line.
|
Exactly, the last time the Flames won the division they had zero hundred point scorers...people are acting like having two is the only way to be successful now.
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.
|
|